FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
|
||||
|
||||
I think the weight alone on the aluminum heads you will be pleased, not to mention flow.
__________________
Skip Fix 1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever! 1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand 1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project 2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4 1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project 1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Less weight on the nose will certainly help handling dynamics though, so worth it over all.
__________________
-Jason 1969 Pontiac Firebird |
#83
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
DragStarLeMans |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks! It's been a labor but she's coming together nicely.
__________________
-Jason 1969 Pontiac Firebird |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Depending on your front spring rate I don't think it will move up much. If you have 525 lb springs it takes 525 lbs to compress the spring 1". The heads will shave 50 lbs off. So maybe .10"?
__________________
-1967 GTO HO Restomod. PKMM 433ci, SilverSport T56 Magnum 6spd, Moser 9", SC&C and a bunch of other pro touring goodies - Build Thread http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...615847&page=23 |
#86
|
||||
|
||||
I run GW springs on my LeMans, when I went to aluminum heads the ride height didn't change. If that helps at all.
.
__________________
. 1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2 http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624 1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be |
#87
|
||||
|
||||
Much easier on the back putting them on the motor though!
And it is a nice look!
__________________
Skip Fix 1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever! 1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand 1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project 2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4 1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project 1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Yeah, I'm kind of dreading pulling the stock pieces off the engine.
__________________
-Jason 1969 Pontiac Firebird |
#89
|
||||
|
||||
I have some ported 6Xs I was going to use on the new 455 for the 81 TA. Decent flow I got them with the 455. After straining to toss them on the flow bench, then tossing some stone stock E heads on it my back was much happier and the untouched E heads flowed better to boot!
__________________
Skip Fix 1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever! 1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand 1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project 2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4 1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project 1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs |
#90
|
||||
|
||||
Agreed. I was concerned that the aluminim heads, intake, and water pump would affect ride height- they didn't.
|
#91
|
|||
|
|||
I dont know about alu but when I changed out my short deck engine for a std deck engine it made a HUGE diff in the handling in my 69 bird.Tom
|
#92
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
What made the diff in handling, weight? .
__________________
. 1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2 http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624 1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
The short deck was a RA V 303 based engine.The 301 is also a short deck,was lighter.Was amazed how much oversteer the std deck engine put in the car.Tom
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
My car pushes tremendously with it's current setup. With the trutrac differential, you can effectively throttle steer it though. The staggered wheel fitment is hindering that, so I could use some extra rear wheel rate. I'll address that with adjustable bars later on. Getting the car reliable is first before that however.
__________________
-Jason 1969 Pontiac Firebird |
#95
|
||||
|
||||
May just need higher rate front springs.
Oversteer is normally due to too small a front bar, or too large a rear. I see so many use an 1 1/16 front bar and a 1 rear bar, and usually, that's not an optimum combo. Think it's because some add a rear bar later, choose a 1", and keep the original front bar. Pushing is understeer, and most typical drivers prefer that. Most. Some of the common causes I see are too narrow/too tall a front tire, raised front end, low tire psi in the front, and sometimes too much toe in on the alignment. I kind of figured the 'short deck' comment was in reference to the 303, but didn't want to sound stupid if I was wrong! Heh-heh! What's the difference in weight? .
__________________
. 1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2 http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624 1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
I never weighed either.Had a front end guy work on it and he got it much better.Has the 69 TA front sway bar,don't remember what size rear.Tom
|
Reply |
|
|