[mike leech]

This is a good looking option for guys wanting something differant. Someone should really do a high level build with these. Hit up bill on FB

https://m.facebook.com/groups/793754...61341475760378

[Tom Vaught]

Seems like we have heard this song before somewhere (and then the music died)

Tom V.

[Anderson Port Development]

Originally Posted by mike leech

This is a good looking option for guys wanting something differant. Someone should really do a high level build with these. Hit up bill on FB

https://m.facebook.com/groups/793754...61341475760378

... thanks Mike ...

[ponjohn]

What account is that FB account?

[mike leech]

Midwest pontiacs i think.

[Tom Vaught]

Midwest Pontiacs? Like Missouri or Kansas? Wonder if those are Clay Phillips heads?

Tom V.

[Anderson Port Development]

Originally Posted by ponjohn

What account is that FB account?

... that the Pontiac MidWest Connection Forum on FB, the Drag Racers Page is still a closed group for now, but may change soon ...

... but for anyone interested they can contact myself or Roland for details ...
(Roland) 417-209-7395
(Bill) 407-951-0410

... the new CV-1.1's complete pair are $3500.00 ... they come std. with 2.15/1.73 valve set and flow in the 360's out of the box with 277cc intake port ... there has been a bunch of extra material added to the as cast head and the new porters casting as well, for multiple CNC port options, up to a 370cc runner with a 2.375 valve that goes 480cfm, and another nice upgrade is the ability to machine the new 1.1 heads for an 18 head bolt upgrade from a simple CNC program ...

[Tom Vaught]

Thanks for the update on the FB Pontiac MidWest Connection Forum.

Have a good year Bill.

Tom V.

[Anderson Port Development]

... this is my 428 stock block combo, still used the ArmaSteel crankshaft and std. demension Pontiac rods, JE Pistons with 10.6 to 1 compression, Solid Roller with SD's full mega brace installed, my custom ex-SB2 Nascar headers flanged for the round port Pontiac, Roland Racing's new 2pc stud girdle with Comp's 1.7 Ultra rockers, this engine also had my new drive system hangin on it for testing and it performed perfectly, except for the Vac Pump, we ended up making the clearences too loose for this test, but that's being addressed currently for this engine's next dyno session ...

... The heads are a special set that i installed the CV-1.1's entry level CNC program, which bumps volume up to 290cc and this same head with our large valve big bore chamber actually goes almost 440cfm, but on the small 4.155 bore on this engine they flow 410cfm ...

... i've been a little concerned about the size of this port on 434c.i. at a fairly low compression, but further testing will show if i'm right or not, but this engine did not let us down as it made 715hp on 93 octane fuel and well under 30 degrees of total timing, the new CVI-1R finally got to be tested on this engine and unfortunately we did not have the matching CNC program for the ports in these heads, so it was run out of the box, which was quite a bit smaller than the CV-290 intake port being used, but we didn't have a choice and ran it anyways, this manifold actually extended the HP peak by 100rpm and lowered the torque peak 400rpm over the other prototype manifold that i originally built for the 428, which is a really nice piece in it's own right, so we were very pleased with the CVI-1R's results...

... but we're looking forward to testing this engine further with a different set of heads and see what she does ...

[WARPed]

Glad to see the new CV1.1 head is taking shape. On my CV1.0's I was able to make 906hp on my 535 with the standard low rise intake & 1050(gas) so for many that my be all they need. On the other hand the "R" manifold (only port matched) gave us 940hp & ~50 ft/lbs with the same carb. so I see great potential with the newest manifold.

[Anderson Port Development]

Originally Posted by WARPed

Glad to see the new CV1.1 head is taking shape. On my CV1.0's I was able to make 906hp on my 535 with the standard low rise intake & 1050(gas) so for many that my be all they need. On the other hand the "R" manifold (only port matched) gave us 940hp & ~50 ft/lbs with the same carb. so I see great potential with the newest manifold.

... very nice work Alex, we're looking forward to seeing where you end up with your combo, the surface is just getting scratched with the R manifold, we hope it to be an extremely versatile manifold, and i mispoke, your engine was the 1st to test the R manifold, not my 428 ...

[Tom Vaught]

Is your engine a Nitrous Engine Alex?

If it is you are making the same power with your engine the guy with the Pontiac engine in the Mustang was making with a two 4 intake and dual dominators. His was a NOS engine. Good Job!

Tom V.

[WARPed]

Originally Posted by Tom Vaught

Is your engine a Nitrous Engine Alex?

If it is you are making the same power with your engine the guy with the Pontiac engine in the Mustang was making with a two 4 intake and dual dominators. His was a NOS engine. Good Job!

Tom V.

Thanks Tom, This is only an NA motor with 13.4cr - stock 48mm cam 276/285 114ls - .750 lift via 1.76 rockers, headers are 2.125" x 4" & 28 deg total timing. EFI will be next so to have the flexibility of fuels. We lifted a ringland with VP-C85 and a 1250 carb with an easy pull we made 957hp @ 6500 & 838ft/lbs @ 5600 so it looks like we should pick up a bit with the 2000 cfm throttle body.

A note to anyone considering using VP's C-85 fuel - it is only E60 not the implied E85 and is a very unforgiving fuel and well known to lift ringlands of which I found out too late.

[Tom Vaught]

Had to ask as the low compression ratio did hurt the other guy on the dyno some.

Still with the efi and a 2000 cfm T/B you will be moving a bunch more air and the tune-up will be a bunch easier vs getting your hands in gasoline constantly.

Charlie66 found that deal out when he went EFI.

Tom V.

[BruceWilkie]

I really like the 2 piece intake. Makes porting a cast intake a whole bunch easier. Nice numbers for 93 octane and 434 cubes.

[Anderson Port Development]

Originally Posted by BruceWilkie

I really like the 2 piece intake. Makes porting a cast intake a whole bunch easier. Nice numbers for 93 octane and 434 cubes.

... thanks Bruce, it had some room for improvement, but i was happy with it, can't wait to see what the as cast stuff does on there and some freakin' vacuum ...

[S/st 54]

Originally Posted by Anderson Port Development

... thanks Bruce, it had some room for improvement, but i was happy with it, can't wait to see what the as cast stuff does on there and some freakin' vacuum ...

Ata boy! No doubt you worked hard on this stuff a while back. Glad to hear it was finally blowing smoke On the dyno.Maybe one of these days another 2-3 years down the road you'll actually have it on the track! Congrats again! Progress is great...... My definition of progress is:Over a long LOOOOOONG period of time.....but your doing a outstanding job with it!Keep up the good work!!!!!!

[Jack Gifford]

Originally Posted by S/st 54

... another 2-3 years down the road you'll actually have it on the track...

??? With no "tone of voice" in these forums, it's difficult to differentiate sarcasm from honest intent...

[S/st 54]

Originally Posted by Jack Gifford

??? With no "tone of voice" in these forums, it's difficult to differentiate sarcasm from honest intent...

700hp with a stock block motor is a nice milestone IMO. He did a good job.
Can't wait to see what it does in his car...on the track!

[Blued and Painted]

I must have entered the Twilight Zone where sights, sounds, and time slips are blurred.