Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-22-2015, 11:52 AM
MescaBug's Avatar
MescaBug MescaBug is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,634
Default 1972 GTO built in Oct 71 - Windage tray or baffled pan?

Going thru a 72 engine. Should we install a windage tray or a baffled pan for an Oct 71 built car?

Thanks

  #2  
Old 07-22-2015, 12:44 PM
Lloyd-TX's Avatar
Lloyd-TX Lloyd-TX is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bellaire (HO-uston), Texas
Posts: 9,012
Default

Both!

__________________
Regards,
"455HO" Lloyd


2008 GMC Sierra Denali 2WD Crew, L92 6L80E, Silver w/ Ebony guts, 14.26 @ 98
  #3  
Old 07-22-2015, 03:53 PM
MescaBug's Avatar
MescaBug MescaBug is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,634
Default

Oh well, ok then

I thought cars got either one or the other, but not both.

Thanks

  #4  
Old 07-22-2015, 06:28 PM
Lloyd-TX's Avatar
Lloyd-TX Lloyd-TX is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bellaire (HO-uston), Texas
Posts: 9,012
Default

I was just being "cute", but using both is what I've always done.

The baffle helps keep oil from sloshing away from the oil pump pickup inlet during hard turns and panic stops, and the windage tray helps keep the crankshaft "windage" from frothing up the oil in the sump.

EDIT: BTW - factory install on the 1972 V8's was the windage tray only. The baffled pan showed up for the 1973 model year.

__________________
Regards,
"455HO" Lloyd


2008 GMC Sierra Denali 2WD Crew, L92 6L80E, Silver w/ Ebony guts, 14.26 @ 98
  #5  
Old 07-23-2015, 11:52 AM
MescaBug's Avatar
MescaBug MescaBug is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,634
Default

Thanks Lloyd.

I wasnt sure if its ok to run both.

  #6  
Old 07-23-2015, 12:38 PM
Lloyd-TX's Avatar
Lloyd-TX Lloyd-TX is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bellaire (HO-uston), Texas
Posts: 9,012
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by MescaBug View Post
Thanks Lloyd.

I wasnt sure if its ok to run both.
No problemo.

By the way, as I recall you may run only the "3/4 length" windage tray when using the baffled pan. I cannot recall what year model that Pontiac made the change-over to the 3/4 length tray, but I believe that it was prior to the 1972 model year.

HTH!.

__________________
Regards,
"455HO" Lloyd


2008 GMC Sierra Denali 2WD Crew, L92 6L80E, Silver w/ Ebony guts, 14.26 @ 98
  #7  
Old 07-23-2015, 03:18 PM
MescaBug's Avatar
MescaBug MescaBug is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,634
Default

3/4" is what I have.

Thanks again!

  #8  
Old 07-23-2015, 04:26 PM
Lloyd-TX's Avatar
Lloyd-TX Lloyd-TX is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bellaire (HO-uston), Texas
Posts: 9,012
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by MescaBug View Post
3/4" is what I have.

Thanks again!
Any time . . .

__________________
Regards,
"455HO" Lloyd


2008 GMC Sierra Denali 2WD Crew, L92 6L80E, Silver w/ Ebony guts, 14.26 @ 98
  #9  
Old 07-26-2015, 01:54 AM
Squidward's Avatar
Squidward Squidward is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 4,383
Default

Concerning the un-baffled pan... I was running one on my FB's previous engine. Despite being filled to spec, when I would brake hard at a stoplight or at the end of the quarter mile I'd see oil pressure drop to nothing. It made my choice of pan ('78) on the next build a very clear one, and haven't had that issue.

__________________
"...ridge reamer and ring compressor? Do they have tools like that?"
  #10  
Old 07-29-2015, 01:42 PM
north's Avatar
north north is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,411
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squidward View Post
Concerning the un-baffled pan... I was running one on my FB's previous engine. Despite being filled to spec, when I would brake hard at a stoplight or at the end of the quarter mile I'd see oil pressure drop to nothing. It made my choice of pan ('78) on the next build a very clear one, and haven't had that issue.
They were counting on the crappy handling and braking of GTO's to prevent oil starvation problems ;-)

__________________
My Break Away Squad
1969 Fbird (Base, 350 & Sprint Cvt’s - 400HO & TA Hardtops)
1969 LeMans (2dr & 4dr Hardtop and a Cvt)
1969 LeMans Safari 2 seat Wagon
1969 GTO (2 Cvt, 2 Hardtops & Judge Hardtop)
1969 Catalina (3 Cvt’s & a 2dr hardtop)
1969 Ventura 2 Seat Wagon
1969 Executive 4dr Sedan
1969 Bonnie Cvt
1969 Bonnie 3 Seat Wagon (2 of them)
1969 Bonnie Brougham (4dr Hardtop & Cvt)
1969 Grand Prix SJ (2 of them)
1969 2+2 2dr Hardtop (Canadian model)
  #11  
Old 07-30-2015, 07:25 AM
Squidward's Avatar
Squidward Squidward is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 4,383
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by north View Post
They were counting on the crappy handling and braking of GTO's to prevent oil starvation problems ;-)
1st gens aren't much better!

I've seen that there are baffles available that can be welded in.

__________________
"...ridge reamer and ring compressor? Do they have tools like that?"
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:24 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017