Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-13-2002, 08:30 PM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Vineland,N.J.
Posts: 1,525
Default

Finally made it to the track with new car (67 GTO). Made to half pass to get use to car and to full passes. 11.06/121.8 and 11.095/121.13 with both 60' times at 1.593. I feel these should be a little better. I have stock boxed arms, air bags(10/20), rear sway bar and 90/10 shocks up front with 50/50 in the back. I'm running 13.5 et streets. Pinion angle is 2 degrees. I hear it should be 6 is this right? Do you think it will help the 60's?
Thanks Mike S

  #2  
Old 04-13-2002, 08:30 PM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Vineland,N.J.
Posts: 1,525
Default

Finally made it to the track with new car (67 GTO). Made to half pass to get use to car and to full passes. 11.06/121.8 and 11.095/121.13 with both 60' times at 1.593. I feel these should be a little better. I have stock boxed arms, air bags(10/20), rear sway bar and 90/10 shocks up front with 50/50 in the back. I'm running 13.5 et streets. Pinion angle is 2 degrees. I hear it should be 6 is this right? Do you think it will help the 60's?
Thanks Mike S

  #3  
Old 04-14-2002, 03:01 AM
Ron's Avatar
Ron Ron is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: In The Staging Lanes
Posts: 3,582
Default

60 foots are really pretty good. I think you should consider some adjustable shocks such as Konis and set them for full stiff. It helped my 60 foot times a lot.

Ron

__________________


Due to the current economic conditions...the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.

Meet you at the finish line.....don't be late!
  #4  
Old 04-14-2002, 05:19 AM
Goatman Goatman is offline
On Vacation
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Dighton, MA
Posts: 3,665
Default

I had a 1.58 sixty when I went 10.62 @ 128. Seems like you're loosing it on the top end, not the bottom. Possible converter slippage issues?????

Go with the HAL shocks, Konis were good about a decade ago.

  #5  
Old 04-14-2002, 10:08 PM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,487
Default

How about INCREASAING the ET Streets PSI to about 12 PSI, then 14 PSI.

I got better results there with the higher PSI, then the age-old degcreasing PSI to as low as 8PSI..that was old-slick technology.

Also, how about the off-idle launch?

Also, how about mechanically-delaying the Secondary opening.

H.I. Stud

__________________
12.24/111.6MPH/1.76 60'/28"/3.54:1/SP-TH400/469 R96A/236-244-112LC/1050&TorkerI//3850Lbs//15MPG/89oct

Sold 2003: 12.00/112MPH/1.61 60'/26"x3.31:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Q-Jet-Torker/3650Lbs//18MPG 94oct
Sold 1994: 11.00/123MPH/1.50 60'/29.5"x4.10:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Dual600s-Wenzler/3250Lbs//94oct
  #6  
Old 04-15-2002, 12:29 PM
Ron's Avatar
Ron Ron is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: In The Staging Lanes
Posts: 3,582
Default

Neither the Koni or Hal shock provides control of the rebound so either shock would be suitable for this application. The Hal shock is easier to adjust using a dial and does not have to be un bolted.

In trying to solve a traction issue in my '65 GTO and the same for Jim Taylor in his '64 Tempest we found that the stiffest setting provided the best help. Our cars are heavy stock type of suspension cars. We both use adjustable upper control arms, sway bars, and air bags. We both experienced bunny hoping with our cars, Jim Taylors was much sever than mine. To try and eliminate the hoping and obtain maximum traction we experimented with different settings with our upper control arms. The brackets that attache to the rear end has three holes in them which you can put the upper control arms in. I starated with my arm in the upper hole and I believe Jim started in the bottom hole. Over time we both went up and down and changed our pinion angles also. At this point both us us have our upper control arms in the bottom holes with full stiff shocks and a pinion angle of about 5 degrees. I have good traction and Jim for the most point does also. Jim still has a little bunny hopping but mine is all but eliminated. Now Jim makes a lot more horsepower than I do. Jim runs high 10's at 120 - 122 MPH. I run 12 teens at 110 - 112 MPH.

I have never run a street slick. My present slick is a M/T ET slick, 28 x 10.5 x 15. In talking with some friends of mine that race Stock Eliminator in NHRA I started to run more air in my slicks. I now run between 16 and 17 PSI and that also has helped with my traction issues. Also I now run tubes in my slicks. That helps with make the side wall stifer and again this has helped my traction issues.

Hope this is of some help. Good luck with the carand have fun.

Ron

[ April 15, 2002: Message edited by: Ron ]

[ April 15, 2002: Message edited by: Ron ]</p>

__________________


Due to the current economic conditions...the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.

Meet you at the finish line.....don't be late!
  #7  
Old 04-15-2002, 05:40 PM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,487
Default

...more PSI. Who woulda thought.

Slicks these days sure are better than 10+years ago.

__________________
12.24/111.6MPH/1.76 60'/28"/3.54:1/SP-TH400/469 R96A/236-244-112LC/1050&TorkerI//3850Lbs//15MPG/89oct

Sold 2003: 12.00/112MPH/1.61 60'/26"x3.31:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Q-Jet-Torker/3650Lbs//18MPG 94oct
Sold 1994: 11.00/123MPH/1.50 60'/29.5"x4.10:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Dual600s-Wenzler/3250Lbs//94oct
  #8  
Old 04-15-2002, 08:53 PM
Ron's Avatar
Ron Ron is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: In The Staging Lanes
Posts: 3,582
Default

Not me that is for sure. I was from the school that less air is better. Well I tried less air and the car was like driving on ice. I tried more air out of pure frustration. I got pissed one day at the track and put in 20 pounds of air and WOW, I had some traction. Over time I experimented with air pressure. At 20 PSI the patch of rubber on the track was small and it was a little squirrely at top speed. Testing is how I arrived at my present air pressure. My business partner is the Stock Eliminator persom I was talking to about air pressure. Lots of track time, lots of talking to other racers. I must say that all of my problems were brought on by myself. The suspension underneath my GTO was built for road racing. The drag racing bug hit me and here I am. Stiff shocks and springs along with lowering the car is not always good for drag racing traction. I stll have not removed the road racing suspension but I did remove the front sway bar and changed the front and rear shocks. The front shocks are stock 1965 AC Delco shocks, the rears are from Koni. Since I started on my quest to improve my traction more racers, here locally anyway, are adding air pressure to their slicks. Worked for me and I hope the information can be of help to others.

Have fun and good racing.

Ron

__________________


Due to the current economic conditions...the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.

Meet you at the finish line.....don't be late!
  #9  
Old 04-15-2002, 09:23 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,646
Default

The last talk I heard by M/T at a race a few years ago was they recommend around 16-18 psi. for most of their slicks. The new radials usually like even more 22 or so.

My car , although a leaf spring rear picked up 60 ft and overall time by pulling my 90/10 front shocks and putting on my stiff oradrace vakved Bilsteins. opposite what most folks told me and one would think. So trial and error are what it takes.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #10  
Old 04-15-2002, 10:19 PM
Old Man Taylor's Avatar
Old Man Taylor Old Man Taylor is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Escondido, CA, USA
Posts: 6,944
Default

I used to run the same tire Ron does. M/T said to run it at 16 pounds hot. I ended up at 14.5 cold. I now run 29x11 Goodyear’s. They like 10.5 cold. I think they work better on my car than the M/T’s because they have a stiffer sidewall, which helps minimize the bunny hop. Whatever tire you run you would like to run the highest pressure you can and still maintain traction as it will present less rolling resistance. My car is set up a little different than Ron’s, so the results are a little different. My pinion angle is 2 degrees, but I have a 12 point roll cage to stiffen the chassis and I have a torsion bar in the back. Also I launch off of a trans brake. If you look at the launch on slow motion video it is absolutely brutal to the tire, and I don’t really have all that much horsepower or torque. Mine is just a 400.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017