Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-01-2002, 09:28 PM
luca_brozzi luca_brozzi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 4
Default

How much CR is safe to run with pump gas? Can you put toulene in to boost octane, and if so how
much.

  #2  
Old 01-01-2002, 09:28 PM
luca_brozzi luca_brozzi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 4
Default

How much CR is safe to run with pump gas? Can you put toulene in to boost octane, and if so how
much.

  #3  
Old 01-01-2002, 09:48 PM
Goatman Goatman is offline
On Vacation
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Dighton, MA
Posts: 3,665
Default

Great Name! Sleeping with the fishes!

About 9.5:1 with cast iron heads is safe as long as your octane is what it says it is.

Most octane boosters are junk. Tolulene is a dangerous substance and I'm pretty sure its illegal to add to your gas.

  #4  
Old 01-01-2002, 10:53 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

I agree with Goatman, on the additives. Most of the stuff out there will kill you if you make any kind of a mistake adding it to your tank. There was a time when Gale Banks was very big on the stuff in the early 80s with turbo stuff. I talked
to him at Bonneville this year and he was using
other stuff now. Alcohol!! Rather than mess with
the octane.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #5  
Old 01-02-2002, 03:08 PM
Phil69GTO Phil69GTO is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Lenexa, KS
Posts: 32
Default

Although tuning can make a big difference, I think anything much above 9.5 or so with iron heads is getting into dangerous territory. Gasoline quality isn't getting any better these days. Over-the-counter additives are worthless in my opinion. The small incremental horsepower increase from moving to 9.5 to 10.0 for example just doesn't make sense for a street application.

  #6  
Old 01-02-2002, 04:16 PM
Dave A Dave A is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, MI USA
Posts: 290
Default

The above advice sounds sensible to me so far. There is no hard and fast 'limit' to CR to run on pump gas, and folks certainly have ventured higher on pump gas with iron heads than 9.5:1, but 9.5:1 is a very sensible number to work with.

The exactly danger point will be a function of many other factors, such as cam timing, exhaust system, intake system, combustion chamber design/mods, vehicle weight and gearing and converter, engine materials, cooling system, timing curve, etc etc etc.

  #7  
Old 01-02-2002, 06:52 PM
Brian Baker's Avatar
Brian Baker Brian Baker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Posts: 17,184
Default

.030" over 455 with 6X heads (measuring 86cc), deck height = .013". CR is therefore computed to be 10.12:1. Total timing = 34 degrees (all in by 2600 rpm). AC-R45TS plugs gapped @ .045".

Been running it this way for 2.5 years now with either Shell 93 or Amoco 94. No signs of damage to engine by detonation. Shortblock is still holding up strong after countless hours of street driving (some of it commuting to and from work) and over 125 passes at the dragstrip.

I think cam selection does play a small role in whether CR's above 9.5:1 are safe to use with pump gas. Cylinder head design and material also plays a role (how else could Chevrolet have over 11:1 CR in their new smallblocks?).

--------------------------------------------------

79 T/A, TH400, 3.23, 4150 lbs. race weight:
12.78 @ 106, 1.81 60 ft. "on motor"
11.91 @ 115, 1.75 60 ft. "on 150-HP n2o"

__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut.
  #8  
Old 01-02-2002, 06:56 PM
Brian Baker's Avatar
Brian Baker Brian Baker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Posts: 17,184
Default

Forgot to mention, ET's I listed in previous posting are on DOT tires and through the exhaust. I do however mix race gas when spraying n2o, just to play it safe.

__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut.
  #9  
Old 01-02-2002, 07:40 PM
Tim Corcoran's Avatar
Tim Corcoran Tim Corcoran is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Willow Spring, North Carolina
Posts: 4,707
Default

Most of us do not have 93 and 94 octane fuel available at every station around town. The highest I have seen here in Arizona and California is 92. When it comes to compression in a street car it just isn't good sense to push the compression limits for the small gaim in performance. I'd say 9.5 MAX for a street car with iron heads.

Tim Corcoran

__________________
Tim Corcoran
  #10  
Old 01-02-2002, 08:33 PM
Brian Baker's Avatar
Brian Baker Brian Baker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Posts: 17,184
Default

Not disputing that point, Tim. Just sharing info based on my own personal experience.

__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut.
  #11  
Old 01-03-2002, 09:20 AM
Dave A Dave A is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, MI USA
Posts: 290
Default

Hmmmm, the octane of available fuel seems to go down with increaseing altitude, such as those found in Az, but so do octane requirements.

I also run about 10:1 on 93 octane, and have done so for 10 years with no evidence of detonation after teardown, but my preference would be for slightly less static compression and slightly more safety margin for tuning.

The new LS-1's also benefit from knock sensors, electronically controlled fuel injection and spark, smaller cylinder bore, efficient combustion chambers, CFD designed cooling system, in addition to the aluminum heads already mentioned.

  #12  
Old 01-03-2002, 11:27 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,590
Default

Brian from the factory my 78 6X motor took R45TSX (extended gap) and used 0.060 with the factory HEI.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #13  
Old 01-04-2002, 12:25 AM
Brian Baker's Avatar
Brian Baker Brian Baker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Posts: 17,184
Default

I'm running a 462. HEI triggered by an MSD-6AL (which is only good for improving idle quality and having a built in rev limiter). I've tried .060, .050, .045, .040, and .035. Noticed no difference in performance from .045 to .060, so I settled on .045

__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut.
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017