#1  
Old 12-02-2022, 12:47 AM
jhein's Avatar
jhein jhein is online now
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Oregon
Posts: 971
Default Front suspension

With my IAII block and TKX, my car is sitting a little lower in the front. It's pretty mild. Doesn't look bad, but I really don't want or need the car any lower. I don't know if this is something I will want to pursue but if I did what's the best approach? Coilovers with adjustable height? I would not want to change the control arms.

__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Ray Klemm calibrated Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear

https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share
  #2  
Old 12-02-2022, 02:57 AM
Charlie Brengun's Avatar
Charlie Brengun Charlie Brengun is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 331
Default

My GTO is a little low up front and I didn't want to pour more money into it so I bought some aluminum spacers.

https://www.summitracing.com/search/...erial/aluminum

__________________
1968 - Pontiac GTO
The Following User Says Thank You to Charlie Brengun For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 12-02-2022, 10:15 AM
chuckies76ta's Avatar
chuckies76ta chuckies76ta is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,078
Default

I'm thinking the only way out for you is to change the front springs. Checkout Global west videos that Doug has posted on you-tube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHPosx2oStU He talks about cutting the spring coils if ride height is too high. I realize that is not you problem, but chances are if you put new springs in it could be an issue.
Only other way is spacers like mentioned. I'm not really a fan of them. Your in the same situation as us. We put an IA2 in our 68 Firebird and the front is too low. I decided to go with Global west upper an lower control arms with coil overs. Other little helper would be shocks with coil springs on the outside. Slows the bounce down. The one thing I find is when the front end gets heavier the springs don't do as good a job at controlling bounce at high speeds. Other nice thing about dual adjustable shocks is you can tune the front movement. There is lots more too this obviously but that's where suspension techs come in.

__________________
68 Firebird. IA2 block, 505 cu in, E-head, Solid roller 3650 weight. Reid TH400 4:11 gear. 29" slick.
Best so far 10.12@133 mph. 1.43 60 ft.
76 Trans am, TKX .81 o/d, 3.73 Moser rearend,
468 with KRE D-ports, Doug headers, 3" Exh.
The Following User Says Thank You to chuckies76ta For This Useful Post:
  #4  
Old 12-02-2022, 11:02 AM
JLMounce JLMounce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 3,679
Send a message via AIM to JLMounce
Default

I would opt for the spacers if you need to increase height, but otherwise like how the car rides and drives.

Coil overs are not really meant as ride adjusting options. You can adjust preload which does incrementally change vehicle height, but there's a very limited range that the coil-over has to be in to work properly. Otherwise you get bad ride quality and handling characteristics.

The quality units available from places like RideTech, Verishock and Viking are actually designed to place the car at or near stock ride height. Any lowering typically comes from changes to the spindle pin height, or a dropped mount lower control arm. This allows a longer shock which provides better ride quality by being able to run a lower rate spring.

__________________
-Jason
1969 Pontiac Firebird
The Following User Says Thank You to JLMounce For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 12-02-2022, 11:44 AM
jhein's Avatar
jhein jhein is online now
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Oregon
Posts: 971
Default

Spacers look like the way to go. Now I wish I had thought to measure the car before the swap. Oh well. Not a big deal.

Really, I actually don't mind the way it looks but the ground clearance is what bothers me. The combination of the heavier weight and the new Pypes exhaust which also hangs down a bit lower than the old system which I think was Gardner.

Anyway, thanks for the help.

__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Ray Klemm calibrated Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear

https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share
  #6  
Old 12-02-2022, 01:20 PM
AG's Avatar
AG AG is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: NH
Posts: 3,240
Default

There isn't much difference in total weight of an IA block with Ali heads than a stock block with iron heads. The iron IA blocks weigh about 47-50 lb more than a stock block, but that should be offset by the weight savings of an Ali head compared to a cast iron head.

__________________
1967 Firechicken, 499", Edl heads, 262/266@0.050" duration and 0.627"/0.643 lift SR cam, 3.90 gear, 28" tire, 3550#. 10.01@134.3 mph with a 1.45 60'. Still WAY under the rollbar rule.
  #7  
Old 12-02-2022, 01:49 PM
Scarebird's Avatar
Scarebird Scarebird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ABQ, USA
Posts: 4,998
Default

When I was a broke-ass college student my 69 Cutlass front sagged a bit: these are cheesy but will do the job until you have time to replace the coils. Mr. Gasket 1283


  #8  
Old 12-02-2022, 02:03 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,541
Default

https://www.globalwest.net/1703.html

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #9  
Old 12-02-2022, 02:13 PM
jhein's Avatar
jhein jhein is online now
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Oregon
Posts: 971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AG View Post
There isn't much difference in total weight of an IA block with Ali heads than a stock block with iron heads. The iron IA blocks weigh about 47-50 lb more than a stock block, but that should be offset by the weight savings of an Ali head compared to a cast iron head.
it's the whole package. I replaced more than just the block. I'm pretty sure the TKX weighs more than the M20, not sure how much. Also I have a Quicktime bellhousing and a Hayes billet flywheel that I'm pretty sure also weight more. When I put the car on the scale I have near my place, it weighed about 120 pounds more. The heads do help offset the weight some, but it's definitely sitting lower. I noticed it immediately when I saw the car on the ground. The spacers sound like a good place to start. Although, with more weight up front would a heavier rate spring be a good idea too?

__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Ray Klemm calibrated Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear

https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share
  #10  
Old 12-02-2022, 02:20 PM
JLMounce JLMounce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 3,679
Send a message via AIM to JLMounce
Default

at 120 lbs over the nose with factory rate springs, I would guestimate your car is sitting roughly 3/4 to a full inch lower than it was.

With the motion ratio of an F-body front suspension being nominally 2:1, a half inch spacer would lift the car between 3/4 to 1" from where it currently sits.

__________________
-Jason
1969 Pontiac Firebird
The Following User Says Thank You to JLMounce For This Useful Post:
  #11  
Old 12-02-2022, 03:34 PM
jhein's Avatar
jhein jhein is online now
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Oregon
Posts: 971
Default

Does anyone have a measurement of the height to the crest of the front fender flare on a stock 70 TA, along with their tire size??

__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Ray Klemm calibrated Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear

https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share
  #12  
Old 12-02-2022, 03:46 PM
R 70 Judge's Avatar
R 70 Judge R 70 Judge is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,691
Default

Unfortunately, the hybrid coilovers aren't an option unless you change your lower control arms. You'll need to but new springs. I will be using the hybrid coilovers with tubular uppers and lowers, but I'm not concerned with a stock appearance.

How are you liking the new powertrain? It has to be substantially faster than it was before. Any complaints with the TKX?

__________________
James
1970 Trans Am

Spotts Built 484" IA2, Highports, EFI Northwind
Terminator X sequential EFI fabrication and suspension by
https://www.funkhouserracecars.com/
  #13  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:02 PM
jhein's Avatar
jhein jhein is online now
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Oregon
Posts: 971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R 70 Judge View Post
Unfortunately, the hybrid coilovers aren't an option unless you change your lower control arms. You'll need to but new springs. I will be using the hybrid coilovers with tubular uppers and lowers, but I'm not concerned with a stock appearance.

How are you liking the new powertrain? It has to be substantially faster than it was before. Any complaints with the TKX?
Yeah the coilovers don't seem like a good option for me.

I only have about 200 miles on the new powertrain so I can't comment fully. But, the motor is silky smooth in the powerband. Feels very strong. no leaks. The Ray Klemm built qjet seems excellent so far. Starts right up. Great throttle response. The TKX is great. Shifts nice. Fairly quiet. The best thing is it gives e the equivalent of a 3.77 rear in 1st and a 2.68 in 5th. Which is just awesome.

I have a Dragy that I haven't used yet. We all know basically what a stock RA III does. Once driving season comes around, I'll get it out and do some runs to see what I have.

__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Ray Klemm calibrated Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear

https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share
The Following User Says Thank You to jhein For This Useful Post:
  #14  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:17 PM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,385
Default

Ride height info for 1970 F-body.....

Here are the dimensions from the AMA Specifications for a 1970 ride height. These are height dimensions from the rocker panel to the ground in two places. The forward point on the rocker panel is located 36.3 inches from the front wheel centerline and it is supposed to be 6.5 inches off the ground. The rear point is 16.1 inches from the rear wheel centerline and is supposed to be 5.5 inches off the ground.



.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE

Last edited by Steve C.; 12-02-2022 at 04:24 PM.
The Following User Says Thank You to Steve C. For This Useful Post:
  #15  
Old 12-02-2022, 06:22 PM
jhein's Avatar
jhein jhein is online now
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Oregon
Posts: 971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve C. View Post
Ride height info for 1970 F-body.....

Here are the dimensions from the AMA Specifications for a 1970 ride height. These are height dimensions from the rocker panel to the ground in two places. The forward point on the rocker panel is located 36.3 inches from the front wheel centerline and it is supposed to be 6.5 inches off the ground. The rear point is 16.1 inches from the rear wheel centerline and is supposed to be 5.5 inches off the ground.

.
Thanks for that. What does AMA stand for and where did you find that?

__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Ray Klemm calibrated Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear

https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share
  #16  
Old 12-02-2022, 08:53 PM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,385
Default

AMA/MVMA Specification forms were provided by all the U.S. manufacturers from 1955 to 1984. These multi-page forms were submitted each year for each model produced and included detailed technical information of every component that made up that specific car or truck. Forms typically were from 10-30 pages in length.

I got a copy of the AMA Specifications for my car through Pontiac Historic Services. I also got a copy of the original factory build sheet for my car under its VIN number.


Keep in mind that AMA information is supposed to be the factory ride height. Personally a original car to me were a little nose high in appearance.
.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE

Last edited by Steve C.; 12-02-2022 at 09:09 PM.
The Following User Says Thank You to Steve C. For This Useful Post:
  #17  
Old 12-02-2022, 09:07 PM
jhein's Avatar
jhein jhein is online now
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Oregon
Posts: 971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve C. View Post
AMA/MVMA Specification forms were provided by all the U.S. manufacturers from 1955 to 1984. These multi-page forms were submitted each year for each model produced and included detailed technical information of every component that made up that specific car or truck. Forms typically were from 10-30 pages in length.

I got a copy of the AMA Specifications for my car through Pontiac Historic Services. I also got a copy of the original factory build sheet for my car under its VIN number.

.
Very cool. Thanks!

__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Ray Klemm calibrated Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear

https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share
  #18  
Old 12-02-2022, 09:44 PM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,385
Default

If interested keep in mind with replacement front coil springs there are obviously different part numbers. Differences can vary for all 6 cylinders, 400 or 455 V-8, with or without air conditioning. Variables can be different wire diameter, load height, load, rate at load height and approximate free height.


.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE
  #19  
Old 12-02-2022, 11:35 PM
242177P's Avatar
242177P 242177P is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhein View Post
Thanks for that. What does AMA stand for and where did you find that?
Automobile Manufacturers Association (1934-1972)
Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association (1972-1992)
American Automobile Manufacturers Association (1992-1999)

Not sure if they ever did any good for the industry, they were the ones that banned factory sponsored racing back in 57.

The Following User Says Thank You to 242177P For This Useful Post:
  #20  
Old 12-03-2022, 10:41 AM
jhein's Avatar
jhein jhein is online now
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Oregon
Posts: 971
Default

This is a more expensive option but Eaton makes springs in various heights above and below stock.

https://www.eatondetroitspring.com/findmyvehicle/

__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Ray Klemm calibrated Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear

https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017