Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-04-2017, 06:04 PM
Bruce Meyer's Avatar
Bruce Meyer Bruce Meyer is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,388
Thumbs down Mitey Mounts

I was changing the oil in my 69 GTO and noticed a scratch/gouge in my oil pan. Upon closer inspection it turned out to be the inner tie rod grease fitting was hitting the pan on hard left turns. Looking closer I noticed the pan was sitting on the crossmember. The mitey mounts that only have 2k miles on them collapsed. JUNK! I put some solid mounts on I had from my racing days. I do not notice any extra vibration with the solids. Don't waste you money on mitey mounts.

  #2  
Old 03-04-2017, 06:48 PM
grivera's Avatar
grivera grivera is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Just south of Baltimore
Posts: 4,914
Default

I have factory replacements in my bird and same, in less than 2k miles the pan was touching the crossmember. Is there a downside to the solid mounts?

__________________
Will Rivera

'69 Firebird 400/461, 290+ E D-Ports, HR 230/236, 4l80E, 8.5 Rear, 3.55 gears
'64 LeMans 400/461, #16 Heads, HR 230/236, TKO600, 9inch Rear, 3.89 gears
'69 LeMans Vert, 350, #47 heads: Non-running project
  #3  
Old 03-04-2017, 07:06 PM
JSPONT's Avatar
JSPONT JSPONT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: ROCKY POINT NY
Posts: 2,917
Default

Try the poly ones from Butler they worked well for me so far. Solid is ok too, just put a regular on the passenger side and a solid on the driver to keep vibration down. My .02

  #4  
Old 03-04-2017, 07:17 PM
Bruce Meyer's Avatar
Bruce Meyer Bruce Meyer is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grivera View Post
I have factory replacements in my bird and same, in less than 2k miles the pan was touching the crossmember. Is there a downside to the solid mounts?
I havnt noticed any downside to solid mounts. I used to run them when I raced. The car was street driven for thousands of miles on the street and around 1000 passes at the strip. Never a problem. I went with rubber mitey mounts this time around because I turned the car back to more of a stock type cruiser. I figured the car would be smoother w/rubber mounts. I cannot notice any difference at all between the solid and the rubber as far as vibration.

  #5  
Old 03-04-2017, 10:36 PM
FrankieT/A's Avatar
FrankieT/A FrankieT/A is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 2,556
Default

I put Mitey Mounts in my car and lasted 2 weeks. They suck canal water..!!!

__________________
1978 Black & Gold T/A [complete 70 Ram Air III (carb to pan) PQ and 12 bolt], fully loaded, deluxe, WS6, T-Top car - 1972 Formula 455HO Ram Air numbers matching Julep Green - 1971 T/A 455, 320 CFM Eheads, RP cam, Doug's headers, Fuel injection, TKX 5 Spd. 12 Bolt 3.73, 4 wheel disc. All A/C cars
  #6  
Old 03-04-2017, 11:47 PM
RocktimusPryme's Avatar
RocktimusPryme RocktimusPryme is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bedford, IN
Posts: 2,178
Default

There are quite a few guys who recommended a solid on the drivers side with a normal mount on the passenger to mitigate some of the possible vibration issues with solid mounts. Thats the route Im going. Fitment for the urethane units seemed to be mixed.

The other option is a turnbuckle or just a chain to limit movement on the driver side. But I have a phobia of using my expensive aluminum heads as a stop point with a turnbuckle bolted to one.

__________________
1967 Firebird 462 580hp/590ftlbs
1962 Pontiac Catalina Safari Swapped in Turd of an Olds 455
Owner/Creator Catfish Motorsports
https://www.youtube.com/@CatfishMotorsports
  #7  
Old 03-04-2017, 11:57 PM
Bruce Meyer's Avatar
Bruce Meyer Bruce Meyer is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RocktimusPryme View Post
There are quite a few guys who recommended a solid on the drivers side with a normal mount on the passenger to mitigate some of the possible vibration issues with solid mounts. Thats the route Im going. Fitment for the urethane units seemed to be mixed.

The other option is a turnbuckle or just a chain to limit movement on the driver side. But I have a phobia of using my expensive aluminum heads as a stop point with a turnbuckle bolted to one.
Putting a rubber one on passenger side might be a good idea when you could get decent motor mounts. The new ones are junk. You could collapse the pass side then your motor will sit cocked. I also heard of a lot of fitment issues with the urethane mounts including separation issues.

  #8  
Old 03-05-2017, 03:08 AM
RocktimusPryme's Avatar
RocktimusPryme RocktimusPryme is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bedford, IN
Posts: 2,178
Default

Well you can't buy single solid mounts that I'm aware. So I have a set of solid mounts. And a set of rubber mounts. I'm going to do one and one. If I quickly anihilate one? Then the other solid will go on.

__________________
1967 Firebird 462 580hp/590ftlbs
1962 Pontiac Catalina Safari Swapped in Turd of an Olds 455
Owner/Creator Catfish Motorsports
https://www.youtube.com/@CatfishMotorsports
  #9  
Old 03-05-2017, 08:48 AM
DevoBuzz's Avatar
DevoBuzz DevoBuzz is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 293
Default

I have the mitey mounts too. Will need to check their condition.

If I want to install solid mounts I will need the engine mounts only and the frame mounts can be reused? ?

__________________
1972 LeMans
461 stroker 10.3:1
Edelbrock D ports Scorpion 1.5 rockers
Comp Cams "Stump Puller" roller
Holley Ultra Street Avenger 770
Ram Air III exhaust manifolds
2.5" pipes Dynomax VT w/crossover
Edelbrock Performer RPM
TH350 2.78:1 10 bolt
  #10  
Old 03-05-2017, 09:47 AM
FrankieT/A's Avatar
FrankieT/A FrankieT/A is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 2,556
Default

Owning early and late 2nd gen F bodies, here's what I did. On my early; I use late style mounts. I split the clam shell and inserted the Chevy style aftermarket poly mounts(Energy Suspension). When I first did it they were rock hard and transmitted all vibration throughout the car. After driving the car a couple hundred miles the vibration was gone, l guess they broke in. Point is they're captive(No chains, cables turnbuckles ,etc. necessary). Being a T/A that's important since body work for me is a pita. So far about 30,000 miles and a bunch of NOS on 'em. No issues. I would think the same thing could be done for early A bodies. The bracket that bolts to the block has a different height between 75 and up "F" and big bodies so there could be some adjustment there for the application.

__________________
1978 Black & Gold T/A [complete 70 Ram Air III (carb to pan) PQ and 12 bolt], fully loaded, deluxe, WS6, T-Top car - 1972 Formula 455HO Ram Air numbers matching Julep Green - 1971 T/A 455, 320 CFM Eheads, RP cam, Doug's headers, Fuel injection, TKX 5 Spd. 12 Bolt 3.73, 4 wheel disc. All A/C cars
  #11  
Old 03-05-2017, 11:49 AM
JSPONT's Avatar
JSPONT JSPONT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: ROCKY POINT NY
Posts: 2,917
Default

I posted before the poly mounts are holding real well 700-800 h.p. They are higher in price but work great. I do have a strap too. They do not like a lot of heat, so I put an aluminum heat shield around them.
I also have a stick car so it is even harder on them. I broke 3 sets of mounts before I put these in. No vibration issue either.

  #12  
Old 03-05-2017, 11:56 AM
grivera's Avatar
grivera grivera is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Just south of Baltimore
Posts: 4,914
Default

Are solid mounts and poly mounts the same thickness as factory mounts?

__________________
Will Rivera

'69 Firebird 400/461, 290+ E D-Ports, HR 230/236, 4l80E, 8.5 Rear, 3.55 gears
'64 LeMans 400/461, #16 Heads, HR 230/236, TKO600, 9inch Rear, 3.89 gears
'69 LeMans Vert, 350, #47 heads: Non-running project
  #13  
Old 03-05-2017, 12:15 PM
1968GTO421's Avatar
1968GTO421 1968GTO421 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Travelers Rest, SC
Posts: 1,286
Default

Does the infamous sagging crossmember problem enter into this equation at all?

Thanks!

__________________


"No replacement for displacement!"

GTOAA--https://www.gtoaa.org/
  #14  
Old 03-05-2017, 01:30 PM
RocktimusPryme's Avatar
RocktimusPryme RocktimusPryme is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bedford, IN
Posts: 2,178
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grivera View Post
Are solid mounts and poly mounts the same thickness as factory mounts?
When I bought my solid mounts from butler, knowing I was going to be using one factory style mount on the passenger side I asked that question. The response I got was

"They are as close to factory height as a solid mount can be"

Not sure exactly what that means. I assumed it meant they made them factory height but may not be exact with the various heights of factory repro mounts out there now.

__________________
1967 Firebird 462 580hp/590ftlbs
1962 Pontiac Catalina Safari Swapped in Turd of an Olds 455
Owner/Creator Catfish Motorsports
https://www.youtube.com/@CatfishMotorsports
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017