Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-14-2020, 08:56 PM
JKrull66's Avatar
JKrull66 JKrull66 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Midland Tx
Posts: 849
Send a message via AIM to JKrull66
Default oversize lifter 389

Is there a good alternative to a .842 lifter. We have a tripower block that the stock lifters are plenty loose. want to stay w a hyd lifter. I see chevy has some bigger but always heard the band was in wrong place.
Thanks John

__________________
Beers Bikes Babes and Pontiacs Rule!!!

63 Lemans in the 9's race
66 GTO HT Cruiser
06 Triumph Rocket III TURBO! 2300 CC Bad boy
KTM 525 Dirt Terrorizer
POLARIS 900 RZR
10 GMC SLT Duramax Haul anything anywhere
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?...app_2392950137
  #2  
Old 12-14-2020, 09:42 PM
PontiacJim1959 PontiacJim1959 is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Gastonia, NC
Posts: 492
Default

Yep, Chevy lifters have the band in the wrong place.

Only thing I am aware of is to bush the lifter bores and have them honed to spec. Others with more engine building experience should add more, But I think the bronze bushings are the way to go, but may cost.

The Following User Says Thank You to PontiacJim1959 For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 12-14-2020, 11:16 PM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 6,381
Default

Look at a Small block Ford lifter it's .875. I've used SBF solid roller lifters on a few Pontiac builds but never looked into the HFT working.

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
The Following User Says Thank You to PAUL K For This Useful Post:
  #4  
Old 12-15-2020, 07:28 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,906
Default

The cost of boring the lifters .033" over to use the Ford lifter can't be all that much less then bushing the bores I would think?

Also either way thining up the walls of the bores by .015" or so does not give me a fuzzy warm feeling about the wall strength left, but I guess in terms of a street Hydro Cam with no more then 300 psi of open spring pressure things will be ok aleast in terms of the lesser loaded lifter bores on the driver side of the motor.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
The Following User Says Thank You to steve25 For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 12-15-2020, 12:55 PM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 6,381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve25 View Post
The cost of boring the lifters .033" over to use the Ford lifter can't be all that much less then bushing the bores I would think?

Also either way thining up the walls of the bores by .015" or so does not give me a fuzzy warm feeling about the wall strength left, but I guess in terms of a street Hydro


It depends how one goes about doing it but it should cost around half as much as bushing the block. As far as strength goes, one we did around 1998 has been as high as 270 on the seat and 750 open with a 280 degree @ .050 solid roller and is still working fine. I'm sure it will give many years of service with a HFT camshaft.

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
  #6  
Old 12-15-2020, 06:27 PM
krisr's Avatar
krisr krisr is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sydney, OZ
Posts: 1,443
Default

My solid roller lifters were on the high end of tolerance with my lifter bores so if my block ever needed to come apart again in my life time I was going to look into the 0.875" lifter conversion. Paul, is there much difference in the band location with a Ford lifter compared to Pontiac?

__________________
'71 Holden HQ Monaro - 3850lbs race weight, 400c/i - 11.4 @ 120
'66 Pontiac GTO - 389, 4 speed street cruiser
  #7  
Old 12-16-2020, 02:25 AM
Jack Gifford's Avatar
Jack Gifford Jack Gifford is offline
formerly 'Pontiac Jack'
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Phelps, NY 14532
Posts: 10,188
Default

My hemi V8 has Ford roller lifters that I modified (custom pushrod seats for the large pushrod angles). I don't recall modifying the oil feed at all.

__________________
Anybody else on this planet campaign a M/T hemi Pontiac for eleven seasons?
... or has built a record breaking DOHC hemi four cylinder Pontiac?
... or has driven a couple laps of Nuerburgring with Tri-Power Pontiac power?(back in 1967)
  #8  
Old 12-16-2020, 01:11 PM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 6,381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krisr View Post
My solid roller lifters were on the high end of tolerance with my lifter bores so if my block ever needed to come apart again in my life time I was going to look into the 0.875" lifter conversion. Paul, is there much difference in the band location with a Ford lifter compared to Pontiac?
Crower Pontiac on the right and Isky Ford on the left
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	20201216_110513.jpg
Views:	139
Size:	61.9 KB
ID:	556254  

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
The Following User Says Thank You to PAUL K For This Useful Post:
  #9  
Old 12-16-2020, 07:16 PM
krisr's Avatar
krisr krisr is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sydney, OZ
Posts: 1,443
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PAUL K View Post
Crower Pontiac on the right and Isky Ford on the left
Nice! Thanks mate!

__________________
'71 Holden HQ Monaro - 3850lbs race weight, 400c/i - 11.4 @ 120
'66 Pontiac GTO - 389, 4 speed street cruiser
The Following User Says Thank You to krisr For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017