FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Nothing wrong with the 1.96 valve on a 350. Unless,you would spend a few more $ for a 2.08 valve while at the machine shop getting screw in studs and good springs.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Getting decent compression out of a 350 is gonna be more important than big valves. A 2.11 valve is not necessary even for a wild 350.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
So maybe just mill the heads?
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Mine would have at least screw in studs, new valves and springs. If you`re gonna spend money to mill, do em up decent.
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
"Getting decent compression out of a 350 is gonna be more important than big valves. A 2.11 valve is not necessary even for a wild 350."
+2 No want or need for big valves, or really any porting as any stock "D" port head is PLENTY for over 1hp/cid on a 350 build. I'd find the smallest chamber head that I could, and cut it down to 68cc or so, deck/square the block for zero, and put an 068 size cam in it. This will get the engine up near 10 to 1 compression for optimum power on pump fuel, allow for a larger cam with less negatives in idle quality and low speed power production with the small 350cid engine.....Cliff
__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran! https://cliffshighperformance.com/ 73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile), |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah, the 1.96 valve on a small cam 350 with 2.78 gears will be better than the 2.11 as the air velocity will be faster, for a better fill than the larger valve at lower rpm`s and lower lifts.
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
That would be nice, not shure yet. It's been a few years since I went.
__________________
63 Catalina coupe 467 cid budget drag car 11's 1/4 , 7.3 1/8th pump gas n/a 66 Star Chief Executive 57k mile 69 Le Mans 2 dr HT 350 85k mile 15 sec 1/4 69 Firebird 400 Burgandy/Black 70 Olds Rallye 350 F85 4 speed 3.91's 70 Olds Cutlass Cruiser Red Wagon 350 101k miles 15 sec 1/4 12 sec w 455 74 Cheyenne Super C10 LWB Gen 6 454 w ZZ502 cam 3.07gear 13.1 1/4, 8.3 1/8 2020 RAM 1500 SLT 4x4 5.7 A8 Hemi 2007 Hummer H3 3.7 liter turd 2019 Chevy Spark petrol car 38 mpg |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Thinking about it now, I can see where a set of the `70, 16 heads would work well on that motor. That should do the compression better than the 11`s without the milling.
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Also for the sake of having all its exhaust bolt holes tapped like the 68 #17's the 68 #15 off a 400 big car
__________________
63 Catalina coupe 467 cid budget drag car 11's 1/4 , 7.3 1/8th pump gas n/a 66 Star Chief Executive 57k mile 69 Le Mans 2 dr HT 350 85k mile 15 sec 1/4 69 Firebird 400 Burgandy/Black 70 Olds Rallye 350 F85 4 speed 3.91's 70 Olds Cutlass Cruiser Red Wagon 350 101k miles 15 sec 1/4 12 sec w 455 74 Cheyenne Super C10 LWB Gen 6 454 w ZZ502 cam 3.07gear 13.1 1/4, 8.3 1/8 2020 RAM 1500 SLT 4x4 5.7 A8 Hemi 2007 Hummer H3 3.7 liter turd 2019 Chevy Spark petrol car 38 mpg |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
If you mill the heads over .030, remember to have the intake surface milled also, some say half the head surface number, some say mill the same amount.
Zero decking the block will increase compression, and improve combustion, depending on your selection of parts...
__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A. I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977. Shut it off Shut it off Buddy, I just shut your Prius down... |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
Had a set of the '70 #16's on a 73 350. That set was 78 cc stock, I had them milled to 68 cc putting CR at 10:1 with flat tops in std bore. I was running 204/214 cam and I really liked that combo, but think that cam was a little on the small side. That combo would have liked something more like the 068 cam especially with my 4-speed and 3.36 gears.
|
Reply |
|
|