#1  
Old 09-17-2021, 01:16 PM
gobrdgo gobrdgo is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 618
Default Porting the Pontiac head and measuring swirl

Hi everybody. Has anyone measured swirl when it comes to porting d ports and at what point is too much swirl? Following Mr Hand’s book doing his combustion chamber mods I’ve picked up 1000 rpm swirl. So we’re at 4000 rpm swirl with a modified 4x chamber. We also flowed a set of 906 vortec sbc heads which I thought were supposed to be big swirl and only saw 2500 rpm. ( we flowed the sbc head to reverse engineer it). So I have a limited understanding of swirl that it’s good and too much can be bad. If anybody can shed more light on it I’d appreciate it. Have a great weekend.

  #2  
Old 09-17-2021, 03:22 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,294
Default

Key Point you want to be careful of is if the swirl is too high then the air and fuel mixture entering the chamber will separate out with the fuel impacting on the combustion chamber walls and a lean "hole in the fuel/air mixture.

You want a clean continuous flame front across the chamber from the spark plug ignition point. The combustion process IS NOT one event there are several stages to the combustion event. This is a pretty good video that explains this combustion process.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xL6x3sqH9QU

That being said, the link also has other videos that explain other engine processes happening.
The MIT Guys who taught at my employer's company (for the research guys mostly) had a similar
presentation but not a video at that time. This was years and years ago. I retired 5 years ago.

So Pay attention to what the engine is trying to tell you. Jim Hand did a fine job with his book and SF 110 small flow bench.
There is a lot more to the combustion event subject though. And there ARE some fine videos out there today.

Tom V.

ps I measured Swirl & Tumble and a lot of other things in my Research job.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tom Vaught For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 09-19-2021, 03:29 PM
Vengeance Race Engines's Avatar
Vengeance Race Engines Vengeance Race Engines is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 386
Default

Swirl, being a form of turbulence, is not in and of itself, a measurable way to make power. Best to focus on actual key areas that would need to be addressed for a given combination that do make a difference. Just my $.02.

  #4  
Old 09-19-2021, 04:17 PM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,457
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
Key Point.......... I retired 5 years ago.
............I measured Swirl & Tumble and a lot of other things in my Research job.
Has it been that long?...!!!

Let's assume PMD totally researched Intake/Runner/valve/chamber/piston Shapes and got the IDEAL design in the EARLY 60s. Just assume. Balanced mixture distro/HP/ acceleration/ and winning. Lets assume the optimal total Advance was 34 Degrees.

Later on, Closed Chamber went to open chamber, and boom: 34 degrees Total ADV was re-attained.

Fuels have changed, yet the optimal kernel chemisry remains a aero-mechanical effort.

Then any MIXTURE improvements (shapes/swirl/atomizations) would yield a leaner carb JET for best performance. Also the Total Advance would go down due to optimixed kernel chemistry.

I run 32 degrees for best results. Wonder if anybody has best results <32*.

__________________
12.24/111.6MPH/1.76 60'/28"/3.54:1/SP-TH400/469 R96A/236-244-112LC/1050&TorkerI//3850Lbs//15MPG/89oct

Sold 2003: 12.00/112MPH/1.61 60'/26"x3.31:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Q-Jet-Torker/3650Lbs//18MPG 94oct
Sold 1994: 11.00/123MPH/1.50 60'/29.5"x4.10:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Dual600s-Wenzler/3250Lbs//94oct

Last edited by Half-Inch Stud; 09-19-2021 at 04:20 PM. Reason: fulel changes
  #5  
Old 09-19-2021, 09:17 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,294
Default

Ken Sperry could give you real dates.
He sent me a GM Air Flow Manual many years ago and we discussed when GM
first started using flow benches.

He is involved with a company that puts on presentations.
https://www.technical-insights.com/E...VDs-EADVD1.htm

If you have a spare $300 maybe he can help you out HIS, on how airflow actually works and when GM Engineering had their first Flow Bench.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #6  
Old 09-19-2021, 09:39 PM
Dragncar Dragncar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Humbolt County California
Posts: 8,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gobrdgo View Post
Hi everybody. Has anyone measured swirl when it comes to porting d ports and at what point is too much swirl? Following Mr Hand’s book doing his combustion chamber mods I’ve picked up 1000 rpm swirl. So we’re at 4000 rpm swirl with a modified 4x chamber. We also flowed a set of 906 vortec sbc heads which I thought were supposed to be big swirl and only saw 2500 rpm. ( we flowed the sbc head to reverse engineer it). So I have a limited understanding of swirl that it’s good and too much can be bad. If anybody can shed more light on it I’d appreciate it. Have a great weekend.
Pontiac heads were ahead of their time in some ways. Fully machined chambers with all the little cuts in them were all about swirl and working well with low lift cam shafts as they were designed to have "right now" power in heavy cars.

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dragncar For This Useful Post:
  #7  
Old 09-20-2021, 06:32 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,633
Default

Pontiac was able to run the chamber shape that was first used in the D port heads in 68 right on up to 79 and yet meet emission standards while other car makers where having a hard time doing that!

That in itself says a lot!

Pontiacs leg up so to speak on everyone else is due to in no peticular order 1) big Intake valve to provide fat flow numbers at lifts under .400" due to the big curtain area and the 30 degree seat.

2) 14 degree valve inclination angle that keeps the fuel that does get in from slamming onto the cylinder walls and not getting burnt which lowers fuel mileage, increases emissions and less causing ware!

3) the chamber shape and the high level of low lift swirl it produces.

4) even though the 68 cast number 16 D port heads where still cast with the air injection bosses in the exh ports like the 67 heads, engineering found out by mid production that they where not needed to meet emissions in CAvand where happily deleted from the late year casting 16s!

This is yet another thumbs up to the 68 and up chamber shape.

I have yet to investigate if the changes they made so darn late in the game to the Intake port shape of the 5 series and 6 series heads was done for greater power level, or better emissions, or maybe some of both.

One things for sure this change did not hurt power levels!

The width and shape / arc of the short turn has a effect on the swirl rate as valve lifts rise from .400" on up, this is for certain!

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!

Last edited by steve25; 09-20-2021 at 07:09 AM.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to steve25 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017