Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-06-2004, 06:22 AM
"Guy
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 428
Send a message via MSN to
Default

Has anybody been using the Rhoads lifters? I know they sound like a solid below 3500rpm, but how would they work in a 400 with a medium cam? My cam is a single pattern 244@.050 duration/.501 lift with 1.52 rocker. I was going to change the rocker to a 1.6 or 1.65 to increase my lift/duration above 3500rpm with the Rhoads? What do think?
Thanks,
Guy

  #2  
Old 01-06-2004, 06:22 AM
"Guy
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 428
Send a message via MSN to
Default

Has anybody been using the Rhoads lifters? I know they sound like a solid below 3500rpm, but how would they work in a 400 with a medium cam? My cam is a single pattern 244@.050 duration/.501 lift with 1.52 rocker. I was going to change the rocker to a 1.6 or 1.65 to increase my lift/duration above 3500rpm with the Rhoads? What do think?
Thanks,
Guy

  #3  
Old 01-06-2004, 10:46 AM
Bermuda Blue Bermuda Blue is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 481
Default

your cam is pretty agressive. you would benefit greatly with the use of rhoads. i have run rhoads lifters with no problems for many miles. they work as advertised. apparently, an aggressive lobe ramp can make them very noisy but i have never been bothered by the slight noise they have made with the cam i use.

if you don't mind the ticking, i would use them based on your cam specs.

  #4  
Old 01-06-2004, 01:25 PM
Jack Blum's Avatar
Jack Blum Jack Blum is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Orange, CA USA
Posts: 583
Default

I have Rhoads in my 68 GTO 400 all stock except for a 69 Ram Aiv cam and Ram Air exhaust manifolds. They work great. It's very lumpy on idle when cold, but when it warms up the idle is smooth and I have plenty of vacuum.



TigerEFI.com (Classic Pontiac Fuel Injection)
Classic Pontiac EFI Forum
Jack@TigerEFI.com
68 GTO, 455 JBP EFI, 6 Speed Dual Overdrive
Motto: Build it for NASA and drive it like you stole it!

__________________


TigerEFI.com (Classic Pontiac Fuel Injection)
2004 GTO Company car, 1994 TA 25th Anv, 1971 Grand Safari Wagon, 1968 GTO EFI, 1968 GTO Stock, 1968 GTO Convertible in desperate need of restoration.



  #5  
Old 01-08-2004, 03:27 PM
bmpmdf bmpmdf is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pacific, Mo. USA
Posts: 1,449
Default

You will like them with that combo. Just follow their directions that come with them.

__________________
Have A Great Day
  #6  
Old 01-08-2004, 03:41 PM
"Guy
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 428
Send a message via MSN to
Default

should i go to bigger ratio rocker than the 1.5? If you go to carcafts events, look up 15 proven dyno combos and see my numbers now. It runs pretty good with the johnsons about 10 inches of vacuum just below a 1000rpm(alot of tuning). It's pretty punchy.
My thinking is I could gain at bottom and top. Also I'm bring the heads in to look at the base line flow(current). Maybe with heads ported and polished it will work better with 1.5 rocker/rhoads lifter
thanks for the replys!!!

  #7  
Old 01-08-2004, 04:13 PM
WDCreech's Avatar
WDCreech WDCreech is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Anchorage, Ak. USA
Posts: 2,558
Default

If you have D-port heads you would need to elongate the push rod slots to use 1.65 rockers and possibly even 1.6s. So, if you have them off to have them ported, I would have that done. If you put them on the flow bench, you may find that either the intake or the exhaust would need a different ratio rocker to give a better flow ratio between the two. Also, if you have the slots elongated, you can always try the higher ratio rocker!

Bill

__________________
Bill

64 GTO, tube chassis w/606" IA tall deck, PG & a pro geared Fab 9". 2750 lbs.
8.2550@164.17-1/4, 5.2901@131.97-1/8, 1.1981-60-ft. 8/10/08

  #8  
Old 01-09-2004, 06:04 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,000
Default

I use the Rhoad's lifters. I ran std lifters first, then switched them out after about 1000 miles. What I saw was improved vacuum at idle and slightly smoother off idle performance. Prior to the switch I was seeing 12" vacuum at 1000rpm, 7-8" at 750rpm and 6-7" at 700rpm in gear. The Rhoad's improved all the numbers by about 2" of vacuum. It runs pretty much the same from about 1500rpm up. At the track no difference at all. I also took the time to swap out a std set of lifters for Rhoad's lifters on a 500hp 455 street engine at KRE. The Rhoad's lifters ran exactly the same numbers as std lifters on back to back pulls. So we loose nothing by using them.....Cliff

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #9  
Old 01-09-2004, 06:28 AM
"Guy
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 428
Send a message via MSN to
Default

Thanks for your replys...
First off my car is a 4spd,3:55 gear/3:71ratio with current tire.
Cliff did you see I was the only Qjet of the bunch of the car craft 15 proven?
I saw your work/Qjet(barely)on Jim Hands wagon picture in the Carcraft feature. It look like you modified the top of the carb with air flow deflector of something??? How can I get hooked up with that set-up? Also I was thinking of using the 1968 ram air set-up for the air cleaner, does the HO set-up work better or the ram air set-up?
I plan on using the Rhoads this time around...I'm ccing everthing this weekend also checking my valve to piston clearance of the current combo.
I'll know alot more when this is done and base line head flow. Thanks again for your time here.

  #10  
Old 01-09-2004, 04:06 PM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,000
Default

Jim Hand did all of the work to the top of the carb. He made some air deflectors but I'm not sure what material was used? The carb that I sent to him for the Wagon is a late model Pontiac carb, 1978 if I remember correctly. It was recalibrated in all areas based on his Wagon's engine/drivetrain specifications. The castings were not touched in any way. I was interested in getting an idea of how the late model "smog" carbs ran, what better place to send one for testing! Anyhow, it worked well enough that I didn't get it back!!.....Cliff

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017