FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
That's just my luck finally got my new heads and now this.How can I explain this to my wife ( Honey these new heads are really,,,bahhhhha....
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Polar, That is one, but not the only, reason that I don't have a wife!
__________________
Bill 64 GTO, tube chassis w/606" IA tall deck, PG & a pro geared Fab 9". 2750 lbs. 8.2550@164.17-1/4, 5.2901@131.97-1/8, 1.1981-60-ft. 8/10/08 |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
I'm wondering when is a Pontiac no longer a Pontiac. Don't get me wrong about this, I'm not casting my vote one way or the other right now, in fact I was a little excited at first. But then I started thinking, with the intake totally different, convertible exhaust, put them on an IA block, you can even get timing covers that utilize a sb Chevy water pump. How will anyone recognize it as a Pontiac? Just curious about other opinions on this.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9eWgLd0q-U |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Ditto!
__________________
Derek B. Current best: 11.97@110 1.65-60' !!! '74 ventura, (Fired july 14/06) '74 462 4-bolt (9.5-1), SCAT, Ross, T-II w/850DP (shaker455), TH350, Conti 10'' 3800, Supercomps, Magnaflow, 3'' Pypes, 3.73's, 28x13.5-15 ET streets. 1970 Beismeyer 17' flatbottom vdrive, 11.8:1 455P, ported heads, dual Qjet tunnel ram. |
#45
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
James 1970 Trans Am Spotts Built 484" IA2, Highports, EFI Northwind Terminator X sequential EFI fabrication and suspension by https://www.funkhouserracecars.com/ |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Polar, That is one, but not the only, reason that I don't have a wife!
The other reason is you live in alaska and the only pussy there is attached to a polar bear Rex
__________________
http://home.adelphia.net/~fbnr/1968firebird.html |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Still, anyone tooling up new parts for pontiacs is a cool deal in my book. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Sounds Like the Heads P-Dude is waiting on.....time to cash in that IRA ?
Quote:
__________________
1972 T/A 455 TH400 (sold) Formerly..... Dreambird72 |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
There is no way a real Pontiac engine will ever be built NEW again. If the new tech pieces can run quicker all out against the rest of the brands, people will start running Pontiac instead? Maybe? These aren't street 500 hp heads. No way an aftermarket piece can be a true Pontiac anyway.Not sure why there would be an arguement if the goal is all out performance. I am in awe at the available parts in the last 5 years. Pontimetamorphi !!
__________________
68 Firebird Are you running with the wind or breaking it? |
#50
|
||||
|
||||
Ron, I don't think there's an arguement here, at least not from me. I just wanted other opinions on this. I'm glad there is so much interest in the aftermarket for performance parts for Pontiac. I'm just wondering at what point has it been redesigned so much that it's hard to call it a Pontiac. Again, I'm just thinking out loud. You might even see a set on my car someday.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9eWgLd0q-U |
#51
|
||||
|
||||
Quote"
"That is one of the things that has always turned me off of the hemi head deal for pontiacs. Now a nice set of RA-V heads using current technology would appeal to me (and I know there has been some talk/movement of some kind on this deal by lynn)." The Ram Air V is a stolen design from the Ford Tunnel Port engine, plain and simple. Ask Anyone. Why would this "Ford" head on a Pontiac be ANY different from the other FORD head (Ram Air V)? Personally I would like to see it built. Tom V.
__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward. |
#52
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
um, tom, yates heads are STILL very good.
3 years ago we made almost 900hp naturally aspirated on a 392 inch motor doing less then 8k rpm....
__________________
is this thing on? |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
Here's what you do; get a chevy chassised race car, put these new Pontiac more or less styled engine combo's in it, modify a Pontiac timing cover to go over the belt drive such as Ray Cox did, then make sure you parade with the hood off thru the pits at the next drag race. When you spank the chevy guys, they will be wanting to know what is THAT engine!?! It helps to have the saying on your back glass that says; Pontiac powered because chevy engines are too slow. Make sure the large Pontiac emblem is visible.
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
Tom V., You are correct on the Tunnel port heads. And having built serveral Yates headed small block Fords, I can say that a traditional sbc can't compete. That's why the sb2.2 and sb2.5 's were designed. They are basicly nothing more than current Pro Stock heads down sized for the bore spacing of the race only sbc.
BTW, For those questioning where does it stop being Pontiac, look at how long the competition hasn't been remotely close to production style engines, but look what they call them anyway. |
#56
|
||||
|
||||
If you like running close to Pure Pontiacs run NHRA stock or Super Stock with OEM castings. Of course that is probably changing too. It is called PROGRESS gentlemen. Otherwise we are all nostalgia racers!
Tom V. So, Ford had the V-8's in the Duece Coupes! I suppose we all stole that too, but then Ford stole and is still using the revolutionary stamped steel rocker a patent from Pontiac Motors, and the OHV V-8 which was originally mass produced in the 1949 Olds and subsequently switched by Pontiac with the StratoStreak engine in 1955. Other divisions leaped onto the success of the OHV V-8 too. My father had one and he says all the Ford guys couldnt touch him. In fact, the rocket V-8 was also the Indy pace for 1949. It was way fast in its day and way cool. Let's just say, they all stole from each other. I always like to say we let Ford do the prototype work, then Pontiac added a few improvements. This head looks very nice and has some very nice features. It looks essentially like a Cleveland head with the valve order swapped on 4, 8, 3, and 7. The intake ports are moved away from siameze location like the Cleveland which is a novel approach. Improves CSA, but sacrifices, homgenious runner length. I think this a good move. It will be interesting to see how engine builders tune those runner lengths. Way better than choke to deal with on larger cubic inch engines. I can also see some additional material added to the bottom of the casting which should help a bunch. Lynn Last edited by NHRASuperStock455SD; 01-08-2007 at 01:41 AM. |
#57
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Who cares? As long as I know that it's a Pontiac, and not a chebby, I'm happy!
__________________
Bill 64 GTO, tube chassis w/606" IA tall deck, PG & a pro geared Fab 9". 2750 lbs. 8.2550@164.17-1/4, 5.2901@131.97-1/8, 1.1981-60-ft. 8/10/08 |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
Believe me, when that engine is what it should be, metalic blue, they know it's not a crapy chevy
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
To my knowledge PMD never produced any hemi heads. Seems kind of foreign to me when compared to RA-V heads. Just seems to me that at least an aftermarket RA-V head would have a little more PMD lineage than a hemi head would. Maybe pontiac could have taken their RA-V research further if they had been allowed. We'll never know. With that said i'm glad to see any kind of fresh thinking/design/products that are for pontiacs. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
What ever happend to bulldog heads?
|
Reply |
|
|