Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-06-2023, 10:51 AM
rare4k's Avatar
rare4k rare4k is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Annapolis MD.
Posts: 546
Default Ram Air carb

Thoughts on the stamp please !Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20231106_012117364.jpg
Views:	343
Size:	34.0 KB
ID:	622912Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20231106_012255212.jpg
Views:	273
Size:	50.5 KB
ID:	622913Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20231106_012156910_BURST002.jpg
Views:	268
Size:	39.1 KB
ID:	622914

Sent from my moto z4 using Tapatalk

  #2  
Old 11-06-2023, 06:35 PM
Kenth's Avatar
Kenth Kenth is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Kingdom of Sweden
Posts: 5,481
Default

Cast #7044620 in ring at back is used, among others, for 1969 7029270 SR units mfd in the 70īs, but SR units donīt have plant codes, and the secondary number stamped beneath fuel inlet is wrong for the 7029270 SR unit.
Iīd spell "Frankencarb" on this carburetor.

__________________
1966 GTO Tri-Power
1970 GTO TheJudge
http://www.poci.org/
http://gtoaa.org/
  #3  
Old 11-06-2023, 09:16 PM
rare4k's Avatar
rare4k rare4k is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Annapolis MD.
Posts: 546
Default

Why would you think this is a SR carb vs a dated original carb ?

Sent from my moto z4 using Tapatalk

  #4  
Old 11-06-2023, 10:21 PM
Baron Von Zeppelin Baron Von Zeppelin is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,467
Default

Looks to be a pretty obvious restamp to me - just by the stamping itself

It also wouldn't have the compensator plate on the back.
They are not machined for screw threads to mount that plate.

  #5  
Old 11-06-2023, 10:29 PM
Baron Von Zeppelin Baron Von Zeppelin is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rare4k View Post
Why would you think this is a SR carb vs a dated original carb ?
Kenth is saying the main body casting number is not correct for a production 9270 carb.
Yet it is trying to pass off as a production carb by using an assembly line pick code and a 69 date code.
Its a Frank

  #6  
Old 11-10-2023, 04:52 PM
unruhjonny's Avatar
unruhjonny unruhjonny is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 6,278
Default

to me, that first picture absolutely sinks it.

That is absolutely a restamp.

Second picture only confirmed it.

I have recorded that that particular fuel bowl casting number was used for SR 1969 Pontiac carbs.
A casting number is simply a part that had yet to be finished, I'd re-read Kenth's post, in my opinion that one is pure gold as far as you should be concerned.

I had been watching the selling prices of these, aren't '9270 SR carbs still fairly attainable?
If they are, I'd steer FAR away from the likes of this, and just keep an eye out for a nice SR unit.

__________________
1970 Formula 400
Carousel Red paint on Black standard interior
A no-engine, no-transmission, no-wheel option car.
Quite likely one of few '70 Muncie three speed Formula 400's left.


1991 Grand Am: 14.4 @ 93.7mph (DA corrected) (retired DD, stock appearing)
2009 Cobalt SS: 13.9 @ 103mph (current DD; makes something north of 300hp & 350ft/lbs)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:27 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017