Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-14-2018, 05:28 PM
gtolarry gtolarry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 43
Default Another 455 cam suggestion

Hello all I would like some info on a cam that I have and if it would be good to run or change to a newer camshaft.
the cam is an Ultradyne 280/288 @110
I have a 455 with 96 heads running at zero deck hight. The heads have some bowl work done and are port matched to an Edelbrock manifold. I will be running HO manifolds with 2.5 " exhaust all this in a 67 gto with turbo 400 and 323 rear gear.
Will the current cam be well suited to street duty or do I need something along the lines of a comp xe274 or 744 pontiac cam or go bigger such as an 041 pontiac cam. I would like good vacuum to run the accessories pb and ac. I would like it to run very well on the highway as well as an occasional visit to the strip. I know this is HFT cam and would like to stay with the same thing. I know there are some very knowledgeable people here so any suggestions will be appreciated Thank you

  #2  
Old 06-14-2018, 06:03 PM
pastry_chef's Avatar
pastry_chef pastry_chef is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,300
Default

Which Edelbrock intake?

Do you run a stock torque converter?

A member Sprocket ran that UD cam.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprocket View Post
Ultradyne 280/288 is the exact cam you seek. 223/231 @ 0.050", .460/.490 lift, 110 LSA. Slightly choppy idle so everyone thinks you mean business but it is actually easy going. Gobs and gobs of torque and falls off around 5200 rpm or so in the 455. Works great with manifolds - no need for headers. That cam propelled my '70 GP with 455, unported 4X heads, TH400, and 3.42 gears to 13.00 quarter mile passes in 95+ degree heat, and my mom could drive the car around without ever complaining. Do not go any smaller in a 455.
Here is dyno results for a Voodoo 703 cam.

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=776169

  #3  
Old 06-14-2018, 08:11 PM
stickboy's Avatar
stickboy stickboy is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 594
Default

I ran that cam on a 112 LSA in 455 w/ a ported 96 head, 9.6 compression in front of a Richmond 5 speed and 2.73 gears. engine loved it. Very easy driving on the street, 16" vacuum, plenty of power. 5200 seems about right.Ran 12.50's with RA manifolds, 12.20's w/ headers. 112 mph. Put down 350 at the tire w/ the headers so like 400 at the crank.

__________________
65 GTO, 3800#, 474, KRE Dport 330 cfm, 11:1 on pump gas, XE 242 248 solid roller, T56 trans, 3.90 gear, 11.26 @ 124 mph
  #4  
Old 06-14-2018, 08:19 PM
Sprocket's Avatar
Sprocket Sprocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 230
Default

Yes, I ran that cam for many years with good success. My combo using that cam was '70 GP, 455 +0.030, stock bottom end, 4X 96cc heads (2.11/1.77 valves, competition valve job out of the H-O Racing book but no porting), 1.52 rockers, Edelbrock RPM intake, Holley 750cfm Street HP, GTO RA exhaust manifolds, 2.5" full mandrel bent exhaust with X-pipe, TH400, Continental 13" converter, 3.42 rear gear, 28" tires. I did not visit the track much, but in triple digit heat, I could get the car to run 13.0X over and over and over here in DFW.

What I liked about the cam is that it was easy starting, easy driving, zero issues with power accessories or a/c, and yet had a somewhat nasty sounding idle. I drove it all over the place like it was just "a car". What you need to know is that there is lots of torque everywhere all the time! What you also need to know is that the engine is done by 4800 rpm +/-, which is not a problem for the street. I would expect that your worked heads would add maybe a couple hundred rpm to the useable range.

My opinion is that there is no "newer" HFT cam of similar size that is any better than the Ultradyne. I am an 041 in a 455 type guy, but for street work, the UD 280/288 kicks ass. Basically, I ran a stock 455 engine in a heavy car and ran 13.0 without really trying.

__________________
'70 GP Model J
462 Butler ported 87cc Edelbrock D-ports
RPM intake with Holley Sniper 2
CompCams 236/242 hydraulic roller
Tribal Tubes tri-y headers
TH400 13" Continental "Jim Hand Special"
3.50 9" CurrieTrac, 245/45-18 Front, 275/40-18 Rear
  #5  
Old 06-14-2018, 08:36 PM
gtolarry gtolarry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 43
Default

Hello Thanks for the input Will be running stock converter a Performer intake or stock intake that has been opened up a bit.
would this cam work with fuel injection such as the Fitech unit?

  #6  
Old 06-14-2018, 08:38 PM
Sprocket's Avatar
Sprocket Sprocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 230
Default

The cam will be fine with stock converter, and a Performer or stock intake. I have no idea about fuel injection.

__________________
'70 GP Model J
462 Butler ported 87cc Edelbrock D-ports
RPM intake with Holley Sniper 2
CompCams 236/242 hydraulic roller
Tribal Tubes tri-y headers
TH400 13" Continental "Jim Hand Special"
3.50 9" CurrieTrac, 245/45-18 Front, 275/40-18 Rear
  #7  
Old 06-15-2018, 11:49 PM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 1,775
Default

The fi tech should be fine. The cam is not that much over stock. But the engine and fi would prefer a wider lobe spread.
Jay

  #8  
Old 06-16-2018, 01:18 AM
pastry_chef's Avatar
pastry_chef pastry_chef is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay S View Post
The fi tech should be fine. The cam is not that much over stock. But the engine and fi would prefer a wider lobe spread.
Jay
As noted the Fi-Tech will have no complaints,
Paul's dyno result (see post2) on 110 "spread" is impressive.
Never been proven that such an combo may prefer timing events out wider.
The OPS cam and all the larger Ultradyne hyd flats had 110 default.
Butler purchased huge volume from Harold.

A comment from Jones on the exhaust manifold factor.

Quote:
There's two schools of thought on this.
The exhaust manifolds will kill the top-end power, so you can either
forget about top-end power, and focus on making more power down
low, and run a tighter LSA with a single pattern cam, or you can go
with more exhaust duration, and increase the LSA to keep the overlap
down, and try and crutch the top-end power.
For a street/strip engine, I think "school of thought #1" is best.
If you're building a real race engine where the rules are restricting you
to the stock exhaust manifolds, I'd go the other route, because you need
as much top-end as you can get.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

  #9  
Old 06-16-2018, 09:05 AM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 1,775
Default

I didn’t mean to say 110 in general is to narrow. In this case to me it just makes a fairly small cam a little smaller in a big engine and idles slightly worse. Fi shouldn’t care though. It is a nice cam, if I had a ud/288 with 110 ls I would not change it... certainly not suggesting the voodoo 703 is not a great street cam.

  #10  
Old 06-16-2018, 09:33 AM
gtolarry gtolarry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 43
Default

Thank you for the responses. I have run this cam in a 389 tripower 65 with a 4 speed with a 390 gear and it was very impressive on the bottom end. I realize a 455 is a larger engine and an automatic with 323 gear is different altogether. but I did like the torque down low and I would like everything all in by 5000 to 5200 at the most. With that being said this will be street driven to as far as Austin and back so it will se highway miles. Any other suggestions such as should I run 1.65 roller rockers will be appreciated .

  #11  
Old 06-16-2018, 10:47 AM
pastry_chef's Avatar
pastry_chef pastry_chef is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtolarry View Post
Any other suggestions such as should I run 1.65 roller rockers will be appreciated .
Yes to 1.65.
Make certain clearances are adequate for them.

  #12  
Old 06-16-2018, 11:33 AM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,671
Default

A friend has the same cam in a 72 HO Firebird ad works all the accessories fine. Mild but a little more performance than a factory style cam.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017