FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
“It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.” Dr. Thomas Sowell |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Tom, I have seen a couple of online complaints about Scat’s quality control of late. Seems that they can’t manage to grind two journals the same size.
__________________
“It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.” Dr. Thomas Sowell |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
I've never expected any of that stuff to be spot on anyway and always have this stuff checked over.
Can't tell you how many times balanced assemblies still need balanced, or how many sets of brand new rods still had to be resized on the big end and the small ends needed honed for proper pin clearance. It's just the nature of these things anymore it seems. Been that way with Eagle stuff too as far back as 30 years ago that I can remember. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Formulajones For This Useful Post: | ||
#44
|
||||
|
||||
To take that a step further, even factory OEM cranks I've found to not be perfect.
Many of them aren't even at their factory advertised stroke and come up a pinch short. Most times that can be corrected when reground. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone that buys a import crank HAS to have them checked!I have been lucky with my SCAT cranks.The last import crank I used was a 3in 3 3/4 forged in my 383 301 stroker engine.Went to MARINE Crankshaft to have the thrust welded and nitrited.Went to Castio to be cut to BBC Js.I think that was a OHIO,I have used a few OHIOs and SCATs,never had to cut the mains.Tom
|
The Following User Says Thank You to tom s For This Useful Post: | ||
#46
|
|||
|
|||
A lot of factory stuff isn’t even close to being on stroke. I can’t tell you how many HiPo BBC cranks I have ground .020 under because they were so far out of stroke that .010 under was impossible. That is to be expected from OE stuff. What galls me is having to grind a brand new crank .020 under because of piss poor quality control from alleged “performance oriented” companies.
__________________
“It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.” Dr. Thomas Sowell |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
“It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.” Dr. Thomas Sowell |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Tom V.
__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Tom Vaught For This Useful Post: | ||
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Formulajones For This Useful Post: | ||
#50
|
|||
|
|||
I paid Crower to make me a billet crank and send it to Jim Butler seven years ago for my 461 build when Chinese cranks were flying off the shelf. I couldn’t stand the thought of a Chinese crank going in my GTO. That is my bucket list motor that I am so proud of. When you say nothing but a lightened bank account you are not counting for pride of ownership. That was one of the best wallet lightenings I have ever had. God bless Jim Butler, Crower, and Pontiac.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bob prichard For This Useful Post: | ||
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Until I bought Molnars, dead on. |
#52
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'm currently building two engines for a guy that feels the same way. He pony'd up extra dollars to use Crower rods in his 455 topped with SD heads and a Bathtub intake manifold. We are using SD rods in his original 421 rebuilt that's being topped off with 980 heads and a tri-power. |
The Following User Says Thank You to PAUL K For This Useful Post: | ||
#53
|
||||
|
||||
I believe in the old Jim Butler Days, Bruce Crower and his brother were still using USA
steel to build their Connecting Rods. As you said, the Eagles were some of the first Chinese Rods. But at the time, the Eagle QC was pretty good for the Chinese stuff. Mr Molnar used to be the Chief Engineer for Oliver Rods before he started his own company. Tom V. I personally have always used the Carrillo Rods. Maybe overkill for the HP level but I was hard on engines.
__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Tom Vaught For This Useful Post: | ||
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bob prichard For This Useful Post: | ||
#55
|
|||
|
|||
I have 16 NOS SD rods. I bought when nothing else available. Jim told me sell them. I've just kept them. What do I know! They are special because they are Pontiac, engineers design and mfg.
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
980s and a TRIPOWER?For shame!Tom
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tom s For This Useful Post: | ||
#57
|
||||
|
||||
Well first you have to figure out how to support 750 horsepower with a tri-power and then you'll realize they aren't that bad.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to PAUL K For This Useful Post: | ||
#58
|
||||
|
||||
I'd use them! Vendors need to push the products they sell. Super Duty rods were very good rods back in the day. Nothing has changed they are still good rods.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to PAUL K For This Useful Post: | ||
#59
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Last edited by 1157 motor head; 06-15-2022 at 11:59 AM. |
The Following User Says Thank You to 1157 motor head For This Useful Post: | ||
#60
|
||||
|
||||
I also have a set of 8 NOS, SD rods that have been tested to be sure they didn't come out of one of the substandard batches that didn't get proper heat treatments. Mine passed with flying colors, but the oval track engine they were slated to go in got waylaid by life, about 1982. Damn 40 years ago.....
Maybe some day I'll assemble it and run it on the street, I still have all the parts hanging around, along with dished pistons ands some heavily worked RA IV heads that are sitting since they were ported in the early 80s. Everything was balanced, and it just needs to be fitted and assembled. The crank was cut and it's just a cast Pontiac crankshaft, but way back then that was about all we had to choose from. No way I could ever buy a billet crank back then. My 428 in the 69 GP stock car in my signature pictures ran for 3 years with a cast crank, and cast reconditioned rods, and the old heavy TRW forged pistons hanging on them. I still have that running engine that I pulled out in 1981 sitting in storage. It would need a rebuild, but it held up to 3 years on an oval track, with weekly use. The old cast cranks are pretty tough when all the clearances are right, they seem to last under hard usage pretty well. Spun rod bearings is what trashed thousands of Pontiac engines back then. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Sirrotica For This Useful Post: | ||
Reply |
|
|