#1  
Old 01-28-2023, 11:27 PM
chiphead's Avatar
chiphead chiphead is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 5,182
Default Strange RPM intake port leak?

What is the typical cause of a RPM intake not sealing off on a '69 head?

Had something super strange happen today. I went to do the cam break-in on that 69 400 I did a cam swap on. So I roll the car outside and fill the 750 double pumper with gas. Somehow when I put gas into the secondary bowl vent, all the gas came out the boosters and filled the intake with about 4oz of gas. That's most of what I put in, so it all went right down the intake. A subject for another thread I guess.

But the weird thing is that gas started to show up on the valley pan and run down the front of the engine block. WTF? Close investigation found the intake runner for cyls 2&4 were not sealed to the head, at the bottom of the port. So the gas runs down the runner and leaked out of the bottom of the port. Needless to say I didn't try to fire it off.

I pulled the intake off and didn't find anything super obvious, other than the impression from the intake on the gasket was faint, basically sucked. Bolts were tight, the intake wasn't hitting the valley pan, the gaskets are the fel-pro 9980. The intake came with the motor and there was skin coat of sealer on both sides of the gaskets that came out. The valley pan is new from Butler and I clearanced it for the intake.

The orange alignment plugs were in place, but were mashed to chit. Can they hold the intake off that badly? Is the RPM supposed to have a relief machined for them? What likely happened?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20230128_210001914.jpg
Views:	201
Size:	69.2 KB
ID:	606244   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20230128_205945621.jpg
Views:	216
Size:	65.5 KB
ID:	606245   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20230128_215419877.jpg
Views:	193
Size:	50.8 KB
ID:	606246   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20230128_204056659.jpg
Views:	182
Size:	88.1 KB
ID:	606247  

__________________
I could explain all this to the girl at the parts store, but she'd probably call the asylum.

White '67 LeMans 407/TH350/Ford 3.89... RIP
Red '67 LeMans. 407/TH400/Ford 3.25

Last edited by chiphead; 01-28-2023 at 11:42 PM.
  #2  
Old 01-28-2023, 11:40 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,764
Default

Looks like wrong gaskets,need the smaller heat X over hole.Just did a engine with a set of 48s.Tom

The Following User Says Thank You to tom s For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 01-28-2023, 11:48 PM
ID67goat's Avatar
ID67goat ID67goat is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 411
Default

Bottom of intake (at ports) hitting the valley pan preventing a proper seal when torqued down?

  #4  
Old 01-29-2023, 12:09 AM
77 TRASHCAN's Avatar
77 TRASHCAN 77 TRASHCAN is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 31May2013 Temporary home to the world's widest (that we know of) tornado. Lord, NO more Please...
Posts: 6,591
Default

Decking a block and/or milling heads can cause issues with the intake fitting over the valley pan. Some grinding on the valley pan may be needed.

__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A.
I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977.

Shut it off
Shut it off
Buddy, I just shut your Prius down...
  #5  
Old 01-29-2023, 12:46 AM
Pontiac Derek Pontiac Derek is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: portland or.
Posts: 328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chiphead View Post
What is the typical cause of a RPM intake not sealing off on a '69 head?

Had something super strange happen today. I went to do the cam break-in on that 69 400 I did a cam swap on. So I roll the car outside and fill the 750 double pumper with gas. Somehow when I put gas into the secondary bowl vent, all the gas came out the boosters and filled the intake with about 4oz of gas. That's most of what I put in, so it all went right down the intake. A subject for another thread I guess.

But the weird thing is that gas started to show up on the valley pan and run down the front of the engine block. WTF? Close investigation found the intake runner for cyls 2&4 were not sealed to the head, at the bottom of the port. So the gas runs down the runner and leaked out of the bottom of the port. Needless to say I didn't try to fire it off.

I pulled the intake off and didn't find anything super obvious, other than the impression from the intake on the gasket was faint, basically sucked. Bolts were tight, the intake wasn't hitting the valley pan, the gaskets are the fel-pro 9980. The intake came with the motor and there was skin coat of sealer on both sides of the gaskets that came out. The valley pan is new from Butler and I clearanced it for the intake.

The orange alignment plugs were in place, but were mashed to chit. Can they hold the intake off that badly? Is the RPM supposed to have a relief machined for them? What likely happened?
For what it’s worth I never leave those orange guides in the gasket, I don’t feel like they squash down all the way, not saying it will have a problem every single time but the only reason I use those for scribing my lines for port matching, but sounds like the heads might not have been milled perfectly slat leaving a slight Lee bigger gap at the bottom of your intake gasket than the top, or manufacturer error

__________________
Build it Right Build it Once!!!
Just another Engine Builder from the Northwest lol
  #6  
Old 01-29-2023, 09:20 AM
400 Lemans's Avatar
400 Lemans 400 Lemans is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 552
Default

Some people will grind a beveled edge along both bottom sides off intake for valley clearance. I had the same issue as you, but i trimmed down the cork gasket on the pan as far as i could, without any grinding for clearance. But beveling intake would work better.

  #7  
Old 01-29-2023, 09:45 AM
25stevem's Avatar
25stevem 25stevem is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,744
Default

X2 with post 3.

Pull the valley pan off and only seal it with gray form-a- gasket.
Do not use a gasket!
I , as others have found that they never fit 100% right anyway!

Then get some some clay or aluminum foil, ball some up and sit it on the left and right side of the lip of the valley pan.

Next drop the intake on with no gasket and see if it still rest on the lip of the valley pan.

If it does then you know you you’ve got some trim grinding to do as posted above also.

Ideally you want a hair of clearance without the intake gasket in place unless you are using a thick Mr Gasket .050” type already.

__________________
I do stuff for reasons.
  #8  
Old 01-29-2023, 10:22 AM
78w72 78w72 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: iowa
Posts: 4,683
Default

he said the intake wasnt hitting the valley pan... but worth double checking that again.

i use the tomahawk v/p that is the same as what butler is selling and it needed to be clearanced a little more in the areas where the intake ports are on a factory 69 iron intake, i did a little grinding on those areas of the intake too just to be sure.

  #9  
Old 01-29-2023, 10:41 AM
Holeshot71's Avatar
Holeshot71 Holeshot71 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 371
Default

Those plastic gasket holders aren’t design to be squished with the gasket. The factory intakes are cut back to clear them. I usually use a little silicone on both sides of the gasket around the water crossover and a little on the other end to hold the gaskets in place. HTH

__________________
'71 GTO, 406 CID, 60916, 1.65 HS, '69 #46 Heads 230CFM, 800CFM Q-jet, TH400, 12 Bolt 3.55
'72 Lemans, Lucerne Blue, WU2, T41, L78, M22, G80
The Following User Says Thank You to Holeshot71 For This Useful Post:
  #10  
Old 01-29-2023, 11:06 AM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ID67goat View Post
Bottom of intake (at ports) hitting the valley pan preventing a proper seal when torqued down?
I'd look at this. Looks like the bottom of the runners are as cast. Most need some grinding at the bottom.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #11  
Old 01-29-2023, 04:29 PM
Joe's Garage Joe's Garage is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Las Vega$, NV
Posts: 637
Default Another possibility

I notice in your pic that the PCV line appears to have been run back under the intake on top of the valley pan.

I also notice that the hose is routed over almost the highest spot on the valley pan - right next to the intake ports for cylinders #2 and #4.

I don't recall how much clearance there is between the bottom of the intake and the valley pan, but it's probably not too much.

Is there a possibility that the hose it somehow taller than the clearance at that point and that it is holding the intake up just slightly?

So that's something else for you to check. Good luck!

  #12  
Old 01-29-2023, 07:41 PM
TCSGTO's Avatar
TCSGTO TCSGTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Warren,Ohio,USA
Posts: 1,675
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pontiac Derek View Post
sounds like the heads might not have been milled perfectly slat leaving a slight Lee bigger gap at the bottom of your intake gasket than the top, or manufacturer error
+1
Some manufacturing lots of the RPM needed the head surfaces milled right out of the box to fit.
The silicone on the gaskets when it was removed might have been a clue.

__________________
68 GTO,3860#
Stock Original 400/M-20 Muncie,3.55’s
13.86 @ 100
Old combo:
462 10.75 CR,,SD 330CFM Round Port E's,Old Faithful cam,Jim Hand Continental,3.42's.
1968 Pontiac GTO : 11.114 @ 120.130 MPH

New combo:
517 MR-1,10.8 CR,SD 350CFM E's,QFT 950/Northwind,246/252 HR,9.5” 4000 stall,3.42's
636HP/654TQ
1.452 10.603 @ 125.09
http://www.dragtimes.com/Pontiac-GTO...lip-31594.html
  #13  
Old 01-30-2023, 08:26 AM
chiphead's Avatar
chiphead chiphead is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 5,182
Default

All good suggestions!
I went back and clearanced the chit out of the intake runners with a die grinder. I layed them back further after i took the below pictures and test fit it. They now clear the valley pan with no gasket. I added countersinks in the intake flange for the orange gasket locators. I also chased all the intake threads with a tap.

Responses to a few observations:
Intake bolt holes line up with no gasket installed.
I routed the PCV hose after I had the intake installed, so it shouldn't have affected things.
The valley pan was clearanced before I installed it without a gasket. .
The PO did make a reference to intake leaks with this RPM intake but I shrugged it off. This is the same motor that supposedly had years of carb problems with a tri-power setup.
No idea of engine history, can't tell if it was decked. Intake flanges on heads are stock. Looks like a basic ring and bearing job 30 years ago.

What else do I need to check before I try to put it back together?
How can I tell if the intake flanges are at the wrong angle?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20230129_211012174.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	57.2 KB
ID:	606349   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20230129_211030568.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	53.2 KB
ID:	606350  

__________________
I could explain all this to the girl at the parts store, but she'd probably call the asylum.

White '67 LeMans 407/TH350/Ford 3.89... RIP
Red '67 LeMans. 407/TH400/Ford 3.25

Last edited by chiphead; 01-30-2023 at 08:38 AM.
  #14  
Old 01-30-2023, 04:30 PM
Matt Meaney's Avatar
Matt Meaney Matt Meaney is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: torrington ct
Posts: 1,433
Default

when i tried to put an new RPM intake on a 400 with 62's, it really wouldn't fit. with the felpro gaskets in place, the bolt holes didn't line up for nothing. take out the gaskets and they were centered in the intake holes. measured the gaskets to be .060 thick and had that milled off the each side of the intake flanges. the holes were now centered with the gasket in place. ended up having to clearance the valley pan as well.

__________________
“We don’t build a ‘luxury’ car. We build a performance car then we make it luxurious.”
  #15  
Old 02-01-2023, 02:30 PM
chiphead's Avatar
chiphead chiphead is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 5,182
Default

I had another RPM that had been cut .060 for an engine that had been decked. I test fit it on this engine with a gasket and it didn't fit, there were gaps at the ports. I pulled it off and put the uncut RPM back on. This time it looks like the intake cinched down properly on the gaskets.

It's now all back together waiting on me to fire it off. By the way, do you need to prime the secondary fuel bowl on a QF 750 doublepumper? Will it run well on the primary bowl long enough for the pump to refill the carb?

__________________
I could explain all this to the girl at the parts store, but she'd probably call the asylum.

White '67 LeMans 407/TH350/Ford 3.89... RIP
Red '67 LeMans. 407/TH400/Ford 3.25
  #16  
Old 02-01-2023, 03:15 PM
Joe's Garage Joe's Garage is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Las Vega$, NV
Posts: 637
Default Priming the font bowl only will work.

You only need the gas in the front to start the engine.

The secondary bowl will fill as soon as the engine starts.

Good luck!

  #17  
Old 02-01-2023, 05:01 PM
25stevem's Avatar
25stevem 25stevem is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,744
Default

That carb is a 4 corner idle circuit type.

While yes, it will start with just the primary fuel bowl filled up it will not idle properly until the secondary is near filled also.

__________________
I do stuff for reasons.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:57 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017