Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2016, 11:51 PM
STEELCITYFIREBIRD's Avatar
STEELCITYFIREBIRD STEELCITYFIREBIRD is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: "STEELER COUNTRY"
Posts: 2,950
Default Rate the PONTIAC INTAKES?!?

How do they all compare (low height models for 2nd gen Fbody hood clearence) in as cast form and/or with simple port match on a 400 engine?

>Stock 1970 typical 4 BBl cast iron
>Torker I
>TorkerII
>Hurricane
>Holley Streetmaster
>Performer
>455 HO repro
>76+ EGR 4 bbl
>anything I left out

Thanks!

  #2  
Old 12-07-2016, 01:21 AM
Will Will is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 5,297
Default

Depends on the combo and what you want out of it. 068-ish cam, stock converter, taller rear gears, a stock intake is going to work best.

Bigger cam, converter, gears, one of the single plane choices would probably be best, probably TII or the Street Dominator/Hurricane (they're the same thing). I'm assuming you meant Street Dominator when you typed "Streetmaster" as I've never heard of that intake.

An early cast iron intake and the 455HO repro will perform about the same. Even the '73+ EGR intakes work pretty darned well.

There's just no one way to rank these intakes as how well they work really depends on other factors.

__________________
----------------------------
'72 Formula 400 Lucerne Blue, Blue Deluxe interior - My first car!
'73 Firebird 350/4-speed Black on Black, mix & match.
  #3  
Old 12-07-2016, 01:26 AM
77 TRASHCAN's Avatar
77 TRASHCAN 77 TRASHCAN is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 31May2013 Temporary home to the world's widest (that we know of) tornado. Lord, NO more Please...
Posts: 6,598
Default

Edelbrock made a Streetmaster intake for SBC's back in the 70's. A single plane with very small runners. Have seen a few at swap meets recently, I wonder how they performed....
Never seen or heard of one for a Pontiac.

Yeah,that list has some apples, oranges and peaches on it, no way to compare them all on one specific type of engine. Jim Hand tested many of them on his wagon, though!

__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A.
I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977.

Shut it off
Shut it off
Buddy, I just shut your Prius down...
  #4  
Old 12-07-2016, 06:53 AM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,432
Default

The Hurricane/Tomahawk intake is about the same height as a old Holley Street Dominator intake. And about the same height as a factory iron intake.

.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE
  #5  
Old 12-07-2016, 08:45 AM
DOC DOC is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: St. Johns FL
Posts: 1,072
Default

Had a T-1 on my 78 T/A. The hood scoop fit but sat kind of low and closer to the windshield. Plus it was a pig on my 462. Changed to a stock early 70's intake that was ported by Dave at SD performance. Totally different engine and scoop fits the way it should. If I was racing "maybe" the T-1 would be a better option but it was hands down the wrong intake for my car, the engine and my driving style on the street.

  #6  
Old 12-07-2016, 10:45 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,779
Default

T1s sucked on anything less than 440 to 455 CID with at least 3.23 gears and 3400 lbs or less!

  #7  
Old 12-07-2016, 11:29 AM
STEELCITYFIREBIRD's Avatar
STEELCITYFIREBIRD STEELCITYFIREBIRD is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: "STEELER COUNTRY"
Posts: 2,950
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by STEELCITYFIREBIRD View Post
How do they all compare (low height models for 2nd gen Fbody hood clearence) in as cast form and/or with simple port match on a 400 engine?

>Stock 1970 typical 4 BBl cast iron

>TorkerII
>Hurricane/Holley Street Dominator
>Performer
>455 HO repro
>76+ EGR 4 bbl
>anything I left out

Thanks!
Fixed the list.
More likely engine details.
400

Likely Combo:
2nd Gen Formula @ 3900#,very limited use hot street car.
~220-230cfm #48 heads,11.3:1
60919 cam Rhoads VMAX Lifters,
RARE 2.25" manifolds
BM ST10- 2.43 1st gear,4.10 rear

FUEL INDUCTION
>either 76 QJET,
>one of the new EFI systems(meanstreet FITECH) ,
>Spread or Square DP Holley
Likely on E85, or 93 pump fuel, or 93 blended with 110 TBD.

Removed T1 as an option.

  #8  
Old 12-07-2016, 11:34 AM
STEELCITYFIREBIRD's Avatar
STEELCITYFIREBIRD STEELCITYFIREBIRD is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: "STEELER COUNTRY"
Posts: 2,950
Default

So I have a factory 70 factory cast, factory 76 EGR, Performer RPM (not an option too tall),and can have a T2, old Street Dominator or new Hurricane I can buy relatively cheap.

What makes one more suited to certain applications than others?
Not looking to do the SD port, just a gasket match myself.

  #9  
Old 12-07-2016, 11:35 AM
PunchT37's Avatar
PunchT37 PunchT37 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lafayette,LA
Posts: 3,255
Default

Up to around 500hp or so, I would run a ported factory intake with a properly tuned q-jet.

Gotta keep the shaker shakin.

Guess you got a shaker? No?


Last edited by PunchT37; 12-07-2016 at 11:43 AM.
  #10  
Old 12-07-2016, 11:38 AM
PunchT37's Avatar
PunchT37 PunchT37 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lafayette,LA
Posts: 3,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by STEELCITYFIREBIRD View Post
So I have a factory 70 factory cast, factory 76 EGR, Performer RPM (not an option too tall),and can have a T2, old Street Dominator or new Hurricane I can buy relatively cheap.

What makes one more suited to certain applications than others?
Not looking to do the SD port, just a gasket match myself.
On the `70 vs `76, factory, I would run the one that matches the choke setup of the q-jet.

  #11  
Old 12-07-2016, 11:50 AM
PunchT37's Avatar
PunchT37 PunchT37 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lafayette,LA
Posts: 3,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by STEELCITYFIREBIRD View Post
Fixed the list.
More likely engine details.
400

Likely Combo:
2nd Gen Formula @ 3900#,very limited use hot street car.
~220-230cfm #48 heads,11.3:1
60919 cam Rhoads VMAX Lifters,
RARE 2.25" manifolds
BM ST10- 2.43 1st gear,4.10 rear

FUEL INDUCTION
>either 76 QJET,
>one of the new EFI systems(meanstreet FITECH) ,
>Spread or Square DP Holley
Likely on E85, or 93 pump fuel, or 93 blended with 110 TBD.

Removed T1 as an option.
What pistons are you running? 11.3 compress on a flattop 400 seems kinda high. Even with 48 heads.

  #12  
Old 12-07-2016, 12:09 PM
STEELCITYFIREBIRD's Avatar
STEELCITYFIREBIRD STEELCITYFIREBIRD is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: "STEELER COUNTRY"
Posts: 2,950
Default

No shaker, one year '76 Formula hood.
Ported stock not in budget/timeline...for now.
L2262F30, zero deck, 64 or 66cc chambers,I don't recall off hand what I got when I cc'ed them, ~.040 gasket.
Electric choke conversion on any of the carbs used.

  #13  
Old 12-07-2016, 12:26 PM
Blued and Painted's Avatar
Blued and Painted Blued and Painted is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Granby Colorado
Posts: 2,431
Default


STEEKCITYFIREBIRD
Likely Combo:
2nd Gen Formula @ 3900#,very limited use hot street car.
~220-230cfm #48 heads,11.3:1
60919 cam Rhoads VMAX Lifters,
RARE 2.25" manifolds
BM ST10- 2.43 1st gear,4.10 rear

This does not read like a street car.
With a 4.10gear, you will spent allot of time getting out of your own way.
While your going thru first and second gear, a modern mustang will be long gone. JMO.

__________________
Bull Nose Formula-461, 6x-4, Q-jet, HEI, TH400, 8.5 3.08, superslowjunk

Last edited by Blued and Painted; 12-07-2016 at 12:31 PM.
  #14  
Old 12-07-2016, 12:50 PM
STEELCITYFIREBIRD's Avatar
STEELCITYFIREBIRD STEELCITYFIREBIRD is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: "STEELER COUNTRY"
Posts: 2,950
Default

I know it is a row boat with the ST10's 1st gear, I'm up to the task for now, a close ratio M20 may replace the ST10 when it is ready or possibly an OD unit. It will go 8 miles from home, max, and on windy back roads at that. The 4.10's are here to stay.... I like deep gears.
My other car has a 428 2-4's and 4.56's in it.

  #15  
Old 12-07-2016, 01:18 PM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,432
Default

Keep in mind if one was to compare a optimized factory intake as Dave Bisschop does vs a Tomahawk out of the box. The Tomahawk particularly the front runners are all different sizes and need a fair amount of grinding using some snap gauges to get them close to even in size. Also the Tomahawk port openings as cast are small. How much work will depend on the performance level and the cylinder head port size in use. And if hood clearance will allow the addition of carb spacers help performance.


.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE
  #16  
Old 12-07-2016, 01:50 PM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 14,767
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve C. View Post
... How much work will depend on the performance level and the cylinder head port size in use. ...

.
Yeah, many of those intakes don't have enough meat to properly seal on aftermarket 310+ cfm heads, and need a bead welded to the tops of the runners. It's work. So the application is a consideration.

.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
  #17  
Old 12-07-2016, 02:10 PM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,432
Default

At a approximate 2.300" port height the Tomahawk has about 0.125" at the top to seal. Similar with a HSD intake.

.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE
  #18  
Old 12-07-2016, 02:14 PM
STEELCITYFIREBIRD's Avatar
STEELCITYFIREBIRD STEELCITYFIREBIRD is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: "STEELER COUNTRY"
Posts: 2,950
Default

The heads are port matched to a std Fel Pro blue gasket, and nothing more is planned.
Another intake I forgot that I can get is a P4B Edelbrock.

So with a spread bore which intake?
With a square bore Holley?
With FITECH Meanstreet?

And which carb is better choice for what I have below and behind.

The only work I want to do to the intake is port match to std port gasket.
Thanks for all input!

...the streets are tough and short where I live!

I don't plan to be the king of the hill, just a good quick car.

  #19  
Old 12-07-2016, 09:22 PM
PunchT37's Avatar
PunchT37 PunchT37 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lafayette,LA
Posts: 3,255
Default

I would go factory for the spread bore and T2 for square bore or FI.

What rods do you run? Rpm`s are gonna matter with the T2. I`d like to see 6200 to 6500 rpm capability with the 400 and single plane manifold.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017