#1  
Old 12-12-2022, 09:13 AM
mrmark1957 mrmark1957 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 81
Default Will this piston/head/cam combo work on pump gas?

I need advise from the experienced gurus here. I picked up a '73 Lemans with a fresh rebuilt .030 over 400 motor. Has Silvo-lite 1526 pistons ( -10.0cc) and probably .020 down in the block, 6X-8 heads. 204/214 Summit 2800 cam, Fel-pro gaskets and ARP rod bolts. Quadrajet, stock intake, logs, 2" stock exhaust. 3.23 gears, stock 400 Turbo and converter. Engine runs nice but doesn't have much power. I have access to a freshly rebuilt pair of big valve # 13 heads (checked at 73.5 cc). Can I bolt these on with a little more cam ( a Summit 2801 or 2802 or an 068 ) and run this on pump gas on the street ? Or will compression be too high / quench too big and have detonation / pinging ? I would like to give this car some go with a simple head and cam swap. TIA !

  #2  
Old 12-12-2022, 10:23 AM
Stan Weiss's Avatar
Stan Weiss Stan Weiss is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 5,000
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmark1957 View Post
I need advise from the experienced gurus here. I picked up a '73 Lemans with a fresh rebuilt .030 over 400 motor. Has Silvo-lite 1526 pistons ( -10.0cc) and probably .020 down in the block, 6X-8 heads. 204/214 Summit 2800 cam, Fel-pro gaskets and ARP rod bolts. Quadrajet, stock intake, logs, 2" stock exhaust. 3.23 gears, stock 400 Turbo and converter. Engine runs nice but doesn't have much power. I have access to a freshly rebuilt pair of big valve # 13 heads (checked at 73.5 cc). Can I bolt these on with a little more cam ( a Summit 2801 or 2802 or an 068 ) and run this on pump gas on the street ? Or will compression be too high / quench too big and have detonation / pinging ? I would like to give this car some go with a simple head and cam swap. TIA !
I for one would like some information about this engine.

Can you do a cranking compression test and post the numbers?

Also does anyone else think that the exhaust maybe holding this engine back some?

Stan

__________________
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization - Cam Selection Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
Download FREE 14 Trial IOP / Flow Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV/Flow_..._Day_Trial.php
Pontiac Pump Gas List
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_gas.htm
Using PMD Block and Heads List
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_pmd.htm
  #3  
Old 12-12-2022, 10:55 AM
25stevem's Avatar
25stevem 25stevem is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,744
Default

It’s no wonder the motor runs like crap!
Assuming your 6X-8 heads have not been milled I get a total CC volume by using the rest of your numbers, plus the head gasket volume that your missing of 9.4 CCs, your total is 123.8 CCs!!

Your compression would then be 6.7 to 1, yikes!

Put on those other heads right away if they have been gone thru and are fresh.

If your using a late intake manifold you will need to run the right intake gasket to seal up the bigger exh crossover in these heads as compared to the 6X heads.

__________________
I do stuff for reasons.
The Following User Says Thank You to 25stevem For This Useful Post:
  #4  
Old 12-12-2022, 11:13 AM
Stan Weiss's Avatar
Stan Weiss Stan Weiss is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 5,000
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 25stevem View Post
It’s no wonder the motor runs like crap!
Assuming your 6X-8 heads have not been milled I get a total CC volume by using the rest of your numbers, plus the head gasket volume that your missing of 9.4 CCs, your total is 123.8 CCs!!

Your compression would then be 6.7 to 1, yikes!

Put on those other heads right away if they have been gone thru and are fresh.

If your using a late intake manifold you will need to run the right intake gasket to seal up the bigger exh crossover in these heads as compared to the 6X heads.
Steve,
Just using your total number (123.8 cc's) I get 7.7:1 CR for a 30 over 400. Which is still very low.

But not knowing what he has is why I wanted to see what the cranking compression numbers were.

Stan

__________________
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization - Cam Selection Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
Download FREE 14 Trial IOP / Flow Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV/Flow_..._Day_Trial.php
Pontiac Pump Gas List
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_gas.htm
Using PMD Block and Heads List
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_pmd.htm
  #5  
Old 12-12-2022, 11:26 AM
mrmark1957 mrmark1957 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 81
Default

The heads have not been cut, they were checked at 100 cc's. I will get cranking compression and post it.

  #6  
Old 12-12-2022, 11:55 AM
25stevem's Avatar
25stevem 25stevem is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,744
Default

Head 100 Cc
Dish. 10.
Head gasket. 9.4
.020” deck 4.43

Total = 123.8
Do we agree on that CC total?

4.150 x 3.750 = 50.742 cid, or 831.2 CCs

831.2 / 123.8 = 6.7 no?

__________________
I do stuff for reasons.
  #7  
Old 12-12-2022, 12:18 PM
Murf Murf is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: St. Marys Ks. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,486
Default

Shouldn’t it be 831.2 + 123.8 / 123.8 ?

  #8  
Old 12-12-2022, 12:21 PM
25stevem's Avatar
25stevem 25stevem is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,744
Default

Yes, your right, i screwed it up!
I always seem to do that wrong, sorry.

__________________
I do stuff for reasons.
The Following User Says Thank You to 25stevem For This Useful Post:
  #9  
Old 12-12-2022, 12:30 PM
25stevem's Avatar
25stevem 25stevem is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,744
Default

So your new compression at best would be 9.54 to 1.

Cam wise I would run something with the duration close to the 068, but with more lift and on a 112.

__________________
I do stuff for reasons.
  #10  
Old 12-12-2022, 01:19 PM
Verdoro 68's Avatar
Verdoro 68 Verdoro 68 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Clayton, CA
Posts: 2,806
Default

Ooof. Reminds me of my first rebuild, except I had a way too big cam with the 6X-8s. Those 13s and and 068 should really wake it up.

Will the pistons .020 in the hole make it a little more prone to detonation?

__________________
Ken
'68 GTO - Ram Air II 464 - 236/242 roller - 9.5” TSP converter - 3.55 posi (build thread | walk around)
'95 Comp T/A #6 M6 - bone stock (pics)
  #11  
Old 12-12-2022, 01:42 PM
mrmark1957 mrmark1957 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 81
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 25stevem View Post
So your new compression at best would be 9.54 to 1.

Cam wise I would run something with the duration close to the 068, but with more lift and on a 112.
That would basically be the Summit 2801.

  #12  
Old 12-12-2022, 04:21 PM
Dragncar Dragncar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Humbolt County California
Posts: 8,284
Default

13s are a great head for a 400 and the 2802 is a fine choice. Run it.

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dragncar For This Useful Post:
  #13  
Old 12-12-2022, 06:18 PM
F ROCK's Avatar
F ROCK F ROCK is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: sicklerville nj 08081
Posts: 1,938
Default

Wallace racing site lists a 400 cid with 6x heads @ 7.6:1 with stock pistons; not sure if they were beveled on the edge:

1975 400 185 HP Y9 A 7.6 255 6X 1-2 7045167 Block Casting # 481988/late 500557?

My 1971 GTO had the ys400 with 96cc heads listed @ 8.2:1 , and i suppose it was 250HP. It Ran pretty good.

The Following User Says Thank You to F ROCK For This Useful Post:
  #14  
Old 12-12-2022, 06:35 PM
grandam1979 grandam1979 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio, Findlay
Posts: 1,430
Default

I came up with 7.81 using butlers calculator and provided information I did use .035 for head gasket

The Following User Says Thank You to grandam1979 For This Useful Post:
  #15  
Old 12-12-2022, 06:40 PM
25stevem's Avatar
25stevem 25stevem is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,744
Default

Using .035” assumes the gasket is round and it’s not, so it’s volume in CCs is bigger then what that .035” factor would come up with.

__________________
I do stuff for reasons.
  #16  
Old 12-12-2022, 06:45 PM
25stevem's Avatar
25stevem 25stevem is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,744
Default

Back to your question Stan, yes.
If nothing else those 2” head pipes need to go!

__________________
I do stuff for reasons.
  #17  
Old 12-12-2022, 07:56 PM
grandam1979 grandam1979 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio, Findlay
Posts: 1,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 25stevem View Post
Using .035” assumes the gasket is round and it’s not, so it’s volume in CCs is bigger then what that .035” factor would come up with.
So just for you I did it at .050 also 7.62 it’s a estimate but I know you will be dead on. I think the thing is compression is low making the power low but I will let you experts take it from here .

  #18  
Old 12-12-2022, 08:25 PM
KEN CROCIE KEN CROCIE is offline
Pontiac Performance Author
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Rancho Cucamonga Ca.
Posts: 1,522
Default

swept vol. (disp. }, plus dead vol. ( the total combustion chamber vol.) divided by the dead vol.= C/R.
I get 7.71 C/R

__________________
GOOD IDEAS ARE OFTEN FOUND ABANDONED IN THE DUST OF PROCRASTINATION
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to KEN CROCIE For This Useful Post:
  #19  
Old 12-12-2022, 09:49 PM
77 TRASHCAN's Avatar
77 TRASHCAN 77 TRASHCAN is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 31May2013 Temporary home to the world's widest (that we know of) tornado. Lord, NO more Please...
Posts: 6,591
Default

I use the calculator on S.D. Performance site.

My 77 TA came with the lowest HP engine, 7.6:1, 400 Pontiac engine, 6X-8 heads.

The tune spec was either 16 or 18 degrees, advanced.

Just wondering where your 400 stands, concerning timing?

My car ran pretty well, was peppy to drive. Obviously not a world beater like earlier Pontiac 400's were, but was a great driver.

__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A.
I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977.

Shut it off
Shut it off
Buddy, I just shut your Prius down...
  #20  
Old 12-12-2022, 10:19 PM
mrmark1957 mrmark1957 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 81
Default Compression tested the motor

I went into the garage tonight and compression tested the motor. At 35*F cylinder numbers 1 and 3 cranked at 130 and 135 psi with the throttle wide open and a brand new DieHard battery. Ran the car for about 15 minutes until hot and repeated the test. This time cylinders 1 and 3 cranked at 145 and 150 psi. Out of curiosity I walked over to my 67 GP with a stock rebuilt YH 400 (670 heads) and it cranked at 175 psi cold with a 3 year old battery. That car runs well on 93 Octane. I am realizing I will have to upgrade the exhaust also now to 2 1/2 inch and the log manifolds should go too.

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017