The Body Shop TECH General questions that don't fit in any other forum

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-24-2001, 10:36 PM
zedo zedo is offline
On Vacation
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Pa.
Posts: 360
Default

Well I've got the painting bug again recently, comes around every 10 years or so. I want to paint my cars, they really need it. Fun too.

Anyway, there's 5 types of paints available that are of any interest for my old Pontiac. Lacquer, Synthetic Enamel, Acrylic Enamel, Acrylic Urethane, and Polyurethane. All but Lacquer can be "catalyzed" with an isocyanate hardener, nasty stuff, can kill you if you get too much of it in your body. Absorbs through the skin too (need a damn good repirator). But rock-hard glossy finish is the results.

I really wanted to put black Imron (a polyurethane) on my '70 GTO for durability, but have heard it will not have as much gloss as a Acrylic Urethane, from many sources. Also, I'm thinking base/clear for longer durability. Now I'm leaning towards acrylic urethane.

The question: What are your experiences with these paints, how many have you used, and what's the best. Especially, anyone ever try Imron ?? What's on YOUR car ??

Thanks all.

  #2  
Old 11-24-2001, 10:36 PM
zedo zedo is offline
On Vacation
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Pa.
Posts: 360
Default

Well I've got the painting bug again recently, comes around every 10 years or so. I want to paint my cars, they really need it. Fun too.

Anyway, there's 5 types of paints available that are of any interest for my old Pontiac. Lacquer, Synthetic Enamel, Acrylic Enamel, Acrylic Urethane, and Polyurethane. All but Lacquer can be "catalyzed" with an isocyanate hardener, nasty stuff, can kill you if you get too much of it in your body. Absorbs through the skin too (need a damn good repirator). But rock-hard glossy finish is the results.

I really wanted to put black Imron (a polyurethane) on my '70 GTO for durability, but have heard it will not have as much gloss as a Acrylic Urethane, from many sources. Also, I'm thinking base/clear for longer durability. Now I'm leaning towards acrylic urethane.

The question: What are your experiences with these paints, how many have you used, and what's the best. Especially, anyone ever try Imron ?? What's on YOUR car ??

Thanks all.

  #3  
Old 11-25-2001, 08:55 AM
jim darlington jim darlington is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton Pa USA
Posts: 509
Default

Zedo ,
Painted alot of Harleys years ago with Imron . Today the bikes look good yet . No paint chips and the gloss held up well .
Now I use Dupont chromabase basecoat / clearcoat . Why you ask ? It's user friendly . I'm able to take old Pontiac colors and convert them into todays colors. The paint last for a long time . If a customer brings the car back for spot repair , it can be done easily and with a good color match .
From your post , it sounds like you have alot of painting experiance . If so then use the system that works well with you .
You kow what I'm talking about if your in this business . Just my .02 worth .

__________________
Man is not complete until he's married , then he is finished !
  #4  
Old 11-25-2001, 10:28 AM
zedo zedo is offline
On Vacation
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Pa.
Posts: 360
Default

Jim,

Thanks a lot for input, believe me, I appreciate it.

I've had a lot of paint jobs done in the past, from straight lacquer and enamel to BC/CC AE to BC/CC urethane. But I'm not in the business, although I have done a few jobs for myself and for money to keep the wolf away at times- (they were straight lacquer or enamel, and catalyzed AE.) I also worked in a body shop doing bondo/primer/prep work and lacquer repairs for 3 years during 1984-87. But by no stretch am I a professional painter. I do try to keep informed on the systems available though.

The painting products have become so advanced and expensive, and the ISO's dangerous, that I'm looking for as much info as possible on the systems before I paint my 2 cars over again. This will be my first time out using catalyzed urethanes. I'd like to paint my 2 cars myself, but now I realize I'd need a supplied air respirator for true safety, and preferably a spray booth to get a prof. looking job. Thanks again for info.

Chromabase is an Acrylic Urethane right ??

  #5  
Old 11-25-2001, 01:34 PM
J.C.you's Avatar
J.C.you J.C.you is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: moccasin bayou, Louisiana
Posts: 4,827
Default

Agree with Jim, have had sucess with Dupont chromabase base, clear. Also color matching for spot repairs, blends great. You might consider Nason b/c under this same brand, cheaper, just as good for entire repaints.

------------------

__________________


1963 Cat SD Clone (old school) streeter
1964 GTO post coupe, tripower, 4speed (build)
1965 GTO 389 tripower, 4 speed, driver
1966 GTO dragcar
1966 GTO Ragtop
1969 Tempest ET clone street/strip
1969 GTO Judge RA lll, auto
1969 GTO limelight Conv. 4speed go and show (sold)
1970 GP SSJ
1970 GTO barn find..TLB…390 horse?….yeh, 390
1972 GTO 455 HO, 4 speed, (build)
1973 Grand Safari wagon, 700hp stoplight sleeper
525ci DCI & 609ci LM V head builds
  #6  
Old 11-25-2001, 02:01 PM
6567GTO's Avatar
6567GTO 6567GTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shelton, CT USA
Posts: 2,114
Default

DuPont Chromabase is what was used on my ... "Waxer". I like the results.

------------------
Life is too short. Don't be a dick! (That is unless of course you're dealing with the Taliban)

[This message has been edited by 6567GTO (edited 11-25-2001).]

__________________
_________________________
_________________________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qZgOpn-w-o <<< Burnout Video
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Treat Me Good, I'll Treat You Better; Treat Me Bad, I'll Treat You Worse"
Sonny Barger
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  #7  
Old 11-25-2001, 02:32 PM
zedo zedo is offline
On Vacation
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Pa.
Posts: 360
Default

hahaha- I like the waxer comment.

My Firebird has been repainted 3 times in the last 20 years. It was a silver enamel repaint job, bad quarters, when we got it in the 80's. We had the quarters replaced with patch panels, and black BC/CC Acrylic Enamel put on. That was good for a few years, but then the clear delaminated and started to peel, a Sherwin Williams defect. So then I stripped the whole thing and did a white lacquer job in 1990. Well that looked good for a few more years, but then the rockers got rusty and came through. From driving here in Pa., the new quarters rotted again !! So now it's been stripped again, will get quarters again and rockers, and either URETHANED or IMRON-ed. I want these paint jobs to last already, sick of doing them over.

When I put my GTO back together in 1990, I didn't even bother painting it after all the bad luck I had with paying shops for paint jobs. It just wasn't worth it !! So I primed it and painted it flat black !!

Well now I realize that the old lacquer and enamels we were using are pretty crappy for holdout and UV protection, actually pathetic. So the GTO will also be done with a modern catalyzed urethane or poly-u.

I have to admit, the holdout of Imron is damn tempting. Guys with airplanes clean the stuff by wiping it with lacquer thinner, and it doesn't hurt the paint !! Now THAT'S tough !! I've also talked to guys with 15+ year old Imron jobs, and they say they still look good. But the new acrylic urethanes are supposed to be higher gloss and more color selection. Imron has the worst iso content, too, very toxic while spraying.

[This message has been edited by zedo (edited 11-25-2001).]

  #8  
Old 11-25-2001, 04:09 PM
jim darlington jim darlington is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton Pa USA
Posts: 509
Default

JC ...
I wouldn't recommend the Nason brand you were talking about . Yes the cost factor is to our benefit but there are a couple of things you must look at .
1 - the base color will not match the manufactores color chip .You can't use it on a spot repair on any of todays cars . It won't even match it self if you need to do a spot repair . The color was made only for a complete overall on a cheaper paint job . ie Maaco .
2 - the clear is a spin off of 7500 & 7600 without all the UV protection properties . Check it out a couple of years from now .
Nason paint line was made to compete with all the generitic paint out there . It does have it's place in the paint world but not on old GTO's .Maybe Chebbies !

Zedo ......Chromabase base is a spin off of acrylic enamel with out a hardner . It uses a reducer .However you can use a hardner . It helps on the paint chips on front rubber bumpers . The clear is a poly urathane . For excellent results use Chroma Premire clear .

__________________
Man is not complete until he's married , then he is finished !
  #9  
Old 11-25-2001, 04:18 PM
jim darlington jim darlington is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton Pa USA
Posts: 509
Default

Zedo ,
BTW Sherwin Williams was known for it's clear peeing off . That's why alot of shops got away from it and switched paint systems . Hell I can remember back in the 80's when we used it . A customer would bring the car back at a later date and when we would tape over what was painted before . when we took the tape off .... the clear would come off with it . Thank god those nightmares are behind us now . Sherwin Williams would never admit they had a problem .

__________________
Man is not complete until he's married , then he is finished !
  #10  
Old 11-25-2001, 11:53 PM
J.C.you's Avatar
J.C.you J.C.you is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: moccasin bayou, Louisiana
Posts: 4,827
Default

Jim, agree with you on the clear Nason. I've been shooting the Nason base for entire repaints. Stated so in the earlier post. One way to use Nason for spot repair is to purchase too much paint upon initial purchase. Still alot cheaper than chromabase. You can store leftover paint and reuse in case of spot repair needed. If you want UV protection you can shoot the chromabase clear over the Nason base. Since Zedo was talking black color I didn't consider spot repairs a factor.

------------------

__________________


1963 Cat SD Clone (old school) streeter
1964 GTO post coupe, tripower, 4speed (build)
1965 GTO 389 tripower, 4 speed, driver
1966 GTO dragcar
1966 GTO Ragtop
1969 Tempest ET clone street/strip
1969 GTO Judge RA lll, auto
1969 GTO limelight Conv. 4speed go and show (sold)
1970 GP SSJ
1970 GTO barn find..TLB…390 horse?….yeh, 390
1972 GTO 455 HO, 4 speed, (build)
1973 Grand Safari wagon, 700hp stoplight sleeper
525ci DCI & 609ci LM V head builds
  #11  
Old 01-09-2002, 12:56 AM
ChrisTransAm78's Avatar
ChrisTransAm78 ChrisTransAm78 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 1,274
Default

Does Por 15 work well? I just got some and am hoping as many around here (Austin, Tx) said it was good stuff. Just don't want it to ever come back!

__________________
http://www.christransam78.com/
  #12  
Old 01-09-2002, 11:22 PM
larry davis larry davis is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Posts: 2,543
Default

Most all the major players (Sherwinn-Williams, Ditzler, PPG, Dupont, House of Colors, etc...)have an excellent top end product.
I currently have House of Color candy carmel in a urethane on my 78 T/A. It's been on it for 11 years & has held up well, but is in need of a new paint job now. HOC products are expensive!
I have used the Sherwinn-Williams Sunfire line of urethanes on my Chevelle & Vega waqon. I really like it better than any other product I've tried. The amount of metallic dust (flake), depth of color, gloss, and ease of the entire system to use is excellent. The price is good as well. I like the base coat / clear coat system best.
Make sure you follow their procedures & utilize the recommended additives/reducers.
I believe Sherwinn-Williams has upgraded/changed it to another name, but it's still the same product. Check out their web site.

__________________


SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY!
  #13  
Old 01-15-2002, 03:00 AM
SSMAN66 SSMAN66 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cypress, CA
Posts: 43
Default

I've been restoring GTO's for nearly 13 years, and here is my experience with various types of paint:

lacquer - Very easy to work with....quick to prepare, shoot, and dry. If you make a mistake you can sand it out and reshoot an hour later. The downside is that it's somewhat soft for the first few months (while residual thinner evaporates). This also tends to dull the finish (shrinkage), and requires a 2nd color sanding and buffing after 3-6 months. Lacquer seems to chip (and/or tear) easily.

acrylic urethane (basecoat/clearcoat) - More complicated preparation and application....you must adhere to the directions without fail (short pot life). The finish coat can be color sanded and buffed after 48 hours. The finish has a very high gloss, but is still somewhat brittle and easy to chip......better than lacquer, but still not great.

acrylic enamel (basecoat/clearcoat) - Similar preparation and application as urethane....same dry time, etc. The finish has incredible luster and seems to be much tougher than urethane. I use acrylic enamel for everything I paint.

Email me if you want to see some pics.

I hope this helps.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017