Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old 08-04-2023, 11:39 PM
Gach's Avatar
Gach Gach is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: R. I.
Posts: 4,595
Default

Ok just saw you said bearings looked good. I’m guessing crank is bent. Wish I could be there to check it all out for you.

  #142  
Old 08-04-2023, 11:40 PM
jhein's Avatar
jhein jhein is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Oregon
Posts: 998
Default

I don't know squat, but I've followed this thread with great interest. The way you went about your repair was quite meticulous so that makes me think something else is wrong that's not related to workmanship or small parts. As mentioned maybe something with the crank?

Whatever it is, I hope (I know) you'll get it figured out because with all the blood, sweat and tears you've put into that thing you deserve it.

__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Ray Klemm calibrated Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear

https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share
The Following User Says Thank You to jhein For This Useful Post:
  #143  
Old 08-04-2023, 11:45 PM
Verdoro 68's Avatar
Verdoro 68 Verdoro 68 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Clayton, CA
Posts: 2,831
Default

By using a SpeedPro bearing on #5 I was able to get the clearance to .0025. I used King bearings on 1-4 with .0024-.0025 clearance. Two things I didn’t check - the line bore and the crank straightness.

The crank is a cast Eagle unit from Butler. I’m not sure if they check them for straightness before they ship them out. I would imagine they do, but things happen.

I’m thinking I’ll pull it l, get it torn down again and have our local Pontiac builder take a look at the block and the crank.

__________________
Ken
'68 GTO - Ram Air II 464 - 236/242 roller - 9.5” TSP converter - Moser 3.55 Truetrac (build thread | walk around)
'95 Comp T/A #6 M6 - bone stock (pics)
  #144  
Old 08-04-2023, 11:51 PM
Gach's Avatar
Gach Gach is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: R. I.
Posts: 4,595
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdoro 68 View Post
By using a SpeedPro bearing on #5 I was able to get the clearance to .0025. I used King bearings on 1-4 with .0024-.0025 clearance. Two things I didn’t check - the line bore and the crank straightness.

The crank is a cast Eagle unit from Butler. I’m not sure if they check them for straightness before they ship them out. I would imagine they do, but things happen.

I’m thinking I’ll pull it l, get it torn down again and have our local Pontiac builder take a look at the block and the crank.
Thats only way to go..smart move. Although Butler is good..I hate to say this but you can’t trust any you get. I’ve also learn not to trust anything done by machine shops or I should don’t take it for granted. I know it sucks !

  #145  
Old 08-05-2023, 12:04 AM
Gach's Avatar
Gach Gach is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: R. I.
Posts: 4,595
Default

I’m dealing with a bent crank right now for a friend. Yeah he’s going to make good, but what a hassle sending it back.

  #146  
Old 08-05-2023, 12:17 AM
Verdoro 68's Avatar
Verdoro 68 Verdoro 68 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Clayton, CA
Posts: 2,831
Default

Just the name of the game. Stuff happens. You fix it, learn some stuff in the process, move on and hope it helps someone else in the future.

The fact that this happened twice - and not immediately after start up - makes me think it’s a deeper problem than incorrect installation.


Last edited by Verdoro 68; 08-05-2023 at 12:27 AM.
  #147  
Old 08-05-2023, 12:33 AM
Dragncar Dragncar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Humbolt County California
Posts: 8,346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdoro 68 View Post
By using a SpeedPro bearing on #5 I was able to get the clearance to .0025. I used King bearings on 1-4 with .0024-.0025 clearance. Two things I didn’t check - the line bore and the crank straightness.

The crank is a cast Eagle unit from Butler. I’m not sure if they check them for straightness before they ship them out. I would imagine they do, but things happen.

I’m thinking I’ll pull it l, get it torn down again and have our local Pontiac builder take a look at the block and the crank.
I had a Eagle cast crank once. Sent it to Dan Whitmore and he checked it from one end to the other.
It was bent .004 and has .001 tapper on journals along with a very rough thrust surface. Had to have it straightened, cut .010-,010 and polished.
Bet its the crank,

  #148  
Old 08-05-2023, 12:58 AM
Gach's Avatar
Gach Gach is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: R. I.
Posts: 4,595
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdoro 68 View Post
Just the name of the game. Stuff happens. You fix it, learn some stuff in the process, move on and hope it helps someone else in the future.

The fact that this happened twice - and not immediately after start up - makes me think it’s a deeper problem than incorrect installation.
Yep !

  #149  
Old 08-05-2023, 02:49 AM
lust4speed's Avatar
lust4speed lust4speed is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Yucaipa, SoCal
Posts: 8,703
Default

Refer back to my #90 post. Having been there, done that, and got the melted strands, I can tell you that whether you thought you didn't pack it too tight or not -- you packed the seal in the groove too tight. To prevent this you need to lay the seal in the grove and roll it out to the ends with absolutely no compacting of the seal. After this first failure I started to just set them in place, and the oldest one is about six years old now. Here's a photo of my melted shards. I probably have about eight engines with the graphite/Teflon rear main seal out on the road and they are doing fine.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Graphite shards.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	82.5 KB
ID:	617447  

__________________
Mick Batson
1967 original owner Tyro Blue/black top 4-speed HO GTO with all the original parts stored safely away -- 1965 2+2 survivor AC auto -- 1965 Catalina Safari Wagon in progress.
  #150  
Old 08-05-2023, 07:52 AM
Verdoro 68's Avatar
Verdoro 68 Verdoro 68 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Clayton, CA
Posts: 2,831
Default

Maybe so. I did pack this one tighter than the first one I did. How long did that seal last?

__________________
Ken
'68 GTO - Ram Air II 464 - 236/242 roller - 9.5” TSP converter - Moser 3.55 Truetrac (build thread | walk around)
'95 Comp T/A #6 M6 - bone stock (pics)
  #151  
Old 08-05-2023, 11:22 AM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 14,768
Default

Just to say out loud, should wipe the surface with assembly lube, and not go dry.

I honestly have never seen a rear main seal do that. Was the drag on the crank excessive? After you dropped the crank in etc, did you check how much drag there was?


.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
  #152  
Old 08-05-2023, 12:19 PM
Tandyman Tandyman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Northern GTA, Canada
Posts: 69
Default

Mick ,
Did you use RTV on the back of the seal or pin them or did you just drop them in place right out of the package ?
Thanks,
Glenn

  #153  
Old 08-05-2023, 12:59 PM
Gach's Avatar
Gach Gach is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: R. I.
Posts: 4,595
Default

I could be wrong, but either way the Crank has to come back out. To all of a sudden to end up with .010 clearance when first installed was 2.5 thousand tells me something else is going on. I don’t think it was packed to tight. So either crank is bent or line bore isn’t correct. Getting crank checked will answer allot of questions. Or main question.

Anyway thoughts on why all of a sudden he’d end up with .010 clearance ?

  #154  
Old 08-05-2023, 01:14 PM
Verdoro 68's Avatar
Verdoro 68 Verdoro 68 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Clayton, CA
Posts: 2,831
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gach View Post
I could be wrong, but either way the Crank has to come back out. To all of a sudden to end up with .010 clearance when first installed was 2.5 thousand tells me something else is going on. I don’t think it was packed to tight. So either crank is bent or line bore isn’t correct. Getting crank checked will answer allot of questions. Or main question.

Anyway thoughts on why all of a sudden he’d end up with .010 clearance ?
I think some signals got crossed here. Nothing is .010 clearance.

When I assembled the engine the #5 crank journal clearance measured .0035 while #1-#4 bearing clearances were .0024-.0025. I used a different bearing shell to get #5 to .0025. As far as I know, none of the clearances have changed.

I was pointing this out because it could indicate a problem with the line bore that I band aided with a different bearing.



Quote:
Originally Posted by HWYSTR455 View Post
Just to say out loud, should wipe the surface with assembly lube, and not go dry.
I honestly have never seen a rear main seal do that. Was the drag on the crank excessive? After you dropped the crank in etc, did you check how much drag there was?
.
I used red assembly lube on the seal when I installed it, as the instructions say. Nothing seemed out of the ordinary with crank drag.

I may send a few pics to Best Gasket and see if they have anything to say. I'm sure they've seen it before. I'll still get the crank checked just in case.

__________________
Ken
'68 GTO - Ram Air II 464 - 236/242 roller - 9.5” TSP converter - Moser 3.55 Truetrac (build thread | walk around)
'95 Comp T/A #6 M6 - bone stock (pics)
  #155  
Old 08-05-2023, 01:30 PM
Gach's Avatar
Gach Gach is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: R. I.
Posts: 4,595
Default

Ok, must of got that confused thanks

  #156  
Old 08-05-2023, 01:34 PM
Gach's Avatar
Gach Gach is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: R. I.
Posts: 4,595
Default

Be interesting to see what Best Gasket says, or their thoughts.

  #157  
Old 08-05-2023, 01:42 PM
grandam1979 grandam1979 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio, Findlay
Posts: 1,437
Default

I hate to say it but I’m going with packed to tight also I just didn’t want be mister negative when you were spending a lot of time getting it where you wanted it. Will be interesting to see what actually happen when you get it apart.

  #158  
Old 08-05-2023, 01:57 PM
400 Lemans's Avatar
400 Lemans 400 Lemans is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 552
Default

https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...torquing+mains You may have already seen this older thread.

  #159  
Old 08-05-2023, 03:07 PM
Verdoro 68's Avatar
Verdoro 68 Verdoro 68 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Clayton, CA
Posts: 2,831
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grandam1979 View Post
I hate to say it but I’m going with packed to tight also I just didn’t want be mister negative when you were spending a lot of time getting it where you wanted it. Will be interesting to see what actually happen when you get it apart.
When you are saying "packed too tight" are you speaking about how I pressed it in place in the cap, the pressure on the seal once the cap was torqued down or both?

I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around how packing the seal into place in the cap and block would cause more pre-load, but I can see how the cap torque (140 ft/lbs w/ studs) could bungle things. The only thing I can think of is maybe I didn't cut the seal down far enough with the spacer and/or press the ends down flush enough. Maybe when the cap was torqued it put a little too much load on the seal which caused it to eventually eat itself. Still odd that it failed after a few hundred miles and not immediately. The dissection will tell the tale.

__________________
Ken
'68 GTO - Ram Air II 464 - 236/242 roller - 9.5” TSP converter - Moser 3.55 Truetrac (build thread | walk around)
'95 Comp T/A #6 M6 - bone stock (pics)
  #160  
Old 08-05-2023, 03:31 PM
b-man's Avatar
b-man b-man is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 16,486
Default

Have you considered going to the one piece BOP seal?

Here’s how Mick (lust4speed) did the seal and crankshaft install on my 421 HO.

After checking the main seal fit in the block with the rear main cap tightened it was determined that it fit the machined receiver groove in the block perfectly with just the right amount of compression.

Main bearings in place ready for the crankshaft install. All main bearing clearances were checked with the proper measuring tools. After shuffling around some of the bearing halves all the clearances ended up between .0023" and .0024" so we're looking good there.

No helpers were present to help install the heavy 80+ pound crankshaft and BOP one-piece main seal at the same time, so an engine hoist was employed to help accomplish this important and somewhat delicate task.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	098F7798-7AA7-48F3-A68B-A826BDA492E7.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	46.8 KB
ID:	617475   Click image for larger version

Name:	74A1A75B-9B5C-443B-96C4-EF8019F53CD3.jpg
Views:	76
Size:	47.9 KB
ID:	617476   Click image for larger version

Name:	E221CEB5-F5E3-4068-A7D2-22A228C75523.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	40.8 KB
ID:	617477   Click image for larger version

Name:	15317494-594A-4754-9FC9-7DB09AFF88CE.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	75.8 KB
ID:	617478   Click image for larger version

Name:	12E1ADA6-828E-44C1-A759-1795A8DCC3CD.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	55.7 KB
ID:	617479  


__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42
1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56
2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017