Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-16-2024, 09:47 AM
sphynx88 sphynx88 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 182
Default Have the XE262 cam, what cam for 72 CC Edelbrock RPM Heads?

'78 Pontiac Firebird with a stock 400. 6x-8 heads. 2.56 posi gears.

Thinking of opting for the Edelbrock 72CC RPM heads as (as opposed to the 87CC which I hear is better suited for 455's but someone please tell me otherwise).

Currently I have a stock stall converter and the Comp XE262H cam. Would this cam be okay with the higher compression heads or would I be better suited with something else. No problem to swap out of for a higher stall if I need to.

I'm also looking at the Edelbrock Total Power Package which includes heads, a cam and an intake, however I'll need to also acquire a drop base for my shaker which just adds to the overall cost.

Just based on this thread, it seems like with my gears, I may benefit from my smaller cam than the power package one, but just looking for validation:
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...d.php?t=423212

Lastly, is there much else I'll need for this project aside from checking/ordering pushrods and potentially a higher stall converter? Seems like I can use stock rockers, but maybe a good time to also jump onto some roller rockers.

Thanks!

__________________
1978 Pontiac Trans Am 400 WS6

Comp XE262
Functional Shaker Hood
Tribal Tubes Tri-Y Headers
Pypes Crossflow exhaust

Last edited by sphynx88; 05-16-2024 at 10:05 AM.
  #2  
Old 05-16-2024, 10:28 AM
78w72 78w72 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: iowa
Posts: 4,771
Default

Will let others suggest a cam, but if you use the 72cc heads it will raise the compression a lot vs the 6x-8 heads that have ~103cc. Use a calculator to confirm the compression with the E-heads.

With higher compression you can use & definitely would want a bigger cam to work with that higher comp... & that will require a higher stall converter, they should be matched to each other for best performance, the 2.56 gears will limit how big the cam & how high the stall can be. Hopefully some of the cam experts here can suggest the best combo for that.

A factory intake ported or unported wold be the best intake with any street type cam you pic, dont need the RPM intake to create problems with the shaker or hood clearance. Even a holley street dominator or torker2 if you use a holley type carb wouldwork better than the RPM intake... & there are much better cams than the edelbrock options. Definitely need to check pushrod length when changing the cam/heads.


Last edited by 78w72; 05-16-2024 at 10:49 AM.
  #3  
Old 05-16-2024, 10:35 AM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,449
Default

https://butlerperformance.com/n-1287...alculator.html



.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE
  #4  
Old 05-16-2024, 10:53 AM
JB Eng Wis JB Eng Wis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 39
Default

Just my thought..... Save all that money , from not buying the power package...
#1 change your rear gearing... see how you like it.... then #2 look for a Torque Conv...

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JB Eng Wis For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 05-16-2024, 11:09 AM
scott06 scott06 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JB Eng Wis View Post
Just my thought..... Save all that money , from not buying the power package...
#1 change your rear gearing... see how you like it.... then #2 look for a Torque Conv...
probably the cheapest way to wake it up vs 2.56's can run a sedate 3.08 or 3.36 ish and still have low highway rpm

  #6  
Old 05-16-2024, 11:31 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,846
Default

A agree with post four 100%!

With your 2.56 gears Bolting on the RPM heads with there greater port area even with a gain in compression and without a swap to a tad bigger Cam will sacrifice around town drivability.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #7  
Old 05-16-2024, 11:56 AM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 1,751
Default

If it has the stock 78 pistons in it yet with the big bevel on the piston top the compression with the 72cc heads would only be in the low 9s. That would work fine with that small XE.

  #8  
Old 05-16-2024, 01:58 PM
Tim Corcoran's Avatar
Tim Corcoran Tim Corcoran is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Willow Spring, North Carolina
Posts: 4,746
Default

With 2.56 gears you don't really want to put in a high stall torque converter. Those gears are great for MPG and highway driving not so much for drag racing. If you want to keep those gears put in a small cam that makes big torque and keep the stock converter. And if you put eheads on, it will have tons of power and easily go 150+ MPH. Use the factory iron intake and a well tunes Q-Jet nothing will work better. Make sure you port match and blend in the intake to the new eheads.

This cam would work well with your gears and a stock converter

https://butlerperformance.com/i-3164...tegory:1234796

__________________
Tim Corcoran

Last edited by Tim Corcoran; 05-16-2024 at 02:10 PM.
  #9  
Old 05-16-2024, 03:16 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,633
Default

Waste of head flow with that small cam if you do that! Heads and cam change as well as an intake change the 78 intake unless massaged will kill flow to E heads.I ran a 72 HO intake on some for awhile .
Having swapped out my 2.56 I agree a gear change will make the most change. Too much convertor and a 2.56 it will never lock up and create too much heat for your trans.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #10  
Old 05-16-2024, 04:55 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,633
Default

But with 2.56 gears you can run 130 mph just turning 4000!

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #11  
Old 05-16-2024, 06:51 PM
Tim Corcoran's Avatar
Tim Corcoran Tim Corcoran is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Willow Spring, North Carolina
Posts: 4,746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip Fix View Post
Waste of head flow with that small cam if you do that! Heads and cam change as well as an intake change the 78 intake unless massaged will kill flow to E heads.I ran a 72 HO intake on some for awhile .
Having swapped out my 2.56 I agree a gear change will make the most change. Too much convertor and a 2.56 it will never lock up and create too much heat for your trans.
If you put a large duration cam in a car with 2.56 gears it will be a dog. My recommendation for a cam is what a car with those gears would need for best performance. It doesn't matter if its taking full advantage of the airflow or not.

__________________
Tim Corcoran
  #12  
Old 05-16-2024, 07:46 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,832
Default

Run what you have and just put like a 3.30ish rear gear in it.After that then decide if its enough for you.JMHO,Tom

  #13  
Old 05-16-2024, 09:18 PM
carcrazy carcrazy is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 1,992
Default

Change those gears!!! (first)

__________________
My money talks to me-it usually says goodbye!
  #14  
Old 05-17-2024, 12:16 AM
phil400's Avatar
phil400 phil400 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 321
Default

Please before you do anything else or spend anymore money Find a copy of Jim Hands how to build a high performance Pontiac for stock stuff or Rocky Rotella newer version for big $$ stuff.

__________________
78 T/A 4SPEED, Original paint, match #’s, mine since ‘99.
77 t/a sold
85 Monte Carlo SS sold
83 Mustang GT sold
The Following User Says Thank You to phil400 For This Useful Post:
  #15  
Old 05-17-2024, 07:23 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,027
Default

If you install 72cc heads the compression ratio goes from about 7.5/7.7 to 1 up to at least 10 to 1. That is a HUGE increase in static compression and with that tiny little XE262 cam dynamic compression will be high, maybe even past the threshold for pump gas even with aluminum heads and "modern" combustion chambers.

The increase in compression is opening the door for more camshaft. At a minimum I'd move up to something around 222-224 @ .050" and wider LSA. At least you'll start to take advantage of the improved head flow as Skip mentioned and make more power at every RPM.......

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #16  
Old 05-17-2024, 09:18 AM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Corcoran View Post
If you put a large duration cam in a car with 2.56 gears it will be a dog. My recommendation for a cam is what a car with those gears would need for best performance. It doesn't matter if its taking full advantage of the airflow or not.
All depends how big you go. Even in a low compression 400 6X head mine was fine with a 228/228 @ 0.050 once I got a carb with a better idle circuit

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #17  
Old 05-17-2024, 09:56 AM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 1,751
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff R View Post
If you install 72cc heads the compression ratio goes from about 7.5/7.7 to 1 up to at least 10 to 1. That is a HUGE increase in static compression and with that tiny little XE262 cam dynamic compression will be high, maybe even past the threshold for pump gas even with aluminum heads and "modern" combustion chambers.

The increase in compression is opening the door for more camshaft. At a minimum I'd move up to something around 222-224 @ .050" and wider LSA. At least you'll start to take advantage of the improved head flow as Skip mentioned and make more power at every RPM.......
I come up with 9.57 SCR if it has the stock pistons.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	3D9FEB8A-0078-4DD3-B105-61A5351F1DDE.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	45.4 KB
ID:	633820   Click image for larger version

Name:	D51E371B-F537-4147-9F50-521F26FF3C0E.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	35.7 KB
ID:	633821  

  #18  
Old 05-17-2024, 11:20 AM
sphynx88 sphynx88 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 182
Default

Thanks for all the replies everyone! Looks like I'm going to be looking into regearing in the near future. I don't drive the car long enough distances to warrant these gears! I'd prefer to keep my current carrier and run the spacer/shim. I dont think I make enough HP for it to be a big problem. Am I crazy for that thought?

__________________
1978 Pontiac Trans Am 400 WS6

Comp XE262
Functional Shaker Hood
Tribal Tubes Tri-Y Headers
Pypes Crossflow exhaust
  #19  
Old 05-17-2024, 02:06 PM
Tim Corcoran's Avatar
Tim Corcoran Tim Corcoran is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Willow Spring, North Carolina
Posts: 4,746
Default

Before you do anything make a plan. What are your performance goals and how much do you plan on spending on the upgrades. Your car will run fine keeping your 2.56 gears it just won't accelerate as fast as it would with lower gears. My point is if you stick with the 2.56 gears don't over cam it or it will perform worse than stock. You have to look at the complete package. If you get eheads and a big cam now you need lower gears and headers too, oh now you need new 2-1/2 exhaust pipes and turbo mufflers. Now you need suspension and brakes to be up to the increase in power, will your trans now take the power and will that 10 bolt rear hold up to the increase power. Don't forget about the high stall converter too. How much will all this cost what have you got yourself into and when your done will you still enjoy driving this loud gas guzzling machine and maybe you will blow up the short block because it's old and tired and not up to all these upgrades. Just giving you some things to consider before you start buying parts. Good luck

__________________
Tim Corcoran
  #20  
Old 05-17-2024, 02:08 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,633
Default

Remember with a gear change you will need a different posi carrier. 2.41 and 2.56 used on , 2.73 up take another. Having ripped all the ring gear bolts out of my high school Impala not knowing it had a spacer plate I'm a little gun shy! I probably have an extra factory carrier but an Eaton 28 spline is stouter and probably better shipping . Check with Tom's Differentials.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017