FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"...I want peak power at maybe 3000-4000 rpm..."
A cam that small would probably have less than 210 dur @ .050. That makes the Summit 2800 your best choice. I've never seen a dyno test of a low comp 400, with this cam. But, I'll just guess that the torque would peak at somewhere between 2000 & 3000 rpm, and the horsepower would peak at 4000 rpm or just a hair less. It would have a dead smooth idle & plenty of vac. Would probably run completely out of steam at, or just below 5000 rpm. I wouldn't go any smaller than an 068 clone. But the Summit 2801 is cheaper, with more lift. So, since price is a concern, I'd say the 2801 is your best choice, for use with your Rhoads lifters & 1.6 rockers. Last edited by ponyakr; 09-29-2016 at 06:10 PM. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I sold that car to a friend who really just wanted the body. I may even be able to get that same cam from a few years ago. The guy ran the car with the 2801 for about 20 minutes before tearing into it. He ended up with a 464 stroker, aluminum heads, and stump puller. I guess for $73, I shouldn't even think about using a used cam, even if it only ran for a short time. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I ran the Crower 60916 and Rhoades lifters and 8.8:1 compression and the car idled with 18 inches of vacuum. Idled very smoothly. The duration is 221/229 at 0.050. The Rhoades are said to reduce duration by 10 degrees at low speeds. That would put the duration at 211/219. The 2801 cam with regular lifters is 214/224 at 0.050. I had a Rhoades lifter go bad so I bought a new set and there are 5 bad lifters in this set. One did not have the oil hole drilled all the way through. I called Rhoades about the hole not being drilled and he sent me a replacement. I asked about why the lifters looked different that the 10 year old lifters I had and he told me he got a new supplier. When I got the engine running there were four more that were clacking really, really loud. I have not been able to get anybody from Rhoades on the phone so I am going to switch to the 2801 cam. Be careful about the new Rhoades lifters.
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's really bad news about the Rhoads lifters. They have been using the Hylift Johnson cores. Never had any problems with even one.
I suppose this may mean that they are now using Chinese made cores. ![]() Anybody else had any problems with the new Rhoads ? ![]() Just Googled it. This must be a new problem. Didn't see anything about any problems with Rhoads lifters. If they are indeed that bad, the news will be online very soon. Last edited by ponyakr; 09-29-2016 at 07:21 PM. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I ran the 2801 in my iron headed 8.5:1 400 for years and while it was perfectly acceptable, it didn't exactly light the world on fire.
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I got a set of vmax rhodes lifters this march and have had zero issues over 1500 mi so far on them. They seemed pretty quality too out of the box.
|
Reply |
|
|