FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Here is a picture of mine....there are no stickers on them but they could have been removed.... I did a search for Canada pontiac hub caps and the ones from the cars from Canada all say Pontiac pontiac on them none say PMD on them
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Jerry, you provided a good write up here.
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=619742 Also, I do not believe either of these caps (9774609 or 5738083) was used on any Canadian Pontiac model. The marking on the cap reverse would have been to identify that the cap was produced in Canada, nothing more. "Pontiac Motor Division" was generally included on wheel covers and hubcaps designed in the late '50s thru the mid '60s. This is true of 9774609, as it originated in '64. It was unusual in that it remained the std hubcap for several more model years. Most wheel cover and hubcap designs were short-lived. Wheel covers designed for '66 were generally devoid of any Pontiac identifier. Wheel covers designed for '67 thru '69 tended to say "PMD" on the center cap. One exception was the '71-'72 Custom wheel cover, it showed "Pontiac Motor Division". AFAIK, it was a new design for '71, not a reprise of an earlier wheel cover, so it was an exception to the general convention. New designs from about '72 up began to generally show the Arrowhead in the center. I think the Canadian Pontiacs had their own distinct hubcaps and wheel covers. But it is possible that PMD enlisted the Canadian vendor to produce the 5738083 as a cheaper alternative to the 9774609 stainless cap and the "Pontiac Pontiac" identifier might have been same as used on caps produced at the time by that vendor for Canadian Pontiacs and the "Pontiac Pontiac" may have helped to minimize the tooling requirements. |
The Following User Says Thank You to John V. For This Useful Post: | ||
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
In my previous assignment one of my tasks was to go through all the product literature (advertisements, brochures, owner manuals, service manuals) and make sure it was accurate and that any adverstising claims were substantiable. I had to sign a document on behalf of the Vehicle Chief Engineer stating such. So - I say all this to say: you know there's a possiblity for mistakes to slip though in those! (lol) K
__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible '63 Grand Prix '65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 original mile Royal Pontiac factory racer '74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.85 @ 136 mph besthttp://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/ My Pontiac Story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524 "Intro from an old Assembly Plant Guy":http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926 |
The Following User Says Thank You to Keith Seymore For This Useful Post: | ||
Reply |
|
|