| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
10-25-2003, 08:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Do these intakes all flow about the same out of the box! - Mild Clean up! - Ported!
 
|
|
#2
10-25-2003, 08:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do these intakes all flow about the same out of the box! - Mild Clean up! - Ported!
|
|
#3
10-25-2003, 08:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can't tell you how much they flow but the following will be of interest.....
A Pontiac cylinder head was flow bench tested and it produced 282 cfm. Then various intakes were bolted on to this same cylinder head and re-tested to see how much the flow dropped off. Here are the results for the Torker II & RPM: Performer RPM- 273 cfm Torker II- 264 Unfortunatly no numbers for the HSD intake. As mentioned in another post we will be dyno testing the Torker II, modified HSD, Performer RPM and possibly a Victor if time permits. I hope to be posting the results soon.
__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 ) Old information here: http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/ Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine) 5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE |
|
#4
10-25-2003, 08:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steve! Thats pretty interest'n - We went from a torker to the Holly SD and gained .10 et and 1 mph then went to a Victor and gained another .10 and 1 mph all with the same 850 holly and a 1" spacer on all the intakes......I sure hope you get to do the test, I think all of us out here will be surprised at the results.
|
|
#5
10-25-2003, 09:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by JOE ALLAN:
Steve! Thats pretty interest'n - We went from a torker to the Holly SD and gained .10 et and 1 mph then went to a Victor and gained another .10 and 1 mph all with the same 850 holly and a 1" spacer on all the intakes......I sure hope you get to do the test, I think all of us out here will be surprised at the results. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Joe - was this on a full-on race engine or a more mild build up? Seems like a vic would be a lot of intake for a garden-variety bracket engine. I'm trying to decide what to do with my torker 1. |
|
#6
10-25-2003, 10:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mikeb: Mild D-Port 455 - Hyd Cam - leave'n at 2500 rpm - footbrake'n - ran a best at Dallas in 108 degree weather of 11.36 at 117 mph.....Don't know head flow but they were no where near what i've seen pictured on here.....maybe 250 cfm at most....What was interest'n was we didn't loose anything with the big intake.......Joe
|
|
#7
10-27-2003, 07:49 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I swapped my victor for Torker2 over the weekend, mainly for more useful low-end performance. Hopefully it is a step in the right direction for the street.
Have yet to drive the car since the weather was crappy over the weekend. 1973 SD455 T/A 1979 S.E. T/A http://community.webshots.com/album/16587603rOyvmFCiHs
__________________
Home of WFO Hyperformance Shaker induction. |
|
#8
10-29-2003, 10:23 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Larry let me know what you think of the swap.
__________________
Skip Fix 1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever! 1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand 1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project 2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4 1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project 1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs |
| Reply |
|
|
The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.
Linear Mode
