Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-28-2006, 01:32 PM
Jeff Walker's Avatar
Jeff Walker Jeff Walker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 2,949
Arrow Excellent link about crankshaft thrust bearing failures

Just thought I would share this link about info on crankshaft thrust bearing failures. A bit of a long read, but IMO, some really good info. http://www.atra.com/crankshaft/

__________________
North Dakotas fastest REAL GTO
10.10 @ 131 MPH in the 1/4
Hoping to get it back together some year.

www.jandjrepairandrestoration
  #2  
Old 11-28-2006, 07:10 PM
R J Staub R J Staub is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: York PA
Posts: 202
Default

Thanks for the article. Very good read! Excellent info for those of us just starting out building their own motors... I;m filing it away for future use. & I think the mod that they talk about for the thrust bearings is similiar to the one that P-Dude recommends, although it is hard to see in their pics...
http://www.angelfire.com/fl4/pontiac...earingmod.html

__________________
Outlaw Pontiac Drag Series
Race Director
  #3  
Old 11-28-2006, 09:18 PM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,540
Default

I concur

  #4  
Old 11-29-2006, 12:31 AM
Will Will is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 5,297
Default

As one who has suffered repeat thrust bearing failures without an obvious cause, that was very interesting reading. Thanks much!

__________________
----------------------------
'72 Formula 400 Lucerne Blue, Blue Deluxe interior - My first car!
'73 Firebird 350/4-speed Black on Black, mix & match.
  #5  
Old 11-29-2006, 08:19 PM
Malky Malky is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,167
Default

I am in the middle of a mysterious thrust brg failure myself on a SBC, 50 miles after a rebuild. I found this article and a few others like it googling. I will do the brg mod and check for high TC pressure on the tranny cooler inlet line.

  #6  
Old 11-29-2006, 08:23 PM
Jeff Walker's Avatar
Jeff Walker Jeff Walker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 2,949
Default

If you do find high TC pressure you better take the pan of the trans and see if there is an abnormal amount of material in the pan. The article that I posted stated that if thrust bearing failure is transmission related it will usually damage the transmission too.

__________________
North Dakotas fastest REAL GTO
10.10 @ 131 MPH in the 1/4
Hoping to get it back together some year.

www.jandjrepairandrestoration
  #7  
Old 11-29-2006, 09:29 PM
GRX's Avatar
GRX GRX is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,400
Default

Great article!
My favorite part is where they mention surface finish. I have been in heated discussions about that more than once. Many believe the thrust should have the cross-hatch to move the oil much the same as on the cylinder walls. However I always polished the thrust smooth when I ground a crank. Never had an issue. Then again I was not building racing engines either. More for longevity than performance in most cases.

__________________
1969 GTO hard top ~ Std bore 400, '70-RA3 block, 670 heads, Bal. & Blue... M22, 12-bolt w/3:55s
  #8  
Old 11-29-2006, 09:59 PM
RAIV55 RAIV55 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SD
Posts: 2,127
Default

I had a couple issues concerning that article. First the asumption that something is jammed when the statement was made about transmission damage. True if the pump/converter doesn't have enough endplay either by reversing the inner pump gear or freeplay between the converter to flexplate... it will eat the pump. The second thing is minor, but the area calculation was in error, should be going off the OD of the converter hub.

Rest of the article was pretty much in line with what was posted on an AERA bulletin I read.

  #9  
Old 11-29-2006, 10:50 PM
Pontirag Pontirag is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bisbee, AZ USA
Posts: 3,872
Default

I've always gave the crank a bit of a smack forward with a dead blow hammer to seat both halves of the thrust bearing as far forward as is reasonable, specificly to seat both of them and to ensure that they both rest firmly against the face of the thrust surface and both of those bearing halves are seated firmly against thier respective surfaces on the main cap and engine bearing "saddle". if not two possible outcomes:
1. If one bearing half is seated and the other is not then at some point early in the start up of a fresh rebuild the crank will force the improperly seated thrust bearing half forward. not good for a properly torqued maincap as the bearing must be able to slide forward. something it cant possibly do when the main cap is properly torqued but something it will do catostrophically.
2. ditto if both bearing halves are not seated properly as far forward as is possible. the crank as it breakes in upon start up will force both halves forward under about the most imposible curcumstances possible and the bearing itself and its fragile surface is the weak link and it will fail.

Another precaution should also be noted. If you put a high pressure/ heavy duty pressure plate on a car that has some miles on it that increased pressure will transmit that pressure forward to the thrust surface of that bearing and even a low milage engine will sustain increased wear. a high milage engine will most likely fail in short order, especially if you have numericaly high number rear gears or bigger tires.

I've also noticed an increased likelyhood that the rear main seal will also fail (begin to leak) if you've converted a medium to high milage auto trans engine to a manual trans. The forward movement experienced as the clutch is operated moves the crank back and forth starts to work over a broken in and perhaps tired seal.

  #10  
Old 11-30-2006, 07:16 AM
Geoff Geoff is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,477
Default

Great article. I didn't see any mention of the flex plate function.

I have always wondered about the 'stiffness' or 'spring' in the flex plate & what it's roll is, if any, in absorbing some of the force the converter trying to push forward. If the flexplate was 1/4" thick, it is very rigid, no longer really a 'flex' plate, more a rigid plate; any force the converter generates will be transmitted forwards in it's entirety by a 1/4" plate. A thinner 1/8" flex plate I would think will bend with the quoted 210 lbs of force applied to it, acting like a spring being compressed, absorbing some of the force.
Are some of the extra thick performance flex plates contributing to the thrust failures?

  #11  
Old 11-30-2006, 10:26 AM
P@blo's Avatar
P@blo P@blo is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,529
Default

OK, what the heck do they put in the water down there and can you send me some.

Geoff, your posts are always full of great information and were lucky to have you posting on the PY forum.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017