Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 06-30-2023, 09:15 AM
PunchT37's Avatar
PunchT37 PunchT37 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lafayette,LA
Posts: 3,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Anonymous View Post
I'd verify the timing mark on the balancer is correct before going to the rest of the trouble. If it has an outer and inner ring, and the outer slipped, you arent where you think you are.
True but, that won’t cause the 195 psi on a 350.

  #42  
Old 06-30-2023, 10:36 AM
77 TRASHCAN's Avatar
77 TRASHCAN 77 TRASHCAN is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 31May2013 Temporary home to the world's widest (that we know of) tornado. Lord, NO more Please...
Posts: 6,599
Default

I'm trying to think of things and a mindset to help the OP'er in this process.
IF the gear dots are not properly aligned, this is a problem.
BUT, if the dots ARE properly lined up, this could ALSO be a problem due to improper manufacturing.

These are ONLY things to look at after the timing cover comes off.
The next thing that HAS to happen is the degree wheel installation and the dial indicator on the number 1 pushrod/rocker to see where the ICL is.

Man, this is a tedious process, any way you do it. But with the engine installed.......

I'm wondering what type of gear set is being used?
Some of the stockist types even have 3 keyways in the lower gear for timing adjustment.
If everything looks proper, an adjustment could possibly be made now?

A nice thing about Pontiac timing gears is the lower gear being a slip fit.

__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A.
I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977.

Shut it off
Shut it off
Buddy, I just shut your Prius down...
  #43  
Old 06-30-2023, 10:37 AM
77 TRASHCAN's Avatar
77 TRASHCAN 77 TRASHCAN is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 31May2013 Temporary home to the world's widest (that we know of) tornado. Lord, NO more Please...
Posts: 6,599
Default

I'm trying to think of things and a mindset to help the OP'er in this process.
IF the gear dots are not properly aligned, this is a problem.
BUT, if the dots ARE properly lined up, this could ALSO be a problem due to improper manufacturing.

These are ONLY things to look at after the timing cover comes off.
The next thing that HAS to happen is the degree wheel installation and the dial indicator on the number 1 pushrod/rocker to see where the ICL is.

Man, this is a tedious process, any way you do it. But with the engine installed.......

I'm wondering what type of gear set is being used?
Some of the stockist types even have 3 keyways in the lower gear for timing adjustment.
If everything looks proper, an adjustment could possibly be made now?

A nice thing about Pontiac timing gears is the lower gear being a slip fit.

__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A.
I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977.

Shut it off
Shut it off
Buddy, I just shut your Prius down...
  #44  
Old 07-17-2023, 11:05 PM
cabhop cabhop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: WA
Posts: 80
Default

Welp, I pull the cover and verified the Edelbrock timing set, its dot to dot. I'm on the fence if I should degree this thing or just slap a 2801 in it and call it a day...

https://static.summitracing.com/glob...er-linktim.pdf

  #45  
Old 07-17-2023, 11:36 PM
b-man's Avatar
b-man b-man is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 16,492
Default

I would spend your time degreeing the 2801 cam that is really better suited for your high compression 350.

The Melling SPC-7 068 350 HO manual trans cam would be my pick because it has more seat to seat timing than the 2801. I know most people shy away from the 068 because of the .407” lift which some consider to be too low, but it does run very well nonetheless.

__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42
1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56
2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23
  #46  
Old 07-18-2023, 12:27 AM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 1,722
Default

The 2801 would drop the cranking compression 8 to 10 points from the 2800. Still too high.

SPC-7 would be about 15 points less, it is a better choice, I agree with B-man. Plus the SPC-7 will out run the 2801 is this.

It is cranking almost 200 now, 10 less would not make it be happy on pump gas yet.

  #47  
Old 07-18-2023, 12:25 PM
PunchT37's Avatar
PunchT37 PunchT37 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lafayette,LA
Posts: 3,257
Default

I see figure 3 and figure 6 for a "straight up" install. Which way is it installed? All the poncho`s I`ve done have the crank key around the 2 o`clock position no matter if it`s 4 degree adv, standard, or retard.


What say ya`ll? Am I crazy?

You`re only moving the cam gear 4 degrees in relation to top dead center.

  #48  
Old 07-18-2023, 12:46 PM
geeteeohguy's Avatar
geeteeohguy geeteeohguy is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 5,322
Default

In my experience, changing cam profile to compensate for too much compression in a Pontiac is simply robbing Peter to pay Paul. You can to more aggressive and eliminate low rpm cyl. pressure and ping, but it will come back on the big end at WOT. And vise-versa. The only solution for too much compression in a Pontiac is lowering the compression. If it were me, I'd bolt on another set of heads and run the stock intake.

__________________
Jeff
  #49  
Old 07-18-2023, 03:13 PM
cabhop cabhop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: WA
Posts: 80
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PunchT37 View Post
I see figure 3 and figure 6 for a "straight up" install. Which way is it installed? All the poncho`s I`ve done have the crank key around the 2 o`clock position no matter if it`s 4 degree adv, standard, or retard.


What say ya`ll? Am I crazy?

You`re only moving the cam gear 4 degrees in relation to top dead center.
It was figure 6; figure three was for Ford...

  #50  
Old 07-23-2023, 12:00 AM
cabhop cabhop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: WA
Posts: 80
Default

Now to find some pre 2000 lifters...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20230722_201903078.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	44.2 KB
ID:	616531  

  #51  
Old 07-23-2023, 12:39 AM
VCho455's Avatar
VCho455 VCho455 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: PDX OR
Posts: 227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geeteeohguy View Post
In my experience, changing cam profile to compensate for too much compression in a Pontiac is simply robbing Peter to pay Paul. You can to more aggressive and eliminate low rpm cyl. pressure and ping, but it will come back on the big end at WOT. And vise-versa. The only solution for too much compression in a Pontiac is lowering the compression. If it were me, I'd bolt on another set of heads and run the stock intake.
Exactly what will happen whether a Pontiac or other. The problem is a combination of the wrong mechanical components.

You might be able to solve the problem with a special order set of head gaskets.
The compression ratio calculator in the link should help you get closer to an answer.

https://diamondracing.net/p-10-compr...alculator.html

__________________
If it breaks. I didn't want it in the first place.
_____________________________________________
69 GTO \ 72 FIREBIRD \ 1/2 OF A 64 GTO \ 70 JAVELIN \ 52 FORD PU \ 51 GMC PU \ 29 FORD PU \ 85 ALFA ROMEO SPYDER \ A HANDFUL OF ODD DUCATI'S \ 88 S10 LT1 BLAZER & MY DAILY DRIVER 67 SUBURBAN.

Last edited by VCho455; 07-23-2023 at 12:44 AM.
  #52  
Old 07-24-2023, 10:32 AM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 1,722
Default

I agree you can do a cam swap to a bigger cam and not change the fuel octane requirements. Bigger cam and lower pumping compression does not automatically mean the octane requirement is lowered.

Comparing the 2800 summit to the Melling SPC-7. The SPC-7 is really not much gentler, it only is gentler because it has less lift, it has very similar intensities too the Summit cam.

The SPC-7 has a 1.5* more overlap than the summit 2800. The most common mistake I see builders do when swapping cams to spread compression out with a bigger cam is adding more overlap. Adding overlap looses bottom end power, and increases the VE at the torque peak. The Summit 2801 has 10* more overlap than the 2800. That extra 10* overlap counters quite a bit of the drop in pumping compression the 2801 provides by it’s extra overlap. The SPC-7 spreads out the power more.


An SPC-7, at 9.7 SCR, in this engine will have similar low end torque and low end manors as it would with the 2800 cam and closer to 8.7 compression. The SPC-7 will be capable of pumping about 10 lbs more compression than the 2800 on the same octane fuel with similar low end power and throttle response. The higher compression SPC-7 combo ends up being more powerful and more efficient than if you were to drop the compression to a place were there 2800 was happy.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017