Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-29-2016, 05:45 PM
dmac dmac is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pastry_chef View Post
Lunati Voodoo 10510702

----------------------------
Hydraulic Flat Tappet Cam. Great torque monster for 400-455 c.i. daily driven street performance vehicle. Excellent torque and HP production with heavier emphasis on the low to mid range.

Advertised Duration (Int/Exh): 262/268
Duration @ .050 (Int/Exh): 219/227
Gross Valve Lift (Int/Exh): .468/.489
LSA/ICL: 112/108
Valve Lash (Int/Exh): Hyd/Hyd
RPM Range: 1300-5500
Just a little too much lift with the 1.6 rockers I already have and need to use.

  #22  
Old 09-29-2016, 05:57 PM
ponyakr's Avatar
ponyakr ponyakr is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Louisiana
Posts: 7,621
Default

"...I want peak power at maybe 3000-4000 rpm..."

A cam that small would probably have less than 210 dur @ .050.

That makes the Summit 2800 your best choice.

I've never seen a dyno test of a low comp 400, with this cam. But, I'll just guess that the torque would peak at somewhere between 2000 & 3000 rpm, and the horsepower would peak at 4000 rpm or just a hair less. It would have a dead smooth idle & plenty of vac. Would probably run completely out of steam at, or just below 5000 rpm.

I wouldn't go any smaller than an 068 clone. But the Summit 2801 is cheaper, with more lift. So, since price is a concern, I'd say the 2801 is your best choice, for use with your Rhoads lifters & 1.6 rockers.


Last edited by ponyakr; 09-29-2016 at 06:10 PM.
  #23  
Old 09-29-2016, 06:35 PM
dmac dmac is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponyakr View Post
"...I want peak power at maybe 3000-4000 rpm..."

A cam that small would probably have less than 210 dur @ .050.

That makes the Summit 2800 your best choice.

I've never seen a dyno test of a low comp 400, with this cam. But, I'll just guess that the torque would peak at somewhere between 2000 & 3000 rpm, and the horsepower would peak at 4000 rpm or just a hair less. It would have a dead smooth idle & plenty of vac. Would probably run completely out of steam at, or just below 5000 rpm.

I wouldn't go any smaller than an 068 clone. But the Summit 2801 is cheaper, with more lift. So, since price is a concern, I'd say the 2801 is your best choice, for use with your Rhoads lifters & 1.6 rockers.
I came to the same conclusion so far with your help. The 2801 ran great in a 10:1 cr 400 I put together a few years ago with just a little rumble. With addition of the rhoads, it should idle a lot smoother and be mild enough to hear the stereo on the highway.

I sold that car to a friend who really just wanted the body. I may even be able to get that same cam from a few years ago. The guy ran the car with the 2801 for about 20 minutes before tearing into it. He ended up with a 464 stroker, aluminum heads, and stump puller. I guess for $73, I shouldn't even think about using a used cam, even if it only ran for a short time.

  #24  
Old 09-29-2016, 06:51 PM
SMW SMW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 121
Default

I ran the Crower 60916 and Rhoades lifters and 8.8:1 compression and the car idled with 18 inches of vacuum. Idled very smoothly. The duration is 221/229 at 0.050. The Rhoades are said to reduce duration by 10 degrees at low speeds. That would put the duration at 211/219. The 2801 cam with regular lifters is 214/224 at 0.050. I had a Rhoades lifter go bad so I bought a new set and there are 5 bad lifters in this set. One did not have the oil hole drilled all the way through. I called Rhoades about the hole not being drilled and he sent me a replacement. I asked about why the lifters looked different that the 10 year old lifters I had and he told me he got a new supplier. When I got the engine running there were four more that were clacking really, really loud. I have not been able to get anybody from Rhoades on the phone so I am going to switch to the 2801 cam. Be careful about the new Rhoades lifters.

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0673.JPG
Views:	51
Size:	171.0 KB
ID:	437642

  #25  
Old 09-29-2016, 07:16 PM
ponyakr's Avatar
ponyakr ponyakr is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Louisiana
Posts: 7,621
Default

That's really bad news about the Rhoads lifters. They have been using the Hylift Johnson cores. Never had any problems with even one.

I suppose this may mean that they are now using Chinese made cores.

Anybody else had any problems with the new Rhoads ?

Just Googled it. This must be a new problem. Didn't see anything about any problems with Rhoads lifters. If they are indeed that bad, the news will be online very soon.


Last edited by ponyakr; 09-29-2016 at 07:21 PM.
  #26  
Old 09-29-2016, 07:44 PM
Ben M.'s Avatar
Ben M. Ben M. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,796
Default

I ran the 2801 in my iron headed 8.5:1 400 for years and while it was perfectly acceptable, it didn't exactly light the world on fire.

  #27  
Old 09-29-2016, 08:21 PM
goa484's Avatar
goa484 goa484 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Oxford, CT
Posts: 195
Default

I got a set of vmax rhodes lifters this march and have had zero issues over 1500 mi so far on them. They seemed pretty quality too out of the box.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017