FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Pontiac - Race The next Level |
View Poll Results: Method for establishing proper rocker geometry | |||
Centered wear pattern | 7 | 35.00% | |
Mid-Lift method | 8 | 40.00% | |
Compromise of centered wear pattern and mid-lift method | 4 | 20.00% | |
Narrowest pattern regardless of position on valve tip | 1 | 5.00% | |
Sweep from intake side (closed) to exhaust side (max lift) | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Valvetrain Geometry
What method do you prefer for establishing valvetrain geometry?
*in a perfect world, one could have the narrowest wear pattern perfectly centered on the valve tip and a perfect 90* rocker angle in relation to the valve. This post is asking you to pick one option.* 1: Centered wear pattern on the valve tip (examining the sweep of the rocker tip on the valve stem tip) *regardless of angular geometry in relation to the rocker and the valve* http://www.lunatipower.com/Tech/Valv...nGeometry.aspx 2: "Mid-Lift" method (line from center-of-trunnion to center-of-roller to be 90* to valve at half of the gross lift [at the valve]) *but not necessarily a centered wear pattern at valve tip [but at least .020" or more from edge of valve tip]) https://www.google.com/amp/www.hotro...-geometry/amp/ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o5is9BsH5OU 3: A compromise between the centered wear pattern method and the mid-lift method 4: Narrowest wear pattern at valve tip regardless of angular geometry and centered wear pattern 5: Method in which rocker tip starts on the "intake side" of the valve tip (valve closed), and travels furthest outboard toward the exhaust side of the valve tip at max lift. (Refer to Diagram A" on page 1 of the below link) http://www.compcams.com/Technical/In...20Geometry.pdf
__________________
Matt 70 GTO 400 4-speed "Turbos make no noise and leave the line like Baby Diarrhea!" - GTOGeorge Last edited by PontiacMatt72; 06-27-2017 at 08:43 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I call a guy that knows exactly how to do it,he makes a house call,tells me what to order and its done.Tom
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I voted for #2.
#4 isn't really meaningful. If you could measure it accurately enough, you'd find that #2 gives the smallest travel across the valve tip, since the travel is half outward and half inward (during valve opening).
__________________
Anybody else on this planet campaign a M/T hemi Pontiac for eleven seasons? ... or has built a record breaking DOHC hemi four cylinder Pontiac? ... or has driven a couple laps of Nuerburgring with Tri-Power Pontiac power?(back in 1967) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Not to place a bug in the ointment, but ware is very dependent on the spring load, not just the sweep, so as the valve opens and the pressure goes up there is more possible ware being applied along with the amount of sweep.
Another thing along these lines to concider is that if the geometry is off some while the valve is closed or near closed, at least there is a lot of valve guide lenght to support the valve .
__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs! And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs! 1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set. Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks. 1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes. Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph. Education is what your left with once you forget things! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
solving FOR # 4 will give you # 2. The illustration in the Comp Cams cat. is just WRONG ! (#5)
__________________
GOOD IDEAS ARE OFTEN FOUND ABANDONED IN THE DUST OF PROCRASTINATION |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Agree with Jack and Ken, at the end of the day #2 is the place to be.
Comp has had a bunch of stuff wrong over the years that really screwed people up. Many would love to have a Tom S. "I know a guy" to set up their valve trains for them, LOL! Nothing wrong with that if there is a guy somewhere close to you that really knows. Tom V.
__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
He cam over and degreed the cam also!Tom
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
You have Too Many "Really Good" Friends, Tom S.
Tom V.
__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
FYI Jesel and TD take different approaches to there rocker arm geometry don't use one checking tool on the others product or you have big problems -- one company build stuff for more of a centered sweep thru the complete lift cycle and the other is more centered on narrow sweep at half to max lift -- we had MAJOR ISSUES with my sons car until we got it figured out
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Narrowest band as close to the middle as possible. Keep shimming (or remove) until you get as close as you possibly can. Don't just settle for what it is with what you have. Proper machining of all contact points in the head is critical, especially valve spring pockets. Make sure they are all uniform, end to end.
THEN order correct length pushrods.
__________________
1978 Pontiac Grand LeMans.......out next year Previous - 2001 Jerry Haas-built P/S Grand Am - former WJ car, Hoffman Racing 535" IA2, Tiger Heads/Intake, Single Dominator, PG Best ET: 7.776 @ 175.94, 1.096 60', 2375 lbs. |
Reply |
|
|