Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-29-2013, 04:58 PM
1stgenbird's Avatar
1stgenbird 1stgenbird is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Derry, NH
Posts: 711
Default Rear Drum to Disc Rear End Swap

I just picked up a posi disc rear from a late 70's TA to replace the drum non-posi rear currently in my '81 TA.

What parts do I need to do the swap correctly? I have been told the power brake booster is larger for the disc rears and the proportioning valve may need to be changed.

Any guidance would be appreciated.

  #2  
Old 10-29-2013, 06:33 PM
drtracer58 drtracer58 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Panama City,Fla
Posts: 238
Default

Yes the Proportioning Valve , Master Cylinder is also different , I think I have always seen the small diameter Booster on Rear Disc Cars, I know minw has the smaller Booster

The Following User Says Thank You to drtracer58 For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 10-29-2013, 08:30 PM
rexs73gto rexs73gto is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Niles MI.
Posts: 4,319
Default

The prop valve needs to be replaced , & it's usually cheaper & a better bet to replace it with an adjustable prop valve that way you can fine tune the front to rear bias. You don't need to replace the booster or master cylinder if you use the adjustable prop valve. The smaller booster is a duel diaphram booster & they use that for room so you don't need to replace that as it fits your car now. With the adjustable prop valve any amount of pressure gained or lost will be adjusted out with it.

The Following User Says Thank You to rexs73gto For This Useful Post:
  #4  
Old 10-29-2013, 09:50 PM
Grand73Am Grand73Am is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 2,945
Default

The factory setup does include the dual diaphragm booster. It has a smaller diameter, but it's longer, front to back, like fatter that way, so not really "smaller".
Prop valve is different too. And you'd need a master cylinder for rear discs.

This may be something else you'd have to do for the factory conversion. Supposedly the pushrod pin on the brake pedal is in a different location on a pedal for rear discs. Someone posted this pic a few years ago showing where to move the position of the pin to:


__________________
Steve F.
The Following User Says Thank You to Grand73Am For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 11-01-2013, 01:11 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,619
Default

Booster is different dual diaphragm 79-80 took a iron MC, 81 a larger register quick take up aluminum MC as the calipers are "low drag". It gives more assist -why you need a lower ratio pedal.

Pedal ratio is different but you can redrill a standard one like the picture. If you don't it will still stop good,but using your little toe for pressure!

Don't worry about a prop valve -T the fronts and add an adjustable in the rear line. That way you can fine tune for different spring rates, shock rates and tires comapred to the factory set one.

Be sure the rear calipers are actually ratcheting with the lever E brake. They often lock up and do not causing poor brake response(too much gap pads to rotor). If you need new ones think about some rebuilt "lifetime warranty" as somewhere they may freeze up. I personally think silicone fluid helps prevent that and I have it in both mine and have no poor pedal feel even on hard braking as some folks say silicone does.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #6  
Old 12-05-2013, 09:37 AM
pontiac1981's Avatar
pontiac1981 pontiac1981 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CLEVELAND OHIO
Posts: 212
Default

How does the smaller booster work out with rear drum brakes? I have an 81 and I swapped the large booster for the small one, I changed the master and I had to reroute the lines at the master as they were reverse from the original, I left the original prop valve figuring that would work ok. I haven't gotten to the brake pedal rod yet.

  #7  
Old 12-05-2013, 09:56 AM
Grand73Am Grand73Am is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 2,945
Default

You have rear drum brakes now? I think either booster works fine with rear drums.

But I think you must use a disc/drum prop valve, if you have rear drums. The valve for disc/drum is proportioned to prevent the rear drums from locking up before the fronts. So, if you use a disc/disc valve with rear drums, you might find the rear brakes will lock up before the fronts. You could try it as it is, but if the rears are locking up, you'll know what the problem is.

__________________
Steve F.
  #8  
Old 12-05-2013, 10:03 AM
pontiac1981's Avatar
pontiac1981 pontiac1981 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CLEVELAND OHIO
Posts: 212
Default

I replaced the prop valve with the same that was on the car, front disc rear drum.

  #9  
Old 12-05-2013, 07:28 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,619
Default

The smaller booster since it is dual diaphragm just gives more assist. So you might need to adjust pedal ratio.

I'd still ditch the stock prop valve and T the fronts and use an adjustable in the rear. Even my factory rear drum setup hard corners the rear would lock up as the suspension unloaded. That way different rear tires, shocks ar when you add the discs you can tune it to your car. Factory prop valve is set for stock springs,shocks tires and an average driver.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:33 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017