Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-18-2009, 12:09 AM
BruceWilkie BruceWilkie is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 9,132
Default

I highly reccomend a Permacool Filter/watertrap. IIRC its rated at over 90 GPM(not gph). I also prefer 2 3/8 hard lines over single # 8 or 10 from pump to regulator(s).

A quick check of inadequate supply (if you suspect a problem) is to put larger jets a few numbers higher in. If you have no change in performance(especially mph) you are not getting enough fuel. This is useful especially if you read the plugs and they appear even the slightest bit lean.

  #22  
Old 01-18-2009, 10:15 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,027
Default

"Mallory does not reccomend a return line with the 140 pump. Been running one since 89 without a rtn line."

Scott, I've been running a Mallory Comp 140 pump since 2001.

We installed it "dead head", and it lasted about 2 months. On long cruises it would start to make a lot of noise, vibration, and fluctuate pressure when the brakes were applied, turns signals on, etc.

It died a miserable death and was so hot when I went back to check it, my hand nearly melted to it! We had it rebuilt under warrantee.

I installed a bypass system, and the same pump ran flawlessly until about a month ago when it gave up again. This time it only needed a new brush set, and was put back in service with a minor rebuild, no other problems anyplace.

I would not run one of those pumps in a daily driver in a "dead-head" set-up, even though Mallory says they can be set up that way.

They would be fine for a weekend warrior or full race car, as the pumps are well made and can tolerate the head pressure in short term use (obviously)....FWIW......Cliff

PS: I would add that after installing the bypass, the pump is nearly dead quiet, even after hours and hours of continuous use, where before it was considerably noisier, but not nearly as noisey as a similiar output vane type pump.

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #23  
Old 01-18-2009, 11:16 AM
tempest455's Avatar
tempest455 tempest455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Hendersonville, TN
Posts: 2,145
Default

The Aeromotive pumps also are regulated and bypass at the pump as well. You modulate the pressure at the pump so if you deadhead at the carb regulator for the set carb PSI, it will not put as much stress on the regulator. When I bought all the stuff for my fuel system, Behling Race Cars suggested this system. I installed this 10 years ago and never had a regulator problem.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0019.1JPG.jpg
Views:	64
Size:	92.0 KB
ID:	154831  

__________________
Tempest455
  #24  
Old 01-18-2009, 11:55 AM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,626
Default

My first Mallory 140 run dead head lasted 10 years of street,autocross and drag miles. Bought a new one and had mallory rebuild the first one as a back up.Been in there 10 years but fewer miles.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #25  
Old 01-18-2009, 12:03 PM
Ron H's Avatar
Ron H Ron H is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Great White North
Posts: 5,807
Default

Last season I found the mallory 140 not keeping up once running 10.30's. It was fine when I was running 10.70's the season before. Swapped to a 250 and all is good.
I changed to a big holley regulator and -8 lines to the carb. Still have -8 from pump to regulator.

__________________
68 Firebird
Are you running with the wind or breaking it?
  #26  
Old 01-18-2009, 01:38 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,304
Default

Mallory 140 would probably have been still ok if you had changed only to the Large (7/16" Ball) Holley Regulator. I think a lot of the issues posted were due to the previous regulator used even in OMT's case.

Tom Vaught

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #27  
Old 01-18-2009, 02:10 PM
wrench's Avatar
wrench wrench is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sterling, CT
Posts: 558
Default

Just an "in case you didn't know", the original post in this thread is over 5 years old.

  #28  
Old 01-18-2009, 03:05 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,304
Default

Actually it is New starting with Post #17.

Bringing up info that works is not necessarily a bad thing for newer members. I have posted several times the same info over the years.
It is that "Old Physics" deal. The basics do not change.

Tom Vaught

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #29  
Old 01-18-2009, 03:31 PM
Ron H's Avatar
Ron H Ron H is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Great White North
Posts: 5,807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
Mallory 140 would probably have been still ok if you had changed only to the Large (7/16" Ball) Holley Regulator. I think a lot of the issues posted were due to the previous regulator used even in OMT's case.

Tom Vaught
I guess that could be Tom. But with the intent of running mid to low nines, I figured why screw around with just the regulator and went with the pump as well.

__________________
68 Firebird
Are you running with the wind or breaking it?
  #30  
Old 01-18-2009, 04:04 PM
rompn63's Avatar
rompn63 rompn63 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Burns Harbor, IN
Posts: 232
Default

Just checked the Mallory site. They list a 140 pump with a 4309 (return) regulator.
Part #4142. I ran that set up for three years without any problems. When I stepped up the motor I added another 140 in tandem. I ran that set up for three more years untill my origional pump finally quit.

  #31  
Old 01-18-2009, 04:32 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,304
Default

The Mallory Regulator Joe has been using (as well as a lot of the other Nostalgia SS Racers) is a good one. Mallory offers a retun style regulator, why not use one.

The Mallory 140 pump supposedly will put out 14 psi. With the AFB type carbs the NSS guys run (low fuel pressure required) the return regulator is a great idea. Course they have 4 needles and seats taking fuel, 8 barrels, and 4 fuel reservoirs for holding a lot of fuel going down the strip.

Tom Vaught

ps Jim Brady switched to a Mallory 140 and 7/16" Ball Holley Regulator and picked up 3 tenths. His 64 GTO would run in the 9s easily.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #32  
Old 01-20-2009, 08:17 PM
cgeise's Avatar
cgeise cgeise is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ellensburg,WA
Posts: 2,940
Default

Berry grant has a good section on there web site for "testing" flow on your set up - checki it out - If i remember - a ten sec car should pump a gallon in 15 seconds - better check it to make sure.

  #33  
Old 01-21-2009, 09:45 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,027
Default

Last time I checked flow we filled a 6 gallon can in just under 2 minutes, something like a minute 50 seconds, nearly as I can remember. This is with a Mallory Comp 140 pump, bypass open (our bypass is before the regulator), and stock Holley regulator, 8AN lines/fittings everyplace. Guess that's about a gallon every 18 seconds. Fine so far with our new engine running low 11's with a q-jet and .145" fuel inlet seat.....Cliff

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #34  
Old 01-21-2009, 10:21 AM
Ron H's Avatar
Ron H Ron H is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Great White North
Posts: 5,807
Default

FWIW I changed out the mallory regulator for the big holley.

__________________
68 Firebird
Are you running with the wind or breaking it?
  #35  
Old 01-21-2009, 10:48 AM
GTOGEORGE's Avatar
GTOGEORGE GTOGEORGE is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Rockwood, MICHIGAN
Posts: 8,884
Default Bigger is Better!

When it comes to fuel systems....................BIGGER is always better. This is coming from a lot of experience.


GTO George

  #36  
Old 01-22-2009, 08:46 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,027
Default

Agreed. Always better to go with a fuel system good for low 10 second runs on an 11 second car, than the other way around! We still hear on occassion how the quadrajets fuel bowl is too small. Not so, it only has one needle/seat assembly, so a first rate fuel delivery system is required to keep in full on hard runs. Nothing exotic needed, but don't expect to run a Carter HP mechanical pump pulling thru stock lines and run mid-10's with one!......Cliff

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #37  
Old 01-23-2009, 02:27 PM
ta man ta man is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Clinton,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 5,366
Default

I'm installing larger lines this year what are you guys using these days for fuel lines?

  #38  
Old 01-23-2009, 08:38 PM
taff2's Avatar
taff2 taff2 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Wales in UK.
Posts: 2,172
Default

15mm copper tube as used in home plumbing,half the weight of braided hose and half the price of aluminum line.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017