Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 04-27-2018, 04:55 PM
77 TRASHCAN's Avatar
77 TRASHCAN 77 TRASHCAN is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 31May2013 Temporary home to the world's widest (that we know of) tornado. Lord, NO more Please...
Posts: 6,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lust4speed View Post
Except that's backwards since a longer rod should have less piston rock. Could have been a build issue not related to rod length at all. I'm running the 6.8 rods and 4.5" stroke in the drag engine, and believe Frank at AP was the one suggesting the length.
Yeah, I know. I believe there were several issues going on in the engine. He didn't talk about it too much, I believe he was not wanting to stir up any controversy, especially towards the builder...

The RPM catalog shows a 6.8 rod for the 3.25 main crank (4.5" stroke), and a 6.7 rod for the 3.00 main crank. I wonder if the counter weights are larger on the 3.25 main version...

__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A.
I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977.

Shut it off
Shut it off
Buddy, I just shut your Prius down...
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017