FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Dude,
Buddy, pal I wasn't talking about you. I know you beat your cars up all the time. It was just a general question. It's like I said before I hear'em I just don't see'em. Of course I do limit myself to 500 miles. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
"Thanks for all your help. I guess that i will tear down the engine again and put in dished pistons. But also have any of you guys ever run a centrifical supercharger. Are they any better or worse than the other designs." And thank you for the questions. Try and stay around 8.5 to 8.75 if you have a centrifugal supercharger that can make 20 psi of boost with a good (320 cfm head). If you go to 8.0 you will lose about 75 hp over 8.75 comp ratio if you spin the blower at the same pressure ratio (boost). (Been there with Jimmy's engine). I personally make my living working for Ford as their Supercharger/Turbocharger Engineer so I think I can say that between that and some race team experiences with a couple of fast Ford guys I know something about centrifugal superchargers. I know a little bit about Turbos too. A centrifugal supercharger makes compression inside the compressor housing, flow goes up by the square of the rpm of the unit, and the basic unit is vastly lighter than most roots style units for the same airflow/pressure ratios. The biggest advantage of a roots style unit is boost at low rpm vs a centrifugal and turbo type supercharger which need rpm to function properly. The visual image of a roots style unit with twin carbs will impress most non racers. A turbo on the other hand for average power looks whimpy by comparison. There are issues with turbos on the street as you must create a complete package of parts: (camshaft, compression ratio, manifolds, plumbing (oil, water, air, and exhaust), along with matching the parts for the application. Much easier with a centrifugal supercharger, a bonnet, a properly calibrated carb, low compression ratio, basic camshaft, and a good fuel system. 600-800 hp fairly easy to come by. Making 2000 hp is possible with a pair of centrifugal superchargers but the fast turbo guys have done it with one turbo. Some people like Marty Palbykin have been involved with engines at close to 3000 hp in a couple of Tractor puller and Boat classes. Tom V. I have personally worked with only one Tractor puller guy and he was Canadian National Champion some 20 years ago. I think he never went any farther as Jim Brady's brother used to whip his a$$ most times. Francis Argenbright was National Champion several times.
__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Unless I de-tune for 10's the track officials have a habit of kicking me out So I spend the majority of my time cruising....I will give out useful info when I can. What about you George? What's your story?
The secret to happiness is not getting what you want but rather, wanting what you have.
__________________
The secret to happiness is not getting what you want but rather, wanting what you have. |
Reply |
|
|