Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 04-26-2013, 10:24 AM
Blued and Painted's Avatar
Blued and Painted Blued and Painted is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Granby Colorado
Posts: 2,431
Default

Read all you can and try to make an informed decision.
Click image for larger version

Name:	002.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	57.6 KB
ID:	321224 and Bite the bullet.

__________________
Bull Nose Formula-461, 6x-4, Q-jet, HEI, TH400, 8.5 3.08, superslowjunk

Last edited by Blued and Painted; 04-26-2013 at 10:30 AM.
  #42  
Old 04-26-2013, 12:39 PM
ta man ta man is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Clinton,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 5,364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blued and Painted View Post
We all have a different ideas about what is street-able. If i want to take off and run 8 hours at 75/80 mph, i want something easy'er on the valve train. If i just want to run up and get a freezy-pop, old faithfull sounds good. On converters, I just call cliff and he sends me one.
I've never built an engine based on what it's going to sound like. I could care less as long as it suits my needs.
I agree on building an engine for performance and streetablity and not sound.....I totally disagree with the comment about run up and get a freezy-pop makes the "Old Faithful" cam sound like a dairy dip cruiser...which its not...my car drives much like a stocker with the old faithful cam mild and mellow...I also drive it over 1.5 hours to the track...also drove last year back 1.5 hours in the rain...no problems.Idles at 850 rpm,purrs like a cat down the road,runs on 89 octane......oh and runs mid 11's after driving it 1.5 hours in the middle of summer with 3.42 gears.

  #43  
Old 04-26-2013, 07:09 PM
jimmy daniel's Avatar
jimmy daniel jimmy daniel is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Montgomery,Ala. 36117
Posts: 1,913
Default

Don't get me wrong, I am most definitely building this motor with performance in mind. I want it to be as fast a manageable street engine as possible. BUT, if given the CHOICE, between two cams....I will chose the one with the most aggressive idle.

__________________
1965 TriPower GTO, 1967 GTO, 1969 GTO, 1969 Judge, 1972 GTO, 1977 Smokey and the Bandit, 1989 TA ProStreet, 1968 Firebird NHRA 10.90 racecar, 1963 Tempest S/Gas
  #44  
Old 04-26-2013, 08:50 PM
KEN CROCIE KEN CROCIE is offline
Pontiac Performance Author
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Rancho Cucamonga Ca.
Posts: 1,526
Default

I would go with Kevin's custom cam lobe selection , except I would spread it out to 112-114 lobe sep to compensate for the ex man restriction and some of the exhaust stream crosstalk that dilutes intake mixture in adjacent cyls. Yes , I know the SD man. has divided runners-but being so short, there is still crosstalk.
JD , you can call anytime to discuss.

__________________
GOOD IDEAS ARE OFTEN FOUND ABANDONED IN THE DUST OF PROCRASTINATION
  #45  
Old 04-26-2013, 09:02 PM
paul s.'s Avatar
paul s. paul s. is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ta man View Post
I agree on building an engine for performance and streetablity and not sound.....I totally disagree with the comment about run up and get a freezy-pop makes the "Old Faithful" cam sound like a dairy dip cruiser...which its not...my car drives much like a stocker with the old faithful cam mild and mellow...I also drive it over 1.5 hours to the track...also drove last year back 1.5 hours in the rain...no problems.Idles at 850 rpm,purrs like a cat down the road,runs on 89 octane......oh and runs mid 11's after driving it 1.5 hours in the middle of summer with 3.42 gears.
That's exactly my point. The op wanted a noticeable idle that a tight lsa will give. A tight lsa will not cause a car to break down or overheat or anything else. Too much duration and overlap will cause driveability issues when the cam does not fit the combination( such as low compression and long cam timing) and results in the necessary awkward ignition advance requirements. Here is a link to a video of a stroker on a test stand with ported heads and a mild 230 @ .050 cam on a 110 lsa. It went into a stock weight '72 gto with, if I recall, a th400, mild convertor and 3.23 gears. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKPxZJdW2io Just skip to the :45 mark.

On a side note, I don't think there is anything wrong with wanting your car to sound a certain way. As long as it still runs HARD! When you are behind the wheel and your 06 corvette or cobra is idling like a sewing machine, it just doesn't feel the same. Just my opinion.

__________________
Sandoval Performance
www.sandovalperformance.com
Pontiac Crate Engines
CNC Edelbrock heads
Custom Ground Cams
JOHNSON Limited Travel Hydraulic Roller Lifters

Last edited by paul s.; 04-26-2013 at 09:14 PM.
  #46  
Old 04-26-2013, 09:07 PM
paul s.'s Avatar
paul s. paul s. is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 327
Default

Glad to see you entered the discussion, Mr Crocie. I have read many articles featuring your engines and found them very informative.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KEN CROCIE View Post
I would go with Kevin's custom cam lobe selection , except I would spread it out to 112-114 lobe sep to compensate for the ex man restriction and some of the exhaust stream crosstalk that dilutes intake mixture in adjacent cyls. Yes , I know the SD man. has divided runners-but being so short, there is still crosstalk.
JD , you can call anytime to discuss.
That is another reason I am a fan of dual planes below 6,000 rpm.

__________________
Sandoval Performance
www.sandovalperformance.com
Pontiac Crate Engines
CNC Edelbrock heads
Custom Ground Cams
JOHNSON Limited Travel Hydraulic Roller Lifters

Last edited by paul s.; 04-26-2013 at 09:13 PM.
  #47  
Old 04-26-2013, 10:30 PM
jimmy daniel's Avatar
jimmy daniel jimmy daniel is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Montgomery,Ala. 36117
Posts: 1,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KEN CROCIE View Post
I would go with Kevin's custom cam lobe selection , except I would spread it out to 112-114 lobe sep to compensate for the ex man restriction and some of the exhaust stream crosstalk that dilutes intake mixture in adjacent cyls. Yes , I know the SD man. has divided runners-but being so short, there is still crosstalk.
JD , you can call anytime to discuss.
Back in the day I used a lot of Kens advice and parts and always great success. A true Pontiac guru!

__________________
1965 TriPower GTO, 1967 GTO, 1969 GTO, 1969 Judge, 1972 GTO, 1977 Smokey and the Bandit, 1989 TA ProStreet, 1968 Firebird NHRA 10.90 racecar, 1963 Tempest S/Gas
  #48  
Old 04-27-2013, 08:29 AM
CROCIE JR's Avatar
CROCIE JR CROCIE JR is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: AUSTIN, TX
Posts: 253
Default

Well there you go then.

  #49  
Old 04-27-2013, 06:00 PM
KEN CROCIE KEN CROCIE is offline
Pontiac Performance Author
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Rancho Cucamonga Ca.
Posts: 1,526
Default

That kid always tries to have the last word !

__________________
GOOD IDEAS ARE OFTEN FOUND ABANDONED IN THE DUST OF PROCRASTINATION
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:04 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017