Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 02-09-2022, 12:06 PM
Hesster1977's Avatar
Hesster1977 Hesster1977 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Michigan
Posts: 168
Default

Good Q-Jet Read from HO Article Volume 2, Number 6 from my archives.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Q Jet 1.jpg
Views:	147
Size:	115.4 KB
ID:	583804   Click image for larger version

Name:	Q Jet 2.jpg
Views:	118
Size:	110.8 KB
ID:	583805  

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hesster1977 For This Useful Post:
  #22  
Old 02-09-2022, 01:42 PM
4mula73's Avatar
4mula73 4mula73 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Flowood, MS
Posts: 349
Default

Can't recommend Shaker455 on here enough! He did a 7043262 for me a few years back and it was spot on. Car sat for a few years and still fired right up with some fresh gas! He spent a ton of time giving advice on my build as well. Would 100% go to him again

__________________
73 Formula. 9.1:1 400 .030" over, TRW forged pistons, hand ported 6X-4s milled to 85cc, Ferrea 2.11/1.77, Crower 68404 springs, 276°/284° 228°/236° @.050 .474"/.474" 112 LSA, Performer RPM, Shaker Tuned Qjet, Hooker 1.75" headers. TH400, Hughes GM25 converter. 4.10 gear for now. 1st Drive: 12/30/16. *SOLD*

74 Trans Am 455 AT Buccaneer Red
  #23  
Old 02-10-2022, 10:06 AM
goatman1970 goatman1970 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belpre, OH, USA
Posts: 24
Default

Don Johnston of DCI Motorsports in Akron. He cut his teeth on the Q-jet. Check out his web site, give him a call.

  #24  
Old 02-10-2022, 10:26 AM
z man z man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: queens, ny
Posts: 109
Default 68 qjet

Remember picking up a carb on eBay for my 68. Sent it out for a complete rebuild to reputable known source. Paid handsomely for rework and replaying. Installed on car and had many issues. Opened carb to find insides peeling amongst new parts. Called back and forth. Resent and received. Reinstalled to find no base plate vacuumed ports. Ended up selling the carb to the rebuilder at a loss. Sound familiar? Be careful, and I wasn’t a novice

  #25  
Old 02-10-2022, 10:27 AM
z man z man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: queens, ny
Posts: 109
Default

Replanting

  #26  
Old 02-10-2022, 10:32 AM
MUSLCAH MUSLCAH is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: N.H.
Posts: 1,923
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff R View Post
Bulleit barrel strength, Henry McKenna 10 year, and Four Roses Small Batch are at the top of the list, Blanton's when I can find it. There are a few others on the list as well when I can find them, but when you discover a good one it very quickly becomes very expensive and difficult to obtain.

There are a few at lower price points and usually readily available that make the grade, Evan Williams Single Barrel is decent for the price, and even their 1783 isn't to bad for around $20.......
Cliff….have yah tried this stuff yet ?Click image for larger version

Name:	C3FD3D37-52EC-4333-AD75-C118C830C415.jpg
Views:	136
Size:	58.4 KB
ID:	583844

  #27  
Old 02-10-2022, 10:47 AM
Hesster1977's Avatar
Hesster1977 Hesster1977 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Michigan
Posts: 168
Default

For the DIY crowd, a few good Q-Jet articles from my archives:
1. Thunder Am Mag August 1980, Volume 1, Number 5.
2. High Output monthly Newsletter May 1977, Volume 3, Number 10.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	TA Q-Jet 1.jpg
Views:	111
Size:	115.6 KB
ID:	583845   Click image for larger version

Name:	TA Q-Jet 2.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	147.8 KB
ID:	583846   Click image for larger version

Name:	HO May 77 Q-Jet 1.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	87.2 KB
ID:	583847   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ho May 77 Q-Jet 2.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	79.2 KB
ID:	583848  

The Following User Says Thank You to Hesster1977 For This Useful Post:
  #28  
Old 02-10-2022, 03:11 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

Compared to all of the Q-Jet mods required to have the thing function properly on the vehicle tells me that by 1973/1974 the Q-Jet quality was not the same as the earlier stuff.

Tom V.

Vote for Shaker455 too as Cliff has retired.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #29  
Old 02-10-2022, 05:24 PM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,000
Default

Cliff….have yah tried this stuff yet ?

We get into the Eagle Rare on occasion, top shelf!...

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #30  
Old 02-10-2022, 05:27 PM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,000
Default

https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...1&d=1644528414
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1961.jpg
Views:	184
Size:	95.6 KB
ID:	583861  

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #31  
Old 02-10-2022, 06:02 PM
Greg Reid's Avatar
Greg Reid Greg Reid is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Palmetto, GA. USA
Posts: 16,166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff R View Post
I'm no connoisseur of bourbon but you have one of my favorites in that photo... Woodford Reserve.

__________________
Greg Reid
Palmetto, Georgia

  #32  
Old 02-11-2022, 01:10 PM
shaker455's Avatar
shaker455 shaker455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NH
Posts: 4,471
Default

Hey Big Matt
Thanks for reaching out to us and will be happy to go thru your carburetor,calibrate, and live test for your combo as well as curving your distributor.
Thanks also to all PY members for the referral.
Cheers!

__________________
Carburetor building & modification services
Servicing the Pontiac community over 20 years
  #33  
Old 02-11-2022, 03:02 PM
Pav8427 Pav8427 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 65
Default

Just curious. To the gurus out there. When you test run a Quad on your test engines. Your engines are set up with,
X cubes, X compression, X cam etc. etc. How do you accomidate for customers engine running Y cubes, Ycompression, Y cam etc. etc. ?

  #34  
Old 02-13-2022, 07:47 AM
oldcarbs oldcarbs is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 21
Default

[QUOTE=Tom Vaught;6317774]Compared to all of the Q-Jet mods required to have the thing function properly on the vehicle tells me that by 1973/1974 the Q-Jet quality was not the same as the earlier stuff.

Tom V.

Tom , all the later quadrajets were better quality than earlier ones. They had better float system and better well plugs for example. Each company ( chevy ,pontiac, olds, buick) did things a little different. They all metered fuel better than an after market holley.

The Following User Says Thank You to oldcarbs For This Useful Post:
  #35  
Old 02-13-2022, 08:54 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,000
Default

The newer the Quadrajet the better carburetor it will be. Even the excellent 1973-74 455 Super Duty units aren't nearly as good as a 1976-79 Pontiac carb from a 350 or 400.

The factory continued to make improvements to the design over the years and the new units will have better castings, better design, big CFM and dead solid reliable in long term service.

Folks lean toward early units simply because emission mandates weren't as tight when they were made so they had more idle and off idle fuel, not because there was anything better about them anyplace.

Take a plain old 1977 Pontiac Q-jet from a 350 engine. It has APT, excellent hinge pin location/leverage on the needle/seat, 850cfm when the throttle plates/secondary airflaps acheive full opening, converts easily to e-choke, the best secondary POE system used, and fully adjustable choke pull-off without bending anything. I use one on my own engine and nothing will outrun it on the dyno or at the track, and believe me many have tried over the years!.........Cliff

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #36  
Old 02-13-2022, 09:37 AM
5th TA 5th TA is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 18
Default

Cliff,

Out of curiosity, I have a quadrajet on the 301 Pontiac that came on my 1980 TA with a normally aspirated 301. I installed a rebuild kit that I got from you a couple of years ago. Afterwards the engine drive ability was great, power was about what you would expect for a stock 301. Throttle response was good enough to squeal the rear tires from a dead stop even with a 2:41 rear axel.

Last year I replaced my stock 301 with a Buttler Performance 461. Just curious if the quadrajet from my 301 could have been used on my 461 if it was recalibrated. My apologies if this is a stupid question.

  #37  
Old 02-13-2022, 10:24 AM
Hesster1977's Avatar
Hesster1977 Hesster1977 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Michigan
Posts: 168
Default

Good read on the Q-Jet applications, from my HO Archives .
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Q-Jet ID pg1.jpg
Views:	91
Size:	102.6 KB
ID:	584060   Click image for larger version

Name:	Q-Jet ID pg2.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	104.3 KB
ID:	584061  

  #38  
Old 02-13-2022, 10:43 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,000
Default

"Last year I replaced my stock 301 with a Buttler Performance 461. Just curious if the quadrajet from my 301 could have been used on my 461 if it was recalibrated. My apologies if this is a stupid question."

Yes, the Pontiac Q-jet from the 301 would have done a fine job on your 461, as good as if not better than anything else you could have put up there....IMHO.

The 301 carburetors still used the big castings so have 850cfm potential. They do however require a bit more work than one from a 350 or 400 as the factory limited CFM from the secondaries by not allowing the throttle plates to come nearly to full open plus they put a long "stop" on the air flaps to limit their opening as well. Otherwise they are very close to the carbs used on the 350's and 400's and even better than lack the large front vent tube that makes that variety a little more difficult to use in non-stock applications.

So basically it would have only needed calibrated for what you are doing, a bend on the baseplate linkage to bring the huge secondary throttle plates to fully open at WOT, and grinding some material from the long stop on the airflap shaft to get them open to the correct point........Cliff

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017