Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2020, 02:31 PM
napster's Avatar
napster napster is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 729
Default Ram Air Series Cam from Butler

I'm having an engine built for my 1969 GTO. Decided to make it a ram air car.

I looked for some 722 heads to no avail and stumbled on to the RAII heads Pictured
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0526.jpg
Views:	369
Size:	82.6 KB
ID:	555534   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0527.jpg
Views:	389
Size:	85.7 KB
ID:	555535   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0528.jpg
Views:	406
Size:	73.3 KB
ID:	555536   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0519.jpg
Views:	396
Size:	92.8 KB
ID:	555537   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0522.jpg
Views:	433
Size:	66.6 KB
ID:	555538  



Last edited by napster; 12-06-2020 at 02:44 PM.
  #2  
Old 12-06-2020, 02:36 PM
napster's Avatar
napster napster is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 729
Default

While I was at it I came across the following new cam from Butler. Thought I would give a try.

Engine will be .60 over and with a 427 stroker kit will equal either 440 or just shy of 440 CID. Compression will be 9.9 and using RA IV exhaust manifolds.

Should be an interesting build.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1205201106.jpg
Views:	527
Size:	51.6 KB
ID:	555539   Click image for larger version

Name:	1205201106a.jpg
Views:	419
Size:	43.9 KB
ID:	555540  

  #3  
Old 10-13-2021, 09:46 AM
napster's Avatar
napster napster is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 729
Default

Thought I would revisit this thread since I found out that there will not be a 427 stroker kit bringing the total CID to close to 440 cubes. The stroker kit is for a 461 that will mostly come in at close to 468 cubes. Opinions on the RA II heads I posted before and the roller cam version from Butler that I posted. Good, Decent or bad?

Thanks,
Jim

  #4  
Old 12-06-2020, 02:56 PM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 6,357
Default

The intake/exhaust lift is opposite of what a RA II head generally likes. It will probably run better with a 1.65 rocker on the intake and a 1.5 on the exhaust... Seems like a cool build!

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
  #5  
Old 12-06-2020, 03:06 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

This is a flat tappet Hydraulic Camshaft? Like Factory?

Do not understand the HR at the end of the part number. (HR typically means Hydraulic Roller).

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #6  
Old 12-06-2020, 04:04 PM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 6,357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
This is a flat tappet Hydraulic Camshaft? Like Factory?

Do not understand the HR at the end of the part number. (HR typically means Hydraulic Roller).

Tom V.
Hi Tom, yes that is a hydraulic roller cam. Butler offers a "Ram Air" series of HR cams now.... As you know the Butlers are great with marketing.

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
  #7  
Old 12-06-2020, 07:06 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PAUL K View Post
Hi Tom, yes that is a hydraulic roller cam. Butler offers a "Ram Air" series of HR cams now.... As you know the Butlers are great with marketing.
Agree, David Butler has made good use of that Business Degree (over the years that he has run Butler Performance).

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
The Following User Says Thank You to Tom Vaught For This Useful Post:
  #8  
Old 12-07-2020, 01:34 AM
Brian Baker's Avatar
Brian Baker Brian Baker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Posts: 17,184
Default

Hydraulic roller version of the venerable 041 grind will run well with those heads and around 440 cubes.

__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut.
  #9  
Old 12-07-2020, 11:33 AM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Baker View Post
Hydraulic roller version of the venerable 041 grind will run well with those heads and around 440 cubes.
Kind of what I was thinking.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #10  
Old 10-13-2021, 11:04 AM
turbo69bird's Avatar
turbo69bird turbo69bird is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Baker View Post
Hydraulic roller version of the venerable 041 grind will run well with those heads and around 440 cubes.
On my old 428 w 722s and a RAIV intake I ran 550 lift solid version of the RAIV cam and it ran consistent 12.00
Muncie m20 and a 4.10 gear w a 28 inch tall tire .

Launched it fairly high but didn’t shift it particularly high Ram good and lasted a long time. Was a good combo.

__________________
Happiness is just a turbocharger away!
960 HP @ 11 psi, 9.70 at 146.
Iron heads, iron stock 2 bolt block , stock crank, 9 years haven't even changed a spark plug!
selling turbos and turbo related parts since 2005!
  #11  
Old 12-06-2020, 03:09 PM
grandam1979 grandam1979 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio, Findlay
Posts: 1,437
Default

I was assuming it’s a hydraulic roller from the card?

  #12  
Old 10-14-2021, 12:11 PM
DaleO's Avatar
DaleO DaleO is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Snohomish WA
Posts: 87
Default

Hi soupman. Would you mind sharing your cam's make and p/n?

  #13  
Old 10-14-2021, 07:09 PM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,432
Default

The cam in post number 20 is a Butler custom grind:

https://butlerperformance.com/i-2503...tegory:1272239

The Comp XE lobes used are 3315 and 3316. However they were probably ordered with a "B" suffix code after the lobe number. When ordered with that code the .050 duration will remain the same but often the the advertised duration can be different, typically by 1 or maybe 2 degrees. Similar situation with the lift.


.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE
  #14  
Old 12-06-2020, 03:13 PM
Formulas Formulas is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,668
Default

Would the extra exhaust lift come in handy with iron exhaust manifolds

__________________
A man who falls for everything stands for nothing.
  #15  
Old 12-06-2020, 04:00 PM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 6,357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulas View Post
Would the extra exhaust lift come in handy with iron exhaust manifolds
Probably not for a street type application. Eventually if the engine is spun high enough the added lift will help.

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
  #16  
Old 12-06-2020, 03:13 PM
grandam1979 grandam1979 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio, Findlay
Posts: 1,437
Default

Are the heads dated D228? If so production heads are a little more desirable than service heads. Looking at the picture both will be D228.

  #17  
Old 12-08-2020, 02:52 PM
napster's Avatar
napster napster is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 729
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grandam1979 View Post
Are the heads dated D228? If so production heads are a little more desirable than service heads. Looking at the picture both will be D228.
These are early heads without the 96 above the center ports. The 96 was added later to aid the assembly line workers. The first service replacement heads were dates in January, 1969.

Look at post #25 by The Boss in the link for the dates of production for the RA II heads.

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...04#post5256604

  #18  
Old 12-06-2020, 04:02 PM
STEELCITYFIREBIRD's Avatar
STEELCITYFIREBIRD STEELCITYFIREBIRD is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: "STEELER COUNTRY"
Posts: 2,950
Default

Took a look at their new cam offerings. Indeed a Hydro Roller. RA seems only a name!

https://butlerperformance.com/c-1234...by-butler.html


Last edited by STEELCITYFIREBIRD; 12-06-2020 at 05:01 PM.
  #19  
Old 12-07-2020, 08:25 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,001
Default

I end up building quite a few carburetors for engines done there or from folks who have bought parts there.

For quite a few years they pushed a LOT of XE cams and most of their custom stuff was ground on 110LSA's for quite a few years. The XE268, XE274 and XR 276 HR were high on the list.

It's probably been 3 or 4 years now if not longer, but after a phone conversation with them about an engine they were dyno tuning I sent them the cam card comparison below.


Things have changed quite a bit since then, if anyone is paying attention.......
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0223.jpg
Views:	468
Size:	57.1 KB
ID:	555562  

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #20  
Old 12-08-2020, 04:55 PM
sberbs's Avatar
sberbs sberbs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 48
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff R View Post
I end up building quite a few carburetors for engines done there or from folks who have bought parts there.

For quite a few years they pushed a LOT of XE cams and most of their custom stuff was ground on 110LSA's for quite a few years. The XE268, XE274 and XR 276 HR were high on the list.

It's probably been 3 or 4 years now if not longer, but after a phone conversation with them about an engine they were dyno tuning I sent them the cam card comparison below.


Things have changed quite a bit since then, if anyone is paying attention.......
So what was the custom grind stats?

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017