Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-14-2018, 08:50 PM
punkin punkin is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 300
Default #13 Heads

Hello all,

I picked up a really clean set of #13 heads a few weeks ago. The price was too good to pass up. I really don't know much about them except they do have screw in studs. It appears as though there has been some mild bowl and runner work on them but nothing really aggressive.

Any thoughts on using these on a performance street built 455 (462)?


Thanks,

  #2  
Old 03-14-2018, 08:52 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Crosby, TX (East of Houston)/Texas/USA
Posts: 2,062
Default

You'll need dished pistons. I've cc'ed 3 sets in my life, all were around 77cc's. Very good for compression on a 400, but WAY too high for a 455 with typical flat-top pistons (unless you are going to run E85).

__________________
'73 T/A (clone). Low budget stock headed 8.3:1 455, 222/242 116lsa .443/.435 cam. FAST Sportsman EFI, 315rwhp/385rwtq on 87 octane. 13.12 @103.2, 1.91 60'.

'67 Firebird [sold], ; 11.27 @ 119.61, 7.167 @ 96.07, with UD 280/280 (108LSA/ 109 ICL)solid cam. [1.537, 7.233 @93.61, 11.46 @ 115.4 w/ old UD 288/296 108 hydraulic cam] Feb '05 HPP, home-ported "16" D-ports, dished pistons (pump gas only), 3.42 gears, 275/60 DR's, 750DP, T2, full exhaust
  #3  
Old 03-14-2018, 08:59 PM
PunchT37's Avatar
PunchT37 PunchT37 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lafayette,LA
Posts: 3,260
Default

Yep. I ran 62 heads on a 455. Had to run 100LL gas in it. 13's and 62's are basically the same thing.

  #4  
Old 03-14-2018, 09:11 PM
punkin punkin is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 300
Default

Thanks a bunch guys.

  #5  
Old 03-15-2018, 06:03 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,841
Default

13s flow better then the casting 64s that came on the first 455s in 1970 and they have a bit more Intake port volume also which helps with the 455.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #6  
Old 03-15-2018, 07:17 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,027
Default

Excellent head for a 389 or 400 build, but not for a 455. The 13's will have larger chambers like the 62's did. Most I've cc'd here were closer to 78cc than 72cc. Different story for their #12 counterparts used on the manual transmission 400's that year. Those have much smaller chambers.

In any case I'm not a big fan of using a huge dished piston to lower the compression on a 455 build just to use the early small chamber heads on them. Far better to use a flat top piston and larger chamber, then take steps to establish very tight squish instead........Cliff

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #7  
Old 03-15-2018, 10:40 AM
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Crosby, TX (East of Houston)/Texas/USA
Posts: 2,062
Default

FWIW, the 455 in my old '67 Firebird (in signature) had Speed Pro pistons with a rather large dish machined into them, so that I could run pump gas with the 72cc "16" D-ports.

I was worried about the pistons being so much thinner. I used very fine sandpaper to smooth over the sharp edges, then applied a thermal barrier coating to the tops of those pistons. Although I sold the car 12 years ago, the new owner and I have a mutual friend whom I talk to about once a year, and last he mentioned it was still running!

That said, I agree with Cliff, and would rather use a flat top and heads with a proper chamber size. But I had limited options when I built that motor, ~20 years ago.

__________________
'73 T/A (clone). Low budget stock headed 8.3:1 455, 222/242 116lsa .443/.435 cam. FAST Sportsman EFI, 315rwhp/385rwtq on 87 octane. 13.12 @103.2, 1.91 60'.

'67 Firebird [sold], ; 11.27 @ 119.61, 7.167 @ 96.07, with UD 280/280 (108LSA/ 109 ICL)solid cam. [1.537, 7.233 @93.61, 11.46 @ 115.4 w/ old UD 288/296 108 hydraulic cam] Feb '05 HPP, home-ported "16" D-ports, dished pistons (pump gas only), 3.42 gears, 275/60 DR's, 750DP, T2, full exhaust
  #8  
Old 03-15-2018, 10:56 AM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,910
Default

Yep, I've machined dishes in these things before, works fine that way.

This little pure stock 400 with 12's and 3.31 gear has a mild dish to keep compression friendly, has no trouble making enough power to push the bird (@ 3,840 lbs) to bottom 13's on a warm day. Pass corrects to a 12.78 @ 106. Just need the weather to cooperate.

https://youtu.be/er1z7PpqsnY

  #9  
Old 03-15-2018, 12:02 PM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,027
Default

"at said, I agree with Cliff, and would rather use a flat top and heads with a proper chamber size. But I had limited options when I built that motor, ~20 years ago."

The ONLY 455 engine built/dyno'd here that came up short on power for the combination of parts used dished pistons and small chamber heads. Everything else was in place, tight squish, etc, but it just didn't make the grade on the dyno compared to nearly identical engines we had done previously. Even with that said it made good power, but with all the stops out and our best tuning efforts came up about 30hp/45ft lbs short of where it should have been.........FWIW.......Cliff

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #10  
Old 03-15-2018, 01:13 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,910
Default

I don't think I'm giving up anything when compared to other factory stock RAIII's that are actually running more gear than I am, and most likely more compression.

Matter of fact, I'm pretty confident that with more gear in the car, I'd be right on par with the quickest of the RAIII's that are currently competing.

  #11  
Old 03-16-2018, 02:34 AM
Squidward's Avatar
Squidward Squidward is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 4,383
Default

Go get a pair of 6x's for your 462. Put the #13's on a 350, and put it in a truck.


__________________
"...ridge reamer and ring compressor? Do they have tools like that?"
  #12  
Old 03-16-2018, 02:54 AM
'ol Pinion head 'ol Pinion head is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: INJUN Territory, Red State Merica!
Posts: 9,597
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulajones View Post
I don't think I'm giving up anything when compared to other factory stock RAIII's that are actually running more gear than I am, and most likely more compression.

Matter of fact, I'm pretty confident that with more gear in the car, I'd be right on par with the quickest of the RAIII's that are currently competing.
Jones, can you relate what cam you are running in your '70 RAIII Formula?

__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms.
  #13  
Old 03-16-2018, 10:27 AM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,910
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squidward View Post
Go get a pair of 6x's for your 462. Put the #13's on a 350, and put it in a truck.

funny chit!!

  #14  
Old 03-16-2018, 10:36 AM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,910
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 'ol Pinion head View Post
Jones, can you relate what cam you are running in your '70 RAIII Formula?
I'm running the stock blue print 068 cam from Melling here....

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/m...w/make/Pontiac

  #15  
Old 03-16-2018, 11:13 AM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,626
Default

HO Racing even sold TRWs with a dish machined for using smaller chamber heads.

"The ONLY 455 engine built/dyno'd here that came up short on power for the combination of parts used dished pistons and small chamber heads. Everything else was in place, tight squish, etc, but it just didn't make the grade on the dyno compared to nearly identical engines we had done previously. Even with that said it made good power, but with all the stops out and our best tuning efforts came up about 30hp/45ft lbs short of where it should have been.........FWIW.......Cliff "

I think we can have a wide variability of factors that can do the same thing. Look at all the guys that have tried to copy Jim Hand's motor same cam heads etc. that were way off performance.

When I built my first 455 using fairly stock RAIV heads we dropped the piston down almost .100 to kill compression-still needed some race gas in it. UD 288/296 HFT, HO intake, Q jet 2" Hookers. It ran so well on a very conservative dyno the machinist built a very similar 455 with ported 6X heads, 0 deck, same cam, an HO intake and Q jet that was 30 HP off mine so go figure-no quench at .100 down, head flow probably a little better with the RAIVs and the rest the same made more HP.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #16  
Old 03-16-2018, 11:34 AM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,626
Default

That 455 made enough HP to run 117-118 mph weighing 3900 lbs.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #17  
Old 03-16-2018, 11:56 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,841
Default

I don't think there's anything cut in stone with regards to how factors / things are intertwined with the 455 and it's fast piston speed due to its Bore to stroke Ratio and how it makes the cylinder pressure rise with different Cams!
Your example of having the Pistons .100" down in the hole and the relation of how air flow balances against compression makes it clear that the 4.210" stroke makes the 455 demand high levels of air flow to make great power more then it's needs for compression!

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #18  
Old 03-16-2018, 03:19 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,626
Default

It was a rattling fool in the summer if I did not have enough race gas in it! Autocrossed the heck out of it and then ran in in the old NMCA Modified stock class until they dropped it and I could not run RAIV heads on a 455 and switched to a 400 short block.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #19  
Old 03-16-2018, 03:24 PM
slowbird's Avatar
slowbird slowbird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Montgomery, IL
Posts: 10,659
Default

From my personal experience small chmber and dish piston was the way to go. Made huge power. Every engine is different though

  #20  
Old 03-16-2018, 06:27 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,910
Default

While we're on the subject, Tony had these dish pistons made for dads combo, in conjunction with the old bathtub combustion chamber Edelbrocks that he opened up to 89cc.

Compression is a pump gas friendly 10.84:1 and it only wanted 34 degrees of timing for best power.


Last edited by Formulajones; 07-20-2018 at 02:36 PM.
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:17 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017