Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2010, 06:51 PM
BILTIT's Avatar
BILTIT BILTIT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sask, canada
Posts: 3,777
Default TBI pontiac off 454?

Has anyone tried to use a 454TBI unit on a pontiac? Would need a custom chip im sure but would seem to be an easy conversion otherwise. Using Megasquirt would make it pretty painless.

__________________
Derek B.
Current best: 11.97@110 1.65-60' !!!

'74 ventura, (Fired july 14/06) '74 462 4-bolt (9.5-1), SCAT, Ross, T-II w/850DP (shaker455), TH350, Conti 10'' 3800, Supercomps, Magnaflow, 3'' Pypes, 3.73's, 28x13.5-15 ET streets.

1970 Beismeyer 17' flatbottom vdrive, 11.8:1 455P, ported heads, dual Qjet tunnel ram.
  #2  
Old 01-05-2010, 07:46 PM
PONTIAC LARRY's Avatar
PONTIAC LARRY PONTIAC LARRY is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Republic of Texas , Ellis County
Posts: 2,112
Default

I always wanted to try one on a mild 455 with like 6x-8's and a Summit 2802 cam..lots of vacuum , might work with a stock computer chip. Surely would with like an 068 cam... It would be a great setup on a land barge cruiser

__________________
63 Catalina coupe 467 cid budget drag car 11's 1/4 , 7.20 1/8th pump gas n/a
66 Star Chief Executive 57k mile
69 Le Mans 2 dr HT 350 85k mile 15 sec 1/4
69 Firebird 400 Burgandy/Black
70 Olds Rallye 350 F85 4 speed 3.91's
70 Olds Cutlass Cruiser Red Wagon 350 101k miles 15 sec 1/4 12 sec w 455
74 Cheyenne Super C10 LWB Gen 6 454 w ZZ502 cam 3.07gear 13.1 1/4, 8.3 1/8
2020 RAM 1500 SLT 4x4 5.7 A8 Hemi
2007 Hummer H3 3.7 liter turd
2019 Chevy Spark petrol car 38 mpg
  #3  
Old 01-05-2010, 08:19 PM
BILTIT's Avatar
BILTIT BILTIT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sask, canada
Posts: 3,777
Default

Yup, i plan on putting a 400 into my 80 chev silverado. TBI would make it even better.

__________________
Derek B.
Current best: 11.97@110 1.65-60' !!!

'74 ventura, (Fired july 14/06) '74 462 4-bolt (9.5-1), SCAT, Ross, T-II w/850DP (shaker455), TH350, Conti 10'' 3800, Supercomps, Magnaflow, 3'' Pypes, 3.73's, 28x13.5-15 ET streets.

1970 Beismeyer 17' flatbottom vdrive, 11.8:1 455P, ported heads, dual Qjet tunnel ram.
  #4  
Old 01-05-2010, 08:34 PM
ponjohn's Avatar
ponjohn ponjohn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 9,544
Default

I proposed this on PZ using a marine MFI upper intake. You would then have to fab a lower intake to use the upper.

The issue with the EFI intakes sold today for the poncho is there is not enough plenum area. I consulted with two custom intake companies and they concurred that the plenum area is very important for an N/A application.

An example of a good efi intake with plenum area is Jack Blume's. Here is a picture.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	underhood1new.jpg
Views:	259
Size:	81.2 KB
ID:	192912  

  #5  
Old 01-05-2010, 09:15 PM
BILTIT's Avatar
BILTIT BILTIT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sask, canada
Posts: 3,777
Default

Ponjohn- i can understand with multiport injection then a custom intake would work best but for a throttle body unit, all we can do is put it on a carb intake.

Ex. I look at my 93 chev 1 ton with a TBI 350, intake looks like a standard carb intake.

Why couldnt a person swap a TBI unit off a chevy on to a pontiac intake and have a chip burnt or use megasquirt. Seems too easy to be true. I guess most people just take the extra step and go multiport.

__________________
Derek B.
Current best: 11.97@110 1.65-60' !!!

'74 ventura, (Fired july 14/06) '74 462 4-bolt (9.5-1), SCAT, Ross, T-II w/850DP (shaker455), TH350, Conti 10'' 3800, Supercomps, Magnaflow, 3'' Pypes, 3.73's, 28x13.5-15 ET streets.

1970 Beismeyer 17' flatbottom vdrive, 11.8:1 455P, ported heads, dual Qjet tunnel ram.
  #6  
Old 01-05-2010, 09:24 PM
6 Grrrs's Avatar
6 Grrrs 6 Grrrs is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greensburg, PA
Posts: 1,681
Default

My 1990 454SS (last year for GenIV in a production vehicle) came from the factory with a Qjet (spreadbore) intake manifold with a TBI spacer attached to it. In 1991 they went with a TBI intake on the Gen V motors.

__________________
Tod Hoffmann

1966 GTO Montero Red Hardtop - Holley EFI'd 462, KRE DPorts/Muncie 4spd
1990 Chevy 454SS pickup - Accel DFI/T56 6spd - Hot Rod Power Tour Long Hauler
1996 Chevy K2500 ECSB 'Poopy'
2002 Honda VTX1800C
2016 Cadillac CTS Premium

My project thread: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=516826

  #7  
Old 01-06-2010, 07:31 AM
Mr_GTO's Avatar
Mr_GTO Mr_GTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sarasota FL
Posts: 3,006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponjohn View Post
I proposed this on PZ using a marine MFI upper intake. You would then have to fab a lower intake to use the upper.

The issue with the EFI intakes sold today for the poncho is there is not enough plenum area. I consulted with two custom intake companies and they concurred that the plenum area is very important for an N/A application.

An example of a good efi intake with plenum area is Jack Blume's. Here is a picture.
Not enough plenum area? Wouldn't that be the case for carb'd versions as well? All EFI intakes are just modified carb intakes but instead of flowing fuel and air through the intake it just flows air and fuel is introduced right into the head.

  #8  
Old 01-06-2010, 07:28 PM
PONTIAC LARRY's Avatar
PONTIAC LARRY PONTIAC LARRY is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Republic of Texas , Ellis County
Posts: 2,112
Default

We are just talking about a simple TBI spacer/adapter that is readily available cheap and fits a standard 4 barrel intake.. ie: a regular Performer intake would be perfect.
If the vacuum readings are the same or at least very close to the stock 454 or 350 application (depending on which TBI and computer your using) , there should be no reason at all to have to get a custom chip. A peanut port 454 and a stock head Pont 455 or 400 should also be very similar on demands for air/fuel mixture.. lean and mean !!! TORQUEY and great cold starts and driveability too... Just use a stock or near stock camshaft.. 400 with a 066 or 067 cam...very good match...

__________________
63 Catalina coupe 467 cid budget drag car 11's 1/4 , 7.20 1/8th pump gas n/a
66 Star Chief Executive 57k mile
69 Le Mans 2 dr HT 350 85k mile 15 sec 1/4
69 Firebird 400 Burgandy/Black
70 Olds Rallye 350 F85 4 speed 3.91's
70 Olds Cutlass Cruiser Red Wagon 350 101k miles 15 sec 1/4 12 sec w 455
74 Cheyenne Super C10 LWB Gen 6 454 w ZZ502 cam 3.07gear 13.1 1/4, 8.3 1/8
2020 RAM 1500 SLT 4x4 5.7 A8 Hemi
2007 Hummer H3 3.7 liter turd
2019 Chevy Spark petrol car 38 mpg
  #9  
Old 01-07-2010, 06:09 PM
mudbird's Avatar
mudbird mudbird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 213
Default

Well for what it is worth... My daily driver is a 93 k3500 with a TBI 454 and it usually gets about 10 mpg. (empty or hauling my 69 bird on a trailer or my sled trailer makes no difference) I like the TBI system's they are cheap and easy to maintain but do not get that great of mpg in my op. I often say that my 850 demon in the bird uses less gas, certainly at idle but it is a heavy truck.

I lurk at the thirdgen.org boards and they have a great TBI forum with some great modified TBI set ups. They often use a dual plane with an adapter and use the 454 throttlebody when they need more air in a small block, The holley ones are considered not much gain for the money. Lots of good info there if you are into this idea.

I think it would be kind of cool on a Pontiac motor with a 4l80 and Flash EBL from Dynamic EFI in the computer for programing. It may be cheap to do but I do not think the mpg would be much better than a good carb set up. I do like the TBI and think of them as a speed density two barrel

__________________
MudBird
  #10  
Old 01-07-2010, 06:41 PM
BILTIT's Avatar
BILTIT BILTIT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sask, canada
Posts: 3,777
Default

Mudbird, good info thanks.

I have also seen many guys run the 454TBI on modified smallblocks for the increased air/fuel flow.

My thoughts: Up here we have some very cold days (-40C/F) and my automatic choke Q-jet on my 350sbc ('80 chev 3/4T) never works worth a crap. It is a bear to start even when plugged in. I am planning a 400P swap into this truck and think the TBI would be sooooooooo much nicer for cold start and overall driveability. The truck is lifted 6'', 4.56 gears and running 36'' tires: therefore, gas mileage really doesnt matter.

Just seems like an easy swap without getting into too many money items needed like the multiport setup.

__________________
Derek B.
Current best: 11.97@110 1.65-60' !!!

'74 ventura, (Fired july 14/06) '74 462 4-bolt (9.5-1), SCAT, Ross, T-II w/850DP (shaker455), TH350, Conti 10'' 3800, Supercomps, Magnaflow, 3'' Pypes, 3.73's, 28x13.5-15 ET streets.

1970 Beismeyer 17' flatbottom vdrive, 11.8:1 455P, ported heads, dual Qjet tunnel ram.
  #11  
Old 01-07-2010, 08:06 PM
mudbird's Avatar
mudbird mudbird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 213
Default

I do agree, the cold start is much better.
You may be able to get one to work with the stock programing. I would make sure to run the correct fuel pump for the application as I hear they are higher than the 305/350 motors.

__________________
MudBird
  #12  
Old 01-07-2010, 09:20 PM
6 Grrrs's Avatar
6 Grrrs 6 Grrrs is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greensburg, PA
Posts: 1,681
Default

http://www.tbichips.com/ can burn you a chip easily.

He did one for me a few years ago when I put a TBI 454 into a 350 dually that originally came with a 4L80E. It took a few tries, but he was easy to work with & willing to make things correct. I put a cam/intake/headers & full 3" exhaust on that truck & we had issues with getting good economy & performance. The best towing economy we could get without losing performance was 8mpg. That was if you kept your foot out of it. It would also smoke the duallys thru 2nd gear. We got the towing mileage up to 10, but the truck felt kinda sluggish.

__________________
Tod Hoffmann

1966 GTO Montero Red Hardtop - Holley EFI'd 462, KRE DPorts/Muncie 4spd
1990 Chevy 454SS pickup - Accel DFI/T56 6spd - Hot Rod Power Tour Long Hauler
1996 Chevy K2500 ECSB 'Poopy'
2002 Honda VTX1800C
2016 Cadillac CTS Premium

My project thread: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=516826

  #13  
Old 01-08-2010, 03:32 PM
PONTIAC LARRY's Avatar
PONTIAC LARRY PONTIAC LARRY is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Republic of Texas , Ellis County
Posts: 2,112
Default

My dads old 93 Suburban 1500 2wd with 275,000+ miles pulled of 18 mpg hwy with original stock 350 stuff when I took a trip to Houston a while back..

__________________
63 Catalina coupe 467 cid budget drag car 11's 1/4 , 7.20 1/8th pump gas n/a
66 Star Chief Executive 57k mile
69 Le Mans 2 dr HT 350 85k mile 15 sec 1/4
69 Firebird 400 Burgandy/Black
70 Olds Rallye 350 F85 4 speed 3.91's
70 Olds Cutlass Cruiser Red Wagon 350 101k miles 15 sec 1/4 12 sec w 455
74 Cheyenne Super C10 LWB Gen 6 454 w ZZ502 cam 3.07gear 13.1 1/4, 8.3 1/8
2020 RAM 1500 SLT 4x4 5.7 A8 Hemi
2007 Hummer H3 3.7 liter turd
2019 Chevy Spark petrol car 38 mpg
  #14  
Old 01-08-2010, 03:52 PM
6 Grrrs's Avatar
6 Grrrs 6 Grrrs is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greensburg, PA
Posts: 1,681
Default

1/2 ton 2wd 5.7L is very different from a 454 dually

My 100% completely stock 1990 454SS with T400 & 3.73s only got a best of 13mpg with my then girlfriend driving it. Usually I got 8-10 mpg on the highway & 8 around town.

Now it gets 17mpg on the highway & about 10mpg around town, with 398 whp.

__________________
Tod Hoffmann

1966 GTO Montero Red Hardtop - Holley EFI'd 462, KRE DPorts/Muncie 4spd
1990 Chevy 454SS pickup - Accel DFI/T56 6spd - Hot Rod Power Tour Long Hauler
1996 Chevy K2500 ECSB 'Poopy'
2002 Honda VTX1800C
2016 Cadillac CTS Premium

My project thread: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=516826

  #15  
Old 01-12-2010, 09:47 AM
BILTIT's Avatar
BILTIT BILTIT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sask, canada
Posts: 3,777
Default

http://howellefi.com/customer/produc...cat=272&page=1

This might even work better!

__________________
Derek B.
Current best: 11.97@110 1.65-60' !!!

'74 ventura, (Fired july 14/06) '74 462 4-bolt (9.5-1), SCAT, Ross, T-II w/850DP (shaker455), TH350, Conti 10'' 3800, Supercomps, Magnaflow, 3'' Pypes, 3.73's, 28x13.5-15 ET streets.

1970 Beismeyer 17' flatbottom vdrive, 11.8:1 455P, ported heads, dual Qjet tunnel ram.
  #16  
Old 01-12-2010, 01:36 PM
boater bill's Avatar
boater bill boater bill is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cape Coral Florida
Posts: 917
Default

I converted my Jeep 258 to a GM 4.3 TBI with an Offy intake several years ago. I got all of the wiring, sensors, TBI etc from http://www.turbocity.com/
I am sure they can help with your conversion. You will add an O2 sensor, lock out all of the vacuum and mechanical advance, different fuel pump, etc.

Good luck

  #17  
Old 01-12-2010, 02:36 PM
amcmike's Avatar
amcmike amcmike is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,733
Default

Been a while since I've perused this site, but somewhere there was information on burning your own chips. Of course, you still have to know how to tune it.

http://www.diy-efi.org/

__________________
"The Mustang's front end is problematic... get yourself a Firebird." - Red Forman
  #18  
Old 01-13-2010, 05:13 PM
Jack Blum's Avatar
Jack Blum Jack Blum is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Orange, CA USA
Posts: 583
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponjohn View Post
I proposed this on PZ using a marine MFI upper intake. You would then have to fab a lower intake to use the upper.

The issue with the EFI intakes sold today for the poncho is there is not enough plenum area. I consulted with two custom intake companies and they concurred that the plenum area is very important for an N/A application.

An example of a good efi intake with plenum area is Jack Blume's. Here is a picture.

Yea, Bill PMDRACER and I designed that and Bill built it back in 1995. We got to talk to a couple of guys that design EFI manifolds for a living. There best advice was 1 cubic inch for each cube in the motor in the plenum. And the runners as straight as possible with 1% per inch minimum taper. This helps keep the air from swirling and also speeds it up. The problem with using most carburetor manifolds is there is no plenum and usually no taper. But if your just doing a street car it usually works fine.

__________________


TigerEFI.com (Classic Pontiac Fuel Injection)
2004 GTO Company car, 1994 TA 25th Anv, 1971 Grand Safari Wagon, 1968 GTO EFI, 1968 GTO Stock, 1968 GTO Convertible in desperate need of restoration.



  #19  
Old 05-01-2017, 10:48 PM
jonathonar89 jonathonar89 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Island Lake, IL
Posts: 265
Default

Sorry to bring up an old thread but I thought it'd be better to revive it rather than start a new one. I haven't posted in a while and my project has been slow-moving/changing the past couple years but I've been making moves towards building this setup on my Pontiac 400. I hope to be more finalized with the build this upcoming year.

-454 TBI from late 80's truck
-Holley Street Dominator intake
-'81 Turbo 301 Distributor (computer controlled Pontiac HEI)
-Megasquirt 2 Carb-To-EFI kit




  #20  
Old 05-01-2017, 11:23 PM
trailwing's Avatar
trailwing trailwing is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sterling, VA
Posts: 411
Default

I think you will need some tuning help and perhaps a wideband or self learning computer. I screwed around with a 350 in my Jeep for months... Edelbrock intake, Holley intake, Holley throttle body, 350 throttle body, 455 GM throttle body... the stock computer is stupid and difficult to tune by yourself. Without a dyno, it's difficult to simulate all the load and rpm conditions required to make it run right.

__________________
1972 LeMans

"Individual results may vary..."
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017