FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
[QUOTE=dhcarguy;6384264]
Quote:
Initial timing Degrees of Mech advance amount of vacuum advance and ported or non ported source? Total timing Also, I would not exceed .050" on head gasket swap as proper quench will be diminished. High CR can live on the street but tuning has to be right on Depending on your pistons a small D-shaped dish can be machined in to get you lower CR and maintain proper quench.
__________________
Carburetor building & modification services Servicing the Pontiac community over 20 years Last edited by shaker455; 11-02-2022 at 08:11 PM. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
All things being equal, if all is properly tuned why don't you switch to the proper cc heads. Aluminums would be nice.
__________________
" Is wearing a helmet illegal" Mike Kerr 1-29-09 |
The Following User Says Thank You to 4dblnkldude For This Useful Post: | ||
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Some guys unshroud the chambers to around 76 cc. Here is a thread you can look thru that talks about that. See post 24.
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...=839932&page=2 Combining that and going back with a bit thicker head .050” head gasket would drop the compression about a point. Keeping the quench in that .050” or less range would for sure be better. The newer heads have a different valve inclination angle,the valve reliefs don’t line up to a 389 piston. I think it would work with the cam that is in it, but valve clearance would be fairly tight with it zero decked. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The last time I did a compression test was July of 2020. Nothing is any different as far as how the car runs since then. this is with the engine cold. I will check it soon with the engine warm. July 2020 test: #1- 160 #5 - 155 #2- 165 #6- 150 #3- 155 #7- 150 #4- 150 #8- 150 |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay S For This Useful Post: | ||
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Agree with Jay, those numbers are low and shouldn't have any problem at all running on even a straight 91 octane diet.
Generally an engine doesn't start to get sensitive until you get up into the 180's or more. That's my experience anyway. When they get close to 200 I find they get super finicky and need a blend of race gas. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
We tried doing a 0.100 down deck to lower compression on a 455 in the late 80s to lower CR down to 10:1 . Ran good but had to have race gas or was a rattling fool!
__________________
Skip Fix 1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever! 1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand 1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project 2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4 1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project 1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
One of the 455's built for dad's car was .030 over and zero decked with a flat top piston. Ran a set of #12 heads that were milled quite a bit (.030 if I remember right) and I believe compression cam out around 12:1. It had tight quench with just the .038 head gasket. Ran a solid flat tappet cam from Ultradyne. Can't remember the specs off hand but it was healthy (in a box here somewhere) Anyway, that thing would pump 195-205 cold, had a bunch of cylinder pressure. But on the street I could get away with running 94 Sunoco pump gas. I'd just run the total timing down to 30-32 degrees. Alot of that was due to good quench, keeping engine temps in check, etc.....but I will admit it's not for everyone, it was a finicky engine and the tune had to be spot on. At the track we mixed a 1/2 tank of 110 race gas and I'd bump the timing up to about 34-36 degrees. It was a decent running combo. Did this to keep the street driving costs to a minimum because he did drive it on the street a bunch. Drove it for about 4-5 years like that and it survived fine. This was the engine that pushed me and my father to stick to strictly pump gas builds and learned that we didn't have to sacrifice power in doing so. As we tend to drive the cars more than race them, the whole mixing fuels thing just became way too much trouble and was getting more and more expensive. It's much easier, and more convenient, not to mention a hell of a lot cheaper, to just be able to roll into any gas station and fill the car and be on my way without worrying about how the engine will react or dinkering with the tune. Especially when towns are 100 miles apart in the middle of the desert. Not like I can carry that much fuel with me. These days many of us have learned how to build higher compression engines and run fine on pump gas with all kinds of tricks we didn't know 30 years ago. I now run an 11:1 iron headed engine as a daily driver on 91 octane pump gas and it loves 36-38 degrees of timing. Don't even have to band aid it. Last edited by Formulajones; 11-05-2022 at 10:34 AM. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Formulajones For This Useful Post: | ||
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Changing head gaskets will involve the cost of intake and exhaust gaskets. oil and filter and anti freeze plus the head gaskets which are pretty expensive themselves,Probably around $300 for 090's. So have you calculated the cost of extra race fuel opposed to the cost of redoing your top end, assuming the block and heads have the correct finish?
__________________
1979 Trans Am WS-6 .030 455 zero decked flat pistons 96 heads with SS valves 041 cam with Rhoads lifters 1.65 rockers RPM rods 800 Cliffs Q Jet on Holley Street Dominator ST-10 4 speed (3.42 first) w 2.73 rear gear __________________________________________________ _______________________________ 469th TFS Korat Thailand 1968-69 F-4E Muzzle 2 |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
Put the Butler gaskets on it and drive it another 10 years.
Cometics have had issues, at times, with a grove in the gasket (wrong spot) causing gasket water sealing issues. Otherwise they seem to be good gaskets in the .042" thickness. Tom V.
__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward. |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
I have the same rough combo in my '65 GTO on the 389 I built in 1981. It has about 50,000 miles on it. Forged flat top pistons, milled heads (about 11:1) cranking compression 175 all cylinders, #77 heads, Sig Erson cam with a lot of overlap and lift. I need to run race gas to keep out of detonation. Sounds like me, you simply have too much compression. You can: run race gas, disassemble and install dished pistons, or, install bigger chambered cylinder heads or 72 cc aluminum heads. Lots of people seem to think a bigger cam will get you out of detonation, but it will not. It will only change the rpm and load it detonates at.
__________________
Jeff |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
I did 91 octane pump gas 64 389 engine with flat tops, stock 716 heads, and log manifolds earlier this year. It would be great to know what the Erson cam is in the last 389 example.
My highest compression we have done is 12.2 on 91 octane with iron heads. Pontiac’s the highest is just over 11:1 in 91 with iron heads. Highest on 87 octane with iron heads is 10.5 SCR with 500+ cid’s. Most instances the those high compression pump gas car’s would be quicker with race gas and a different cam. If your content with how the engine runs, and don’t mind adding race gas like the Jeff “geeteeeohguy” , then leave it alone, no reason to change things. The term bigger cam is usually associated with more overlap, more overlap with a bigger cam will just “move” were the engine has spark knock. That last post was exactly right on that. With only 150 to 160 crank pressure, the engine may have a tuning issue. But it does not appear at 150-160 that the cylinder pressure needs to be spread out more and lower by using a different cam. As is, with the cam in it, lowering the compression, you would have to drop the cranking pressure down another 10 points to get down to 93 octane. Lowering the compression with thicker head gaskets is probably the worst option. The thicker head gasket fairs a little better than putting the piston down in the deck .100” like what Skip mentioned. But not a lot better, I am not totally sure what that is, my guess is the improvement is mostly because of a difference in turbulence. Steve25 really nailed some of the issues with this engine in post #9. Read #9 again, start by reading the plugs. The pumping numbers are really pretty low for as much compression the engine has. Dropping the compression will lower the pumping number more yet. That isn’t necessarily good with the cam in it. I attached events for the Lunati cam in it. It has a lot of seat timing, and as much overlap as a Melling SPC-8 (041) cam. It would pump similar compression also. But the SPC-8 opens the exhaust valve up 10* earlier. Those early 389s need help in that area to run well on pump gas. That is worth about 2 point in octane on this engine with the same compression. That would get it down to around 93 octane with no other changes and you should not have add race gas anymore. I am not suggesting that is what it needs, it is just a basic example. There are MUCH better cam solutions that that. The Lunati cam was a pretty poor pump gas cam pick with the 77 heads and 10+ compression. Last edited by Jay S; 11-06-2022 at 11:57 AM. |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It's a single pattern cam with a lobe center of 106, lift of .479, and overlap of 306/306 int. and ex and 235/235 @.050. Spec'd for power with 10:1 or higher CR, headers, and 750 CFM or more with power from about 2200--6400 RPM. At the time, I was planning on bracket racing the car, so I had the rods shoot peened and polished, the whole engine magnafluxed and balanced, heads milled, good valves and bronze guides, forged flat top pistons, etc. And it did (and does) run hard with tripower and tubing headers with a 4 speed and now, 3.36 gears. I am hesitant to 'tear down' a good running engine that I built at age 20 41 years ago for the sake of lowering the performance to run on pump gas. That said, I sure would like to drive the car more. I lowered the compression on the '67 I have and I drive the wheels off of it. Bolted a set of #15 455 heads on it and that totally fixed my issues.
__________________
Jeff |
The Following User Says Thank You to geeteeohguy For This Useful Post: | ||
#35
|
||||
|
||||
OK, I have learned a lot so far. So this winter I am going to try to get this much done:
-- find someone local to calibrate my distributor. --Take off my carbs. Rebuild and replace my jets with all .70"s --I will post pics of my plugs soon, and again when I get the rest done and run the car until up to temp. I won't replace the head gaskets for now. I will soon be 70 yrs old, so if doing this much helps , I'm stopping there. It is getting hard on me physically to work on my pride and JOY. Thank you for taking time to help, I REALLY do appreciate It. I will keep you all up to date., Dave |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
Dave, that is a solid plan. You may pull it off with a sharp tune. The timing and jetting may just be enough. Location matters, too. My cars detonate in dry, arid, hot central CA where they would not on the foggy coast. Humidity and temps play a part.
Messing around with the head gaskets is a zero-gain option. Don't do it. If you DO pull the heads, replace them with 72cc aluminum or 87-97cc iron GM parts. (aluminum can run a full compression point higher than iron on the same octane because it is less thermally efficient).
__________________
Jeff |
The Following User Says Thank You to geeteeohguy For This Useful Post: | ||
#37
|
||||
|
||||
[QUOTE=shaker455;6384278]
Quote:
Dave |
The Following User Says Thank You to dhcarguy For This Useful Post: | ||
#38
|
||||
|
||||
While it is essential to have the distributor mechanical / vacuum advance itself known and spot on, don’t overlook the number one piston to timing mark on the balancer to timing mark on the engine relationship. it needs to be spot on as well. An accurate known base timing is the corner stone for a correct timing curve / total timing.
__________________
“We don’t build a ‘luxury’ car. We build a performance car then we make it luxurious.” |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Did not forget about everyone's help. Wife and I had some sad family issues lately. I did not get to my car since I asked for help. Now it is getting very cold, but hopefully get to it soon.
Thanks again, Dave |
Reply |
|
|