Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-11-2016, 11:24 PM
Slick Poncho Slick Poncho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 68
Default Exhaust X pipe size

Wondering if my exhaust X pipe is a restriction. Long story short I wheeled into test and tune Friday night a little late and didn't have much time to prepare for my first pass and ended up running through the full exhaust where as I would normally open my electric cut outs located on the back of my pypes 2.5" X pipe. The car went 12.00 through the exhaust, the next pass no other changes other than opening cut outs went 11.86. This got me wondering if my X pipe is possibly a restriction. The car is a 72 lemans sport 428+.030, forged rods/Pistons, comp xr288hr (236-242 110lsa,)using endurex solid roller lifters,kre d ports with mild port work, worked t2,1"open spacer, 950 Holley, hooker super comp 1 7/8 to 3" collector reduced right down to a complete 2.5" pypes stainless exhaust. Anyone else see any gains going to a 3" X pipe even with cutouts on the 2.5"??

  #2  
Old 09-12-2016, 12:41 AM
Mikes455Wagon's Avatar
Mikes455Wagon Mikes455Wagon is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ECPTTFMF!
Posts: 887
Default

I have always heard to maintain collector diameter thru the X. My collectors are 3.5" and the x pipe is also 3.5". I have long tapered reducers after the x to 3" mufflers and saw no real loss of performance compared to open exhaust.

  #3  
Old 09-12-2016, 09:40 AM
455TA's Avatar
455TA 455TA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 166
Default

What was your 1/8 mile times? I have the same cam, 305 cfm round port e heads, performer rpm intake with no spacer, 1 7/8 inch dougs headers with 3.5 inch collector into 3 inch x pipe. I run 7.40's in the 1/8th at 94 mph with a 3.42 gear and 2600 stall. I think you have a restriction for sure.

__________________

1980 Trans Am - Street/Strip 462
Best: 7.08@95 with 1.49 60' in the 1/8th. 11.17@119.8 in the 1/4. N/A, 3700 lbs, 3.42's, Pump Gas.

Admin of Pure Pontiac Powered Outlaws on Facebook.
  #4  
Old 09-12-2016, 09:42 AM
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Crosby, TX (East of Houston)/Texas/USA
Posts: 2,062
Default

2.5" pipes are, IMHO, small for your combination. If you cutouts are PAST the X, then you really didn't test whether the X is a restriction or not. I would not run less than 3" on motor such as yours.

Either the rest of your exhaust system is a restriction, or your carb is tuned rich (opening the cutouts leaned it out some, improving the AFR).

__________________
'73 T/A (clone). Low budget stock headed 8.3:1 455, 222/242 116lsa .443/.435 cam. FAST Sportsman EFI, 315rwhp/385rwtq on 87 octane. 13.12 @103.2, 1.91 60'.

'67 Firebird [sold], ; 11.27 @ 119.61, 7.167 @ 96.07, with UD 280/280 (108LSA/ 109 ICL)solid cam. [1.537, 7.233 @93.61, 11.46 @ 115.4 w/ old UD 288/296 108 hydraulic cam] Feb '05 HPP, home-ported "16" D-ports, dished pistons (pump gas only), 3.42 gears, 275/60 DR's, 750DP, T2, full exhaust
  #5  
Old 09-12-2016, 12:10 PM
Slick Poncho Slick Poncho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 68
Default

1/8 mile was 7.48@90.5 with the cutouts opened up. I'm aware I didn't test if the X pipe is a restriction, I was wondering if it's worth my time to disconnect the pipes at the header, sounds like it is. I feel like this combo is capable of mid 11's or so. I don't get out as often as I'd like to so my tuning process is slow. My intentions are to mess with carb and timing this week if I make it. I'm running a 200-4R and 3.90 gear,continental 10", 28" tires. 60ft times are typically 1.60-1.62

  #6  
Old 09-12-2016, 01:35 PM
ta man ta man is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Clinton,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 5,366
Default

I'd step up to 3 inch..On my car with 3 inch exhaust..I had 2.5 inch mandrel tailpipes..many thought they weren't a restriction..but I took them off and picked up a full tenth...

__________________

466 Mike Voycey shortblock, 310cfm SD KRE heads, SD "OF 2.0 cam", torker 2
373 gears 3200 Continental Convertor
best et 10.679/127.5/1.533 60ft
308 gears best et 10.76/125.64/1.5471
  #7  
Old 09-18-2016, 10:05 AM
Slick Poncho Slick Poncho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 68
Default

Ran Friday night with X pipe removed and just a turn down bolted to header. Car actually slowed up to 11.91. Only other change was I ran my 28-10.50 slicks instead of my 295-55-15 mt et SS since I hauled it in anyway figured may as well run slicks. The plugs do look a tad lean, I will bump up a jet or two and see what's up this weekend. This car is making me beat my head against the wall. Installed a fiberglass front bumper and hood and first outing on a cool September night it barely runs any better than at Norwalk in 90 degree humid air.

  #8  
Old 09-18-2016, 12:42 PM
BruceWilkie BruceWilkie is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 9,132
Default

Couple things to look at...

You can generally support 500 hp with a dual 2.5" exhaust before it becomes a restriction to making more. 3" will get you to @700 hp before it can start getting difficult to find gains.

Any pipe beyond your collector flange(rest of ex system) changes the collectors effective range. Some lengths will actually kill power because the reflected waves will arrive back at the ex port at the worst time.

Losing restriction often leans mixture but be sure you are reading your plugs correctly.

You can easily find bottle necks in your ex system by taking pressure readings at various points. harder to make the test points but overall not too challenging.

You can do a systems approach and put expansion chambers between tuned open headers and a quieting system behind the expansion capable of adequate flow thru it. The expansion chamber volume needs to be double or more ci per side. Make expansion entry as large as practical. The sudden large increase in area and volume "fools" the engine into "thinking" its open atmosphere. A 500 ci that expansion area could be a pair of boxes 4x9x14 or larger or oval/cone shape at same or greater volume.
Obviously under chassis real estate determines what you can do.

  #9  
Old 09-18-2016, 12:53 PM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 6,380
Default

If the car went slower with open headers, why would the exhaust system be a problem?

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
  #10  
Old 09-18-2016, 01:11 PM
BruceWilkie BruceWilkie is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 9,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PAUL K View Post
If the car went slower with open headers, why would the exhaust system be a problem?
C'mon Paul there are plenty of reasons why... most often its both collector length and the overall effect on tuneup. He was running exhaust with dumps on his x pipe with better results. Then slows down with only open turn down off collector. hes changed effective collector length which may be worse length than before and hasnt verified the tune to see what may or may not need adjusting.

  #11  
Old 09-18-2016, 02:42 PM
Slick Poncho Slick Poncho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 68
Default

I had a local engine builder tell me they use a collector and strait piece of pipe equal in diameter with a painted stripe down the side of it. They make a pass and the point the paint is burnt off to Is where they cut the pipe off at. I figured this would br a cheap try anyway, any thoughts? I like the idea of the box, having room may be a issue, an exhaust will have to back on at some point for street driving whether it's the 2.5" or a 3" is still the real question.

  #12  
Old 09-18-2016, 02:49 PM
slowbird's Avatar
slowbird slowbird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Montgomery, IL
Posts: 10,662
Default

I see one big change that no one seems to be pointing out. He removed the radials and went to bias-ply. That is a loss of et and mph. Who knows what the exhaust change did vs the tire change?? It was a mistake taking the radials off

  #13  
Old 09-18-2016, 03:01 PM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 6,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceWilkie View Post
C'mon Paul there are plenty of reasons why... most often its both collector length and the overall effect on tuneup. He was running exhaust with dumps on his x pipe with better results. Then slows down with only open turn down off collector. hes changed effective collector length which may be worse length than before and hasnt verified the tune to see what may or may not need adjusting.
Bruce the OP feels his engine is off by half of a second. He's ran it with a decent exhaust and with open headers and found little difference. Do you really think he will find a half second gain in the exhaust?

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
  #14  
Old 09-18-2016, 03:06 PM
BruceWilkie BruceWilkie is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 9,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slowbird View Post
I see one big change that no one seems to be pointing out. He removed the radials and went to bias-ply. That is a loss of et and mph. Who knows what the exhaust change did vs the tire change?? It was a mistake taking the radials off
Good catch! Focus on one thing at a time. Just know sometimes one thing alone may net you a loss untill you try another thing to compliment it. Holds true with suspension, drivetrain as well.

  #15  
Old 09-18-2016, 03:24 PM
slowbird's Avatar
slowbird slowbird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Montgomery, IL
Posts: 10,662
Default

Fyi a good exhaust should show very little change in et/mph on or off. I ran 9.0@147 with and with exhaust.

  #16  
Old 09-18-2016, 03:25 PM
Slick Poncho Slick Poncho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 68
Default

My mistake, I had no clue there is that much difference between the radials and slicks. I intended going back to radials this weekend anyway so that's what I will do. I'm not sure if I'm off by half second of et, finding guys with pontiacs at the track to talk to is hard to come by let alone someone with a 428 combo. Lots of 460+ci combos similar that seem to be in the low 11 territory.

  #17  
Old 09-18-2016, 03:35 PM
slowbird's Avatar
slowbird slowbird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Montgomery, IL
Posts: 10,662
Default

My guess is you'll run slower with the x-pipe off but you need to test. Also try to test it all in the same day to limit weather difference as a variable.

  #18  
Old 09-18-2016, 06:01 PM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,046
Default

From the testing I've done here these engines LOVE big head pipes, X, H, or nothing it doesn't matter. I would use nothing before the mufflers less than 3" for any reason.

On the same topic it doesn't seem to matter much what you use after the mufflers, I've seen NOTHING (in terms of ET or MPH) with the same exact headers/3" "H" pipes and straight thru 3" mufflers using 3" turn downs, crappy 2.5" full length tail pipes, and really nice mandrel bent 2.5" tail pipes.

I would also say here that there is a HUGE difference in interior/exterior noise, and inside the car resonance with different tail pipes, but that's usually not a big deal over hear in the "Race" section.....FWIW.....Cliff

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #19  
Old 09-18-2016, 06:31 PM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,456
Default

Something to consider, a Dr. Gas X-type crossover that is 3-1/2" from the collectors to the mufflers is VERY heavy !


.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE
  #20  
Old 09-18-2016, 08:35 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,662
Default

FWIW my car ran almost identical times when I had the 455 roller motor and loose convertor in it with open exhaust and no mufflers or tailpipes even on as it did with a 3" Dr. Gas X into 3" Ultraflows and 3" Torque Tech tailpipes even with that additional weight. 6.90s @ 99 in the 1/8

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:24 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017