#1  
Old 10-10-2021, 11:41 AM
sjdiesel's Avatar
sjdiesel sjdiesel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 183
Default Considering a winter engine upgrade

Considering an engine upgrade this winter. My goal is pretty simple, more power LOL. Nothing wrong with my current setup, I’d just like more as usual .
I’d like to get your opinion on the following upgrades. I think I have narrowed it down to two choices. One is fairly inexpensive and the other is a bit more.

Option #1:
Swap out my current ported 670 heads for a set of ported KRE d-ports (310-325cfm). I plan to buy them from KRE bare & ported and have Paul Carter put them together. Keep my current cam (Lunati Voodoo HR 239°/243° @ .050", ground on a 112° LSA), keep my current rockers, keep my Torker 2 intake and keep my RA manifolds.
At a minimum I would need to purchase the following: heads, ARP head bolts and gaskets.
This is by far the least expensive option. I have been told by some reputable Pontiac engine builder that this should net me around 560hp/600tq.

Option #2:
Swap out my current ported 670 heads for KRE High Ports, unported, North wind intake and change out the cam for a Lunati Voodoo HR 243/251 @ .050, ground on a 112 LSA.
At a minimum, this upgrade would require purchasing the following: Heads, intake, cam, push rods, roller rockers, head studs, headers and gaskets.
This is my most expensive option but I have been told that this would “easily” make 600hp / 600+tq. I have also been reading about the High Ports and found I will need to make or buy and different bracket for my AC compressor since those heads are missing a hole. Not real thrilled about this. I don’t want this upgrade snowball….

Curious what you guys think. If it was your money what would you do?
Would love to hear form those that went from ported iron heads to ported aluminum and their experience.

__________________
Sean
1967 GTO
Koerner built 468 with Edelbrock RP’s 315cfm by Butler, Luanti Voodoo HR 20510713, 4l80e, Holley Terminator EFI
  #2  
Old 10-10-2021, 11:54 AM
b-man's Avatar
b-man b-man is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 16,411
Default

What you’re thinking of doing in option #1 looks like a decent plan.

However some headers would be the key to the additional power you’re seeking no matter which upgrade you decide to go with.

__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42
1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56
2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23
  #3  
Old 10-10-2021, 12:16 PM
sjdiesel's Avatar
sjdiesel sjdiesel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b-man View Post
What you’re thinking of doing in option #1 looks like a decent plan.

However some headers would be the key to the additional power you’re seeking no matter which upgrade you decide to go with.
Yea that’s what I was thinking too. We did a back to back dyno test on my engine and the RA manifolds actually made more HP than headers. But I was thinking with the head upgrade having headers would only help.

__________________
Sean
1967 GTO
Koerner built 468 with Edelbrock RP’s 315cfm by Butler, Luanti Voodoo HR 20510713, 4l80e, Holley Terminator EFI
  #4  
Old 10-10-2021, 12:18 PM
ta man ta man is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Clinton,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 5,348
Default

My experience swapping from ported iron heads and a hft cam to a well setup ported aluminum head/ hyd roller cam package was literally a mind and a tire exploding experience.
Your first option is probably the best idea..but ditch the exhaust manifolds. The only thing i would change is possibly the cam? I don't know the exact specs of your cam..but to truly utilize the added flow of the new heads..you will want to have a high gross valve lift. In the .650 range or higher. The torker 2 will get the job done but it will need some plenum and runner work.

__________________

466 Mike Voycey shortblock, 310cfm SD KRE heads, SD "OF 2.0 cam", torker 2
373 gears 3200 Continental Convertor
best et 10.679/127.5/1.533 60ft
308 gears best et 10.76/125.64/1.5471
  #5  
Old 10-10-2021, 12:20 PM
ID67goat's Avatar
ID67goat ID67goat is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 411
Default

I think I would also go with option 1 but add headers and more cam to reach the power numbers you want.

The problem with option 2, other than what you mentioned already, is that while the Northwind is a good intake, it does not fit very well under a 67 hood unless you modify it by getting the carb flange angle milled etc. If you don't, the carb and air filter are angled up towards the front of the car and interfere with the hood unless you run a small air filter.

  #6  
Old 10-10-2021, 12:22 PM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,634
Default

Two things are a fly in the ointment here!

First off running even stock KRE heads puts you right at the threshold air flow wise of what that T2 intake can flow, no less if the heads are reworked to flow upwards of 290 cfm!
I can’t think of a greater waste of money!

The next issue in regards to your first and second build choice is the exh manifolds your running.
Getting to the 600 hp level will be tuff without running the optional big size exh manifolds and a 3” exh system if your not there already, and forget right now about making good use of high port heads and topping the 600 hp mark by much while even running the big size exh manifolds, you will need headers!

I have spent a whole bunch of time heavily reworking a T2 intake( no welding But epoxy) and 285 cfm up from the stock 260 or so was it , and it needed a 1.5” spacer to really work right besides!

Where talking RA4 port size or better all the way to within 2” of the start of the transition to the plenum and then even more of a expansion rate kicking in and then that getting blended into a 2” spacer.

You did not post what your running for a carb, but with the high ports something more like a 950 is needed.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!

Last edited by steve25; 10-10-2021 at 12:35 PM.
  #7  
Old 10-10-2021, 12:27 PM
ta man ta man is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Clinton,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 5,348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve25 View Post
Two things are a fly in the ointment here!

First off running even stock KRE heads puts you right at the threshold air flow wise of what that T2 intake can flow, no less if the heads are reworked to flow upwards of 290 cfm!
I can’t think of a greater waste of money!

The next issue in regards to your first and second build choice is the exh manifolds your running.
Getting to the 600 hp level will be tuff without running the optional big size exh manifolds and a 3” exh system if your not there already, and forget right now about making good use of high port heads and topping the 600 hp mark by much while even running the big size exh manifolds, you will need headers!
It is pushing it with the Torker 2 but it can support 600hp with some plenum and runner work and a one inch carb spacer.

__________________

466 Mike Voycey shortblock, 310cfm SD KRE heads, SD "OF 2.0 cam", torker 2
373 gears 3200 Continental Convertor
best et 10.679/127.5/1.533 60ft
308 gears best et 10.76/125.64/1.5471
  #8  
Old 10-10-2021, 12:39 PM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,634
Default

Yup!
That’s why I mentioned compression needs to be factored in if keeping the ductile iron on the exh side.
You’ll need more cylinder pressure to drive the exh out!

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #9  
Old 10-10-2021, 12:53 PM
sjdiesel's Avatar
sjdiesel sjdiesel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 183
Default

Good stuff guys!
I forgot to mention that with running the Torker 2 intake I would pay Paul port match it to the heads.
If not the Torker 2, what intake would you recommend?

__________________
Sean
1967 GTO
Koerner built 468 with Edelbrock RP’s 315cfm by Butler, Luanti Voodoo HR 20510713, 4l80e, Holley Terminator EFI
  #10  
Old 10-10-2021, 01:34 PM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,634
Default

while a port match will help, if will not get you out of the woods and back to your cabin, at least in terms of running the high port heads.

If every runner in that intake was reworked to flow 275 cfm you would be at the 565 hp level assuming no restrictions on the exh side.
290 cfm would allow 75 hp per cylinder, or 596 hp.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #11  
Old 10-10-2021, 03:34 PM
ponjohn's Avatar
ponjohn ponjohn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 9,530
Default

How much power are you making now?

KRE just dyno'd a 461 with as cast heads, RPM and 60919 and it made 498 hp at 5000 rpm.

  #12  
Old 10-10-2021, 04:07 PM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,634
Default

It took a sold 245 intake cfm to make that 498 hp and I likely would not be wrong by saying that it was tested thru headers also.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #13  
Old 10-10-2021, 04:58 PM
sjdiesel's Avatar
sjdiesel sjdiesel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponjohn View Post
How much power are you making now?

KRE just dyno'd a 461 with as cast heads, RPM and 60919 and it made 498 hp at 5000 rpm.
Mine made 520hp/580tq

__________________
Sean
1967 GTO
Koerner built 468 with Edelbrock RP’s 315cfm by Butler, Luanti Voodoo HR 20510713, 4l80e, Holley Terminator EFI
  #14  
Old 10-10-2021, 05:05 PM
ta man ta man is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Clinton,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 5,348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjdiesel View Post
Mine made 520hp/580tq
SD ported iron heads?

__________________

466 Mike Voycey shortblock, 310cfm SD KRE heads, SD "OF 2.0 cam", torker 2
373 gears 3200 Continental Convertor
best et 10.679/127.5/1.533 60ft
308 gears best et 10.76/125.64/1.5471
  #15  
Old 10-10-2021, 05:39 PM
sjdiesel's Avatar
sjdiesel sjdiesel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ta man View Post
SD ported iron heads?
Yessir

__________________
Sean
1967 GTO
Koerner built 468 with Edelbrock RP’s 315cfm by Butler, Luanti Voodoo HR 20510713, 4l80e, Holley Terminator EFI
  #16  
Old 10-10-2021, 05:46 PM
Dragncar Dragncar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Humbolt County California
Posts: 8,284
Default

Option # 3, Instead of the High Port option run some of the new CNC chamber (same as High Port) Edelbrock heads with mild-medium port job.
First, your intake will not be raised up 3/4". Gives you more intake/spacer choices.
IMO the advantage High Ports have over good E heads is for a very narrow engine choice. More max effort deals.
Builds like you are planning E head wins. Some headaches are gone. You could run a Victor if you wanted with E heads. No need for KREs High Port crossover if you plan on running a thermostat. That is, if you want your cooling system to run like PMD intended.
I do not see any reason to raise your carb up for what you are doing.
BUT, you would have to wait for E heads to be back in stock.
This is what the bolt holes on the end of the head looks like if it will help your A/C bracket.

First one is 72cc head, 2nd is 87 cc head. Looks like they will be in stock November.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2021-10-10 at 14-49-11 RPM CNC Pontiac Cylinder Head 72cc.png
Views:	78
Size:	123.1 KB
ID:	574815   Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2021-10-10 at 14-26-36 RPM CNC Pontiac Cylinder Head 87cc Hydraulic Roller Camshaft.png
Views:	79
Size:	133.6 KB
ID:	574816  


Last edited by Dragncar; 10-10-2021 at 05:53 PM.
  #17  
Old 10-10-2021, 06:04 PM
Steve C. Steve C. is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,385
Default

More tid bits to consider...

It is my understanding the as cast (no port work) High Port heads have about a 277cc intake runner volume. Also the High Port head uses a large 2.200" intake valve at a taller 2.000" installed height, thus a longer valve stem length at around 6.200". That is something to consider when evaluating the spring pressure to control the valvetrain mass involved.

Regarding the Torker II intake. Ken Crocie used one on a 535 cid combo that made 650 Hp. Nothing elaborate other than necessary TIG-welding above the ports, which needed to be machined flat and then port-matched to the tall cylinder head ports in use..


.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE

Last edited by Steve C.; 10-10-2021 at 06:13 PM.
  #18  
Old 10-10-2021, 06:05 PM
sjdiesel's Avatar
sjdiesel sjdiesel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 183
Default

Interesting option 3. I like that. Where are you getting this info? Edelbrocks website?

__________________
Sean
1967 GTO
Koerner built 468 with Edelbrock RP’s 315cfm by Butler, Luanti Voodoo HR 20510713, 4l80e, Holley Terminator EFI
  #19  
Old 10-10-2021, 06:22 PM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,634
Default

Don’t the high ports have a issue with stock brake booster clearance?

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #20  
Old 10-10-2021, 08:18 PM
sjdiesel's Avatar
sjdiesel sjdiesel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragncar View Post
Option # 3, Instead of the High Port option run some of the new CNC chamber (same as High Port) Edelbrock heads with mild-medium port job.
First, your intake will not be raised up 3/4". Gives you more intake/spacer choices.
IMO the advantage High Ports have over good E heads is for a very narrow engine choice. More max effort deals.
Builds like you are planning E head wins. Some headaches are gone. You could run a Victor if you wanted with E heads. No need for KREs High Port crossover if you plan on running a thermostat. That is, if you want your cooling system to run like PMD intended.
I do not see any reason to raise your carb up for what you are doing.
BUT, you would have to wait for E heads to be back in stock.
This is what the bolt holes on the end of the head looks like if it will help your A/C bracket.

First one is 72cc head, 2nd is 87 cc head. Looks like they will be in stock November.
Are you suggesting The new CNC chamber in round or D port?

__________________
Sean
1967 GTO
Koerner built 468 with Edelbrock RP’s 315cfm by Butler, Luanti Voodoo HR 20510713, 4l80e, Holley Terminator EFI
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017