FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
aluminum D vs. round port heads
I see a lot of posts from guys running aluminum D-port heads. I get the reasoning behind this if a guy already has iron D ports and wants to use his existing headers with a nice upgrade to aluminum heads.
Here is my question - if you don't have D port headers already and they make a round port header for your chassis ... why not just go with aftermarket round port heads? Other than header availability, do aftermarket D port heads have any advantage at all over aftermarket round port heads? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If I was going to run tube headers, I would certainly use round port heads. Last edited by mgarblik; 01-28-2024 at 11:14 AM. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mgarblik For This Useful Post: | ||
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Another part to this that seems to not be considered is if the lesser port volumes ( area ) of the D port heads work better for your particular cid and the way it’s Cam’ed and geared.
Unless the motor is set up for full race and it’s narrow rpm band then it’s the average Tq and HP numbers that matter most .
__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs! And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs! 1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set. Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks. 1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes. Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph. Education is what your left with once you forget things! |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
i have edelbrock d ports and edelbrock round ports. although i think d port header avail is better still you can get round port headers for alot of cars now. i kinda bastard child my edelbrock dports just because i never liked trying to install 64/7 gto headers on d port heads. for whatever reason, i can install round port headers awhole lot easier. its hard to believe that 330cfm can be got out of the dports but butler has a program for it same as round ports, although round ports can go further,
__________________
http://performerrpm.myphotoalbum.com/view_album.php? |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
At the very least, I like the wider bolt spacing on the center ports on round ports.
And, how many pontiac factory round port engines run worse than the d port counterpart? Even the RA2 with it`s d port type intake port is one of pontiac`s best runners. I know we are talking aftermarket heads, but... |
The Following User Says Thank You to PunchT37 For This Useful Post: | ||
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I was starting from a bare block and never considered D ports. My rounds perform great in my street car and it runs like a raped ape…finally.
__________________
468/TKO600 Ford thru bolt equipped 64 Tempest Custom. Custom Nocturne Blue with black interior. Last edited by 64speed; 01-28-2024 at 01:19 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
D ports allow you to run the stock stove choke
__________________
73 T/A 455, 4speed |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Are there any downsides to running round ports on the street? Assume headers and a street/strip engine of 400-462 CID. 290 CFM intake port and HR cam in the 231-245 range on pump gas.
What's the decision tree when going from 260CFM iron heads, to either KRE/Edelbrock D-ports or Edelbrock/SM round ports? At what HP or RPM or application, does the D-port exhaust become a limiting factor?
__________________
I could explain all this to the girl at the parts store, but she'd probably call the asylum. White '67 LeMans 407/TH350/Ford 3.89... RIP Red '67 LeMans. 407/TH400/Ford 3.25 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
D-ports will never make power of a round port. My headers are coated and are 28 years old, never rusted. The flanges are separated never any header leaks. D-ports are ok, if you want to use stock manifolds for a nice street cruiser.
__________________
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I prefer the round ports but there are a few things that might dictate a Dport in certain situations as already mentioned.
Headers are not a big deal to me so that's not even factored in the decision making. Round ports are certainly much easier in that regard anyway and I've run headers for decades on many cars, including daily drivers without a single issue using them. The choice would really just depend on what I'm trying to do with the car. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Just seems like people doing new builds are always going with the D ports and I don't really understand why! I have 87 cc round port edelbrocks with the old chamber style in a 505 with old faithful and a performer RPM, I can't imagine anyone driving my car and thinking, "ya know, this thing just needs smaller intake ports so it has more low-end" ...
|
The Following User Says Thank You to i82much For This Useful Post: | ||
#12
|
||||
|
||||
My guess is probably cost being the biggest player lol
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Formulajones For This Useful Post: | ||
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But if you don't have headers already and new round port heads cost about the same as new d port heads .... |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
the cost cant be it, the d ports are more money, i think a few hundred more than even the cnc round ports.
i only bought d ports because my kids car was already running with 6x4s and we was gonna upgrade what he had. but i will say the edelbrock dport is a nice looking head much nicer than my 72cc old style heads i originally bought
__________________
http://performerrpm.myphotoalbum.com/view_album.php? |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Factory iron D ports can be ported to go 290 intake cfm at less then 190 CCs , so why is it so hard to believe that aftermarket aluminum D ports can go 330 when they start off at atleast 188 CCs if not 200?
__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs! And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs! 1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set. Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks. 1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes. Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph. Education is what your left with once you forget things! |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to steve25 For This Useful Post: | ||
#17
|
||||
|
||||
i thought 260 270 was kinda reaching the limits of an iron d port.
__________________
http://performerrpm.myphotoalbum.com/view_album.php? |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Like has been mentioned. Most Pontiac heads came in D-port. It's what we all were use too. Folks would always have had d-port manifolds or headers. Having said that, A lot of folks would have just upgraded to D-Port Aluminum heads if available. There's a reason Kaufman came out with a D-port aluminum Head. and now Edelbrock came out with a D-Port head. You can build a nice 600 h/P street engine with d-ports.
__________________
68 Firebird. IA2 block, 505 cu in, SD Performance E-head, Solid roller 3600 weight. Reid TH400 4:11 gear. 29" slick. Best so far 9.95@134 mph. 1.43 60 ft. 76 Trans am, TKX .81 o/d, 3.73 Moser rearend, 468 with KRE D-ports, Doug headers, 3" Exh. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
From what I've seen CNC Dports from Kauffman to go about 325 cfm are about $3200. CNC eddy round ports from Butler at the same 325 cfm are $3700.
So yeah there is a price difference but that's not where the extra costs stop. There are exhaust differences to consider and when people already have a dport car with d port manifolds they are reluctant to spend the extra money for the change. Now you're looking at RA manifolds or headers that have to be swapped and that doesn't always line up with your existing exhaust system either so there are some cost modifications there to consider. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Steve C asked me to post this as he is currently unable.
here ya go, compliments of Steve........ https://www.motortrend.com/how-to/in...head-edelbrock |
Reply |
|
|