Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-22-2014, 03:39 PM
quick67bird's Avatar
quick67bird quick67bird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tri-Cities WA
Posts: 1,769
Default Maximum compression with a turbo

I have aluminum D port heads that I am wondering what the maximum compression can be ran on E-85. It is a street engine that will be raced once a while. Mainly a grudge/ who is faster type of car for my group of friends.

The heads are 72 cc 340 cfm version from KRE that have been reworked by SD Performance.

__________________
67 Firebird 467 cubic inches 7.71 @ 92 in the 1/8 and 11.69 @ 115 in the 1/4.
  #2  
Old 01-22-2014, 03:59 PM
bignate's Avatar
bignate bignate is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Reedsville, WI
Posts: 446
Default

I don't have any real world experience with it, but I have been researching a supercharged E-85 application I'd like to build someday.

Everything I have seen online about E-85 is that no one really knows its limit yet. I have seen a few references to guys running 10.5:1 and 15-20 or more lbs. of boost, without problems. Albeit these are LSX and Mustang applications that I've read about.

Another FYI, if nitrous is ever going to be thought about, it works with E-85 but it's not as potent as it is with gas. The E-85 already significantly cools the intake charge, so you lose that benefit of N2O.

Nate

__________________

1970 "Real" Judge RAIII 4-speed, Atoll Blue w/painted white top. Mild RAIV headed 400 motor in now.
The Following User Says Thank You to bignate For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 01-22-2014, 04:43 PM
quick67bird's Avatar
quick67bird quick67bird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tri-Cities WA
Posts: 1,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bignate View Post
I don't have any real world experience with it, but I have been researching a supercharged E-85 application I'd like to build someday.

Everything I have seen online about E-85 is that no one really knows its limit yet. I have seen a few references to guys running 10.5:1 and 15-20 or more lbs. of boost, without problems. Albeit these are LSX and Mustang applications that I've read about.

Another FYI, if nitrous is ever going to be thought about, it works with E-85 but it's not as potent as it is with gas. The E-85 already significantly cools the intake charge, so you lose that benefit of N2O.

Nate
I thought about nitrous and have a bigshot plate, but I am looking toward turbos for more consistent power.

__________________
67 Firebird 467 cubic inches 7.71 @ 92 in the 1/8 and 11.69 @ 115 in the 1/4.
  #4  
Old 01-22-2014, 05:08 PM
David Holmberg's Avatar
David Holmberg David Holmberg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Port Charlotte, Florida
Posts: 8,688
Send a message via AIM to David Holmberg
Default

I'll say the same thing I said on the Bullet, you need to be talking to Travis Quillen.

There are lots of pluses and minuses, depending on your goal and intended use.

The Following User Says Thank You to David Holmberg For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 01-22-2014, 05:42 PM
quick67bird's Avatar
quick67bird quick67bird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tri-Cities WA
Posts: 1,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Holmberg View Post
I'll say the same thing I said on the Bullet, you need to be talking to Travis Quillen.

There are lots of pluses and minuses, depending on your goal and intended use.
I definitely be talking to Travis. I don't want to waste his time till I have the resources to move forward.

__________________
67 Firebird 467 cubic inches 7.71 @ 92 in the 1/8 and 11.69 @ 115 in the 1/4.
  #6  
Old 01-22-2014, 05:56 PM
David Holmberg's Avatar
David Holmberg David Holmberg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Port Charlotte, Florida
Posts: 8,688
Send a message via AIM to David Holmberg
Default

The thought process has changed so much, very quickly.

If I even knew the right answer it would probably be wrong by the time you talk with Travis.

The Following User Says Thank You to David Holmberg For This Useful Post:
  #7  
Old 01-22-2014, 08:43 PM
quick67bird's Avatar
quick67bird quick67bird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tri-Cities WA
Posts: 1,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Holmberg View Post
The thought process has changed so much, very quickly.

If I even knew the right answer it would probably be wrong by the time you talk with Travis.
I have been seeing that the technology is changing quickly. I just don't want to bother him needlessly till I am ready.

__________________
67 Firebird 467 cubic inches 7.71 @ 92 in the 1/8 and 11.69 @ 115 in the 1/4.
  #8  
Old 01-22-2014, 08:48 PM
grandville455's Avatar
grandville455 grandville455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chippewa Falls,WI 54729
Posts: 10,839
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quick67bird View Post
I have aluminum D port heads that I am wondering what the maximum compression can be ran on E-85. It is a street engine that will be raced once a while. Mainly a grudge/ who is faster type of car for my group of friends.

The heads are 72 cc 340 cfm version from KRE that have been reworked by SD Performance.
I didn't know u could get 340 out of the KRE D ports?

__________________
Darby
74 Grandville 2Dr 455 c.i 4550#
2011 1.60 60 ft,7.33@94.55-11.502@117.74


2017, 74 firebird -3600 lbs (all bests) 1.33 60 ft, 6.314@108.39 9.950@134.32
M/T 275/60 ET SS Drag Radial

2023,(Pontiac 505) 1.27 60 ft, 5.97@112.86, 9.48@139.31.... 275/60 Radial Pro's
  #9  
Old 01-22-2014, 09:47 PM
ponjohn's Avatar
ponjohn ponjohn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 9,542
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grandville455 View Post
I didn't know u could get 340 out of the KRE D ports?
Yes from KRE.

The Following User Says Thank You to ponjohn For This Useful Post:
  #10  
Old 01-23-2014, 03:23 AM
quick67bird's Avatar
quick67bird quick67bird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tri-Cities WA
Posts: 1,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grandville455 View Post
I didn't know u could get 340 out of the KRE D ports?
They were the 340 cfm heads from KRE that I sent up to Dave and he reworked them a bit and picked up a little cfm in the low lift areas. I have my flow sheet posted in one of my posts.

__________________
67 Firebird 467 cubic inches 7.71 @ 92 in the 1/8 and 11.69 @ 115 in the 1/4.
  #11  
Old 01-28-2014, 04:44 PM
quick67bird's Avatar
quick67bird quick67bird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tri-Cities WA
Posts: 1,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grandville455 View Post
I didn't know u could get 340 out of the KRE D ports?
Here is my head flow Darby.

These are the flow numbers after SD ported them on Daves flowbench.
lift......Intake......Exhaust.....%
100....77.1..........62.6.........81.1
200....150.6.........114.6........76
300....204.9.........152.9........74.6
400....250...........177.9........71.1
500....288.2.........200.3........69.5
600....319.1.........226.6........71
700....336.8.........239.7........70.5

__________________
67 Firebird 467 cubic inches 7.71 @ 92 in the 1/8 and 11.69 @ 115 in the 1/4.
The Following User Says Thank You to quick67bird For This Useful Post:
  #12  
Old 01-28-2014, 04:46 PM
quick67bird's Avatar
quick67bird quick67bird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tri-Cities WA
Posts: 1,769
Default

I know that D port heads are not the best heads out there, but something in me would like to see how fast I can make my car with a lowly set of D ports.

__________________
67 Firebird 467 cubic inches 7.71 @ 92 in the 1/8 and 11.69 @ 115 in the 1/4.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to quick67bird For This Useful Post:
  #13  
Old 01-28-2014, 05:07 PM
johnta1's Avatar
johnta1 johnta1 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: now sunny Florida!
Posts: 21,293
Default

DPTTFMF!!!


__________________
John Wallace - johnta1
Pontiac Power RULES !!!
www.wallaceracing.com

Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova
Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats

KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever!


"Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts."

"People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates
The Following User Says Thank You to johnta1 For This Useful Post:
  #14  
Old 01-28-2014, 05:24 PM
quick67bird's Avatar
quick67bird quick67bird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tri-Cities WA
Posts: 1,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnta1 View Post
DPTTFMF!!!

The D ports don't get much love and I understand why. I know the exhaust is deficient when compared to the RA IV ports, but I have ran them for so long I guess they have a place in my heart.

__________________
67 Firebird 467 cubic inches 7.71 @ 92 in the 1/8 and 11.69 @ 115 in the 1/4.
  #15  
Old 01-31-2014, 08:07 AM
grandville455's Avatar
grandville455 grandville455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chippewa Falls,WI 54729
Posts: 10,839
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quick67bird View Post
Here is my head flow Darby.

These are the flow numbers after SD ported them on Daves flowbench.
lift......Intake......Exhaust.....%
100....77.1..........62.6.........81.1
200....150.6.........114.6........76
300....204.9.........152.9........74.6
400....250...........177.9........71.1
500....288.2.........200.3........69.5
600....319.1.........226.6........71
700....336.8.........239.7........70.5
Thanks, Do U know your runner cc now? Whats the port size?
I am guessing u will use a 1 7/8 header?

__________________
Darby
74 Grandville 2Dr 455 c.i 4550#
2011 1.60 60 ft,7.33@94.55-11.502@117.74


2017, 74 firebird -3600 lbs (all bests) 1.33 60 ft, 6.314@108.39 9.950@134.32
M/T 275/60 ET SS Drag Radial

2023,(Pontiac 505) 1.27 60 ft, 5.97@112.86, 9.48@139.31.... 275/60 Radial Pro's
  #16  
Old 01-31-2014, 09:43 AM
quick67bird's Avatar
quick67bird quick67bird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tri-Cities WA
Posts: 1,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grandville455 View Post
Thanks, Do U know your runner cc now? Whats the port size?
I am guessing u will use a 1 7/8 header?
I would have to look at my paperwork, but unfortunately the.information is at home in WA and I am working in ND. I will check when i get home in a week or so. I do have 1 7/8 headers from Maddog.

__________________
67 Firebird 467 cubic inches 7.71 @ 92 in the 1/8 and 11.69 @ 115 in the 1/4.
  #17  
Old 01-22-2014, 10:12 PM
BruceWilkie BruceWilkie is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 9,132
Default

Big Nate about summed it up... how much compression is determined by a bunch of factors... manifold air temp(compressor discharge temp) chamber layout, A/F ratio, cylinder to cylinder variations, possibly dynamic compression to some extent, probably more.

Lots of subject material over on Yellow Bullet in the turbo section.

The Following User Says Thank You to BruceWilkie For This Useful Post:
  #18  
Old 01-22-2014, 11:31 PM
cgeise's Avatar
cgeise cgeise is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ellensburg,WA
Posts: 2,938
Default

The higher the cr the smaller the tune window, I have heard of 11to1 with alcohol. with a turbo if you need more power -- add boost -- lol but id say e-85 and 10 to 1 with moderate boost should be fine

The Following User Says Thank You to cgeise For This Useful Post:
  #19  
Old 01-22-2014, 11:48 PM
rodneybutler's Avatar
rodneybutler rodneybutler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Leoma, TN
Posts: 54
Default

I agree with Curt. I did an LS RHS aluminum engine with single turbo for a H2 Hummer. 9:1 compression on E85. Made 1600 hp with a bunch of boost. Problem was the engine was lazy until the boost came on and then was uncontrollable. Now the customer wants less hp and more drivability. So I'm upping the compression for less boost. Funny how people think they want big power until they get it! Lol

The Following User Says Thank You to rodneybutler For This Useful Post:
  #20  
Old 01-22-2014, 11:51 PM
cgeise's Avatar
cgeise cgeise is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ellensburg,WA
Posts: 2,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rodneybutler View Post
I agree with Curt. I did an LS RHS aluminum engine with single turbo for a H2 Hummer. 9:1 compression on E85. Made 1600 hp with a bunch of boost. Problem was the engine was lazy until the boost came on and then was uncontrollable. Now the customer wants less hp and more drivability. So I'm upping the compression for less boost. Funny how people think they want big power until they get it! Lol
LOL ---- BEEN THERE DONE THAT

The Following User Says Thank You to cgeise For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:10 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017