FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I find that power level a very streetable drive anywhere type of car that runs on 91 cat pee with no fuss. Race and have fun and don't even open the hood. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Formulajones For This Useful Post: | ||
#82
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I heard there is someone who has never posted any dyno sheets that even a 5th grade could see is fake having problems with what is posted here. Guess that is what happens after looking at his fake dyno sheets for so long and starting to believe they are real. Stan
__________________
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises Offering Performance Software Since 1987 http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization - Cam Selection Software http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV Download FREE 14 Trial IOP / Flow Software http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV/Flow_..._Day_Trial.php Pontiac Pump Gas List http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_gas.htm Using PMD Block and Heads List http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_pmd.htm |
#83
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Hi Stan, A liars worst enemy is the truth. They just keep lying until they convince themselves myth is reality. I'm not sure what it's called when all of one's different personalities ramble on for an evening entertaining themselves but it sure is a good argument for better mental health programs. |
#84
|
||||
|
||||
I thought I'd bump this back up. I strongly believe we can make around 700 HP on pump gas using a 460'ish CID factory block, have good street manners.... and not have the thread locked!
|
#85
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Myself and 2 other fellow Pontiac enthusiasts were at the last IHRA drag race held in Tulsa, google says possibly 2009. We spend a lot of time in the pits. A guy walks past us, one of my buddies noticed something on his shirt, Kaase Racing? Asked him if he was Jon Kaase, he said, yes, I am!!! He let us ask him questions until we were out of breath and questions. Really a good guy. Nothing was top secret. THe only question I wondered about, I asked him about the EMC 508 engine (he advertised it here, using Jon Kaase as his user name). He said he thought....it went to the Pacific Northwest and he had not heard from or about it since selling it.......
__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A. I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977. Shut it off Shut it off Buddy, I just shut your Prius down... |
#86
|
||||
|
||||
I'd love to give it a go with a cam that's in the low 240 duration (imo much more than that and it gets a little rowdy for wives it seems), matched with a really good topend I think it could be close. Of course it'd need a great short block also.
|
#87
|
||||
|
||||
There is more power in a short block than most realize.
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
I think a 460ish could handle the 400 lobe lift 245-252 on a 114 and drive OK and handle PBs,not sure about AC.Tom
|
#89
|
||||
|
||||
You think it would make a difference if one used a modern A/C compressor?
|
#90
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It's probably doable with a Pontiac and I'd love to see a build like that. I'd like to see a really good set of heads so the camshaft doesn't have to be so wild to get there. |
#91
|
||||
|
||||
I don't see why you couldn't have A/C. The biggest obstacle with that is just being able to keep the combo cool, if you can do that you have it made
I've had AC on many 500hp and 600hp builds. I'd do it with a 700 build if I ever get around to the one sitting in the corner. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Paul,I don’t go near AC cars other than our modern cars,never owed a AC Classic car.My 63 Tempest does not even have PS-PB.Tom
|
The Following User Says Thank You to tom s For This Useful Post: | ||
#93
|
||||
|
||||
Definitely agree, attention to details in the short block is very important. Match that with a really good topend and great things can happen
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Remember this great build ? 700+ HP pump gas 434 that the kid drove to High School.
Not sure how rowdy the cam was. They were keeping the specs close to their vest since it was a Scott Brown cam. I think they sold it ans the basic specs were made public. A 4.25 crank would tame to down a bit and still make 700 hp. https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...d.php?t=775092 |
#95
|
||||
|
||||
I think a good bottom end and a really good set of flowing heads
so as not to have to run a super huge camshaft. I'm hoping to build a 489 ci factory block soon and hoping for 700 + HP. GT |
#96
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#97
|
||||
|
||||
I`ve got a 463 running road paver on 112 with 330 round port e heads. Got A/C with Sanden compressor. Not bad at all. Got an idle kick up solenoid. A little crappy when cold. Not bad at all once some heat in the motor.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to PunchT37 For This Useful Post: | ||
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Doable
I think the goal is achievable., and as many have said it is very subjective as to the "streetability" for the combo.
As a frame of reference, I have a C6Z06 that makes over 650 at the tires on a tough dyno. This car is a HCI car with elevated compression on E-85. This same dyno has tested an RPM Motorsports Stage 3 (91 octane) setup with some of my work on it that made barely over 600 WHP. So I imagine the 91 octane engine at 427 CI makes close to the 690 being discussed here. As tested on an engine dyno. This engine as well as mine have what I think are acceptable street manners. They drive well with manual transmissions, and IMO would be sweethearts in front of an auto with a good converter. My Z06 idles happily at 850 RPM, as does the RPM setup. Now before you say apples to oranges, I think a proper 455 based shortblock with a very good set of heads and carefully selected cam would get you to the goal. An engine in this ballpark displacement would have at least a 30 cubic inch displacement advantage over the LS7 combo. Might even get there with a hydraulic roller. I have an idea what the cam specs would be, but would be based on the head which would have the proper flow and CSA. Intake flow numbers for what they are worth would need to be in the 360-380 range. I also see 11-11.5:1 CR as required. Would require a 1 7/8" minimum header, and a good exhaust system (3" dual with smooth bends) People get hung up on worries about the cam being an issue, with respect to it being "too big". Too big is subjective, as long as it would tolerate being loaded down when the AC compressor kicks in. And if you have the right converter in it I don't see an issue. A good modern engine management system would certainly assist, but not a deal breaker for the person with mechanical tuning skills. I will tell you that you aren't making that power with more than 12" vacuum at 1000 RPM at 455-ish inches. But setup right it would not matter. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
|
#100
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
This would be enough to run a stock vacuum booster (single 11") set up properly. |
Reply |
|
|