#1  
Old 11-21-2022, 02:47 PM
GoreMaker GoreMaker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Georgia, VT
Posts: 291
Default Clearance issue between cam bolt and timing cover

I bought a cam bolt and washer from Precision Automotive a few months ago. Last month I installed it, confirmed that I had 0.006" of end play on the cam (it's a torrington bearing setup from BOP Engineering), and then shortly after that I installed the timing cover using a paper gasket and ultra blue RTV (because that's all I had on hand). Today I decided to re-seal it because the blue RTV bugged me and I finally had some black on hand. When I removed the timing cover, I noticed some aluminum shavings on the cam timing gear. So I checked the inside of the timing cover and found this:



I'm not sure what the issue is. It could be the cam bolt head being too tall, or the washer being too thick, or the timing cover being too shallow (I really doubt this last one). This is what the bolt and washer look like, fully torqued with the eccentric sitting flush on the timing gear and the tang engaged in its slot:





Anybody know what might be wrong here? I'm really glad I found this before trying to run the engine. There was no indication of any issue when I tried turning the engine over by hand.

  #2  
Old 11-21-2022, 03:30 PM
Verdoro 68's Avatar
Verdoro 68 Verdoro 68 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Clayton, CA
Posts: 2,806
Default

The stock cam bolt and washer sit below the fuel pump eccentric, so it looks like the bolt/washer combo you are using is too tall and rubbing against the timing cover.

I have a Simms torrington setup on my engine too, but it didn't come with that bolt/washer setup.

__________________
Ken
'68 GTO - Ram Air II 464 - 236/242 roller - 9.5” TSP converter - 3.55 posi (build thread | walk around)
'95 Comp T/A #6 M6 - bone stock (pics)
The Following User Says Thank You to Verdoro 68 For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 11-21-2022, 03:37 PM
GoreMaker GoreMaker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Georgia, VT
Posts: 291
Default

My timing set didn't come with a cam bolt or washer at all, those were purchased from a different source. I just checked the bolt/washer that I got from Butler, and the head of the bolt is MUCH shorter. Doesn't stick out past the eccentric at all. However the bolt is overall much shorter as well with maybe half as many threads going into the cam. The washer for both is the same thickness.

I'm thinking the head of the bolt provided by Precision Auto is just way too tall. I'll use the Butler bolt instead and hope there's enough threads. Luckily that bolt only gets tightened to 45 ft-lb anyways

  #4  
Old 11-21-2022, 03:53 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,541
Default

The stock washer is flat if using the fuel pump eccentric. There is an aftermarket washer that has a recess for the cam nose when you do not use the fuel pump eccentric. To me it looks like bolt head goes in a recess?

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Skip Fix For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 11-21-2022, 03:57 PM
GoreMaker GoreMaker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Georgia, VT
Posts: 291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip Fix View Post
The stock washer is flat if using the fuel pump eccentric. There is an aftermarket washer that has a recess for the cam nose when you do not use the fuel pump eccentric. Tome it looks like bolt head goes in a recess?
Yes, but taking into account the recess, the washer I got from Precision Auto has the same stacking height as the flat washer from Butler. The head of either bolt fits inside the recess. The washer definitely doesn't contribute to the extra height. It's all in the bolt head

  #6  
Old 11-21-2022, 04:01 PM
Verdoro 68's Avatar
Verdoro 68 Verdoro 68 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Clayton, CA
Posts: 2,806
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip Fix View Post
The stock washer is flat if using the fuel pump eccentric. There is an aftermarket washer that has a recess for the cam nose when you do not use the fuel pump eccentric. To me it looks like bolt head goes in a recess?
Good catch - it looks like that washer setup is for when the eccentric isn't used.

https://butlerperformance.com/i-3164...fuel-pump.html

__________________
Ken
'68 GTO - Ram Air II 464 - 236/242 roller - 9.5” TSP converter - 3.55 posi (build thread | walk around)
'95 Comp T/A #6 M6 - bone stock (pics)
The Following User Says Thank You to Verdoro 68 For This Useful Post:
  #7  
Old 11-21-2022, 04:12 PM
johnta1's Avatar
johnta1 johnta1 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: now sunny Florida!
Posts: 21,237
Default

If bolt is longer might check depth of cam hole and make sure bolt isn't bottoming?

Otherwise try grinding the bolt head down and see if you can still get a socket on it?


__________________
John Wallace - johnta1
Pontiac Power RULES !!!
www.wallaceracing.com

Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova
Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats

KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever!


"Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts."

"People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates
The Following User Says Thank You to johnta1 For This Useful Post:
  #8  
Old 11-21-2022, 04:36 PM
GoreMaker GoreMaker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Georgia, VT
Posts: 291
Default

You're right, the bolt is in fact intended for applications where the eccentric is eliminated. That's why the washer is so wide and has a recess. The washer itself isn't causing any issues though, and I definitely like it better than the standard one. It all seems to be working fine with the standard grade 8 bolt that I got from Butler, so all is well now.


  #9  
Old 11-21-2022, 04:41 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,541
Default

If you use it without the eccentric you flip it over. I have 2 motors with those because I am using an electric feul pump on them.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #10  
Old 11-21-2022, 04:47 PM
GoreMaker GoreMaker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Georgia, VT
Posts: 291
Default

Oh I see, so it goes over the cam snout much like the eccentric currently does. Live and learn!

  #11  
Old 11-21-2022, 05:45 PM
25stevem's Avatar
25stevem 25stevem is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,744
Default

I am glad you had to take it apart, because there does not look to be drop 1 of oil, on the timing chain, nor in the rollers which is even worse!

Am I correct in the way I am seeing that?

If so that chain needs to be removed and soaked in oil.

__________________
I do stuff for reasons.
The Following User Says Thank You to 25stevem For This Useful Post:
  #12  
Old 11-21-2022, 05:50 PM
GoreMaker GoreMaker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Georgia, VT
Posts: 291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 25stevem View Post
I am glad you had to take it apart, because there does not look to be drop 1 of oil, on the timing chain, nor in the rollers which is even worse!

Am I correct in the way I am seeing that?

If so that chain needs to be removed and soaked in oil.
It soaked in automatic transmission fluid overnight after I cleaned it in an ultrasonic parts washer, then it was coated in motor oil. It's as fully impregnated as it could possibly be. Just doesn't show up in pictures, I guess

  #13  
Old 12-06-2022, 11:14 AM
peters23 peters23 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: NH
Posts: 15
Default

Maybe a dumb question, but why would you *not* install the eccentric. I would think if you someday decide to go back to a mechanical pump that would make the changeover a lot easier.

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to peters23 For This Useful Post:
  #14  
Old 12-06-2022, 11:17 AM
GoreMaker GoreMaker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Georgia, VT
Posts: 291
Default

That's a really good point. I doubt the eccentric causes any kind of significant imbalance, especially since the cam turns at half speed. I have no idea why anyone would eliminate the eccentric, even if they don't plan to use it, unless they just didn't have one on hand

  #15  
Old 12-06-2022, 11:21 AM
GoreMaker GoreMaker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Georgia, VT
Posts: 291
Default

Incidentally, it's worth mentioning that Precision Automotive never replied to my email about this. Even if the issue was caused by my own misunderstanding, a reply would've been appropriate. I was willing to understand a late reply due to my email being sent shortly before Thanksgiving, but it's been over 3 weeks now. I'm not impressed.

  #16  
Old 12-06-2022, 11:29 AM
mgarblik mgarblik is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peters23 View Post
Maybe a dumb question, but why would you *not* install the eccentric. I would think if you someday decide to go back to a mechanical pump that would make the changeover a lot easier.
Some people like the "solid" attachment of the "Butler washer/cup" vs the factory set-up if they are not going to run a mechanical pump. The factory set-up can cause a light rattle noise without the fuel pump arm preload riding on the outer cup. Generally, not a deal breaker either way.

  #17  
Old 12-06-2022, 11:47 AM
Jim Moshier's Avatar
Jim Moshier Jim Moshier is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Acton, CA
Posts: 294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoreMaker View Post
Incidentally, it's worth mentioning that Precision Automotive never replied to my email about this. Even if the issue was caused by my own misunderstanding, a reply would've been appropriate. I was willing to understand a late reply due to my email being sent shortly before Thanksgiving, but it's been over 3 weeks now. I'm not impressed.
This is why I support, and purchase, buy from those who take the time to support the end user. You can always find it quicker or cheaper but there is a reason they maybe. I too would have expected at least an explanation or a you screwed up email.

Jim

__________________
Jim Moshier

1971 Grand Prix 462ci SD Performance 6x heads
1962 Catalina 389
1968 Firebird 400-455 I haven't decided

"If we ever forget that we're one nation under GOD, then we will be a nation gone under." - Ronald Reagan
  #18  
Old 12-06-2022, 01:53 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgarblik View Post
Some people like the "solid" attachment of the "Butler washer/cup" vs the factory set-up if they are not going to run a mechanical pump. The factory set-up can cause a light rattle noise without the fuel pump arm preload riding on the outer cup. Generally, not a deal breaker either way.
This!. I have one on my latest 455 in case I run a mechanical. 400 in the 81 is stockish so a mechanical but all my others use an electric pump.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017