| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#41
10-11-2013, 07:37 AM
|
||||
|
||||
5-8 in oil? yep
10 in lash? possible MORE in dominator? YES! 20 I would say. very nice build...
__________________
EHTTFMF!  Being dead, it is not hard on you. You don't even know you're dead. It is hard on everyone else that is not dead. BEING STUPID WORKS THE SAME WAY! The rest of us suffer. |
|
#42
10-11-2013, 07:58 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
What's the specs of the valve springs?
|
|
#43
10-11-2013, 08:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Installed height 1.800 130#'s .600 max lift 318#'s coil bind 1.140 Great little spring! Brian
__________________
 Boobs & bacon 
|
|
#44
10-11-2013, 08:29 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I've got a Pro Systems 1200 cfm carb. I know, it's probably way too much, but it's worth a shot at the track. Thanks for the kind comments! Brian
__________________
Boobs & bacon
|
|
#45
10-11-2013, 11:01 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm not sure a Dominator would pick it up 20. My 500" motor picked up nothing with an 8896 over my 850.
He did a really nice job on parts selection. Good luck with it.
__________________
Skip Fix 1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever! 1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand 1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project 2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4 1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project 1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs |
|
#46
10-11-2013, 04:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
My 434 picked up .04 going to a 4500 from a 4150. (850 to 1050) Same intake. Slightly slower 60 foot. Made up on the big end.
__________________
fasteddy |
|
#47
10-11-2013, 04:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
NICE BUILD!
__________________
Sandoval Performance www.sandovalperformance.com Pontiac Crate Engines CNC Edelbrock heads Custom Ground Cams JOHNSON Limited Travel Hydraulic Roller Lifters |
|
#48
10-12-2013, 04:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
That's a crapload of lift for a flat tappet.. 1.65 ratio would put lobe at .372 + ?? |
|
#49
10-12-2013, 04:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
.615 lift is with 1.65 rockers.
Brian
__________________
Boobs & bacon
|
|
#50
10-13-2013, 06:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was asking because it has been a few years since I checked on Comps latest lobe catalog.
I had never seen .373 lobe lift solid flat with only 254 @ .050 duration. Well, here it is.. |
|
#51
10-13-2013, 06:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Todd Goodwin spec'd the cam. He told us we would be "tickled pink" with it. Brian
__________________
Boobs & bacon
|
|
#52
10-13-2013, 06:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Neat stuff! Did you guys have the cam nitrided? |
|
#53
10-13-2013, 07:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Brian
__________________
Boobs & bacon
|
|
#54
10-14-2013, 09:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm astounded you're getting those numbers with a flat tappet. I'm currently building an almost identical engine and I'd been spec'd a roller to get around that.
I haven't pulled the trigger on the cam yet and I'd sure would like to save that roller money for something else. The numbers you hit are the max I can run and stay in class anyway. Great job!
__________________
https://www.facebook.com/Outlaw-Vint...7899333725868/ |
|
#55
10-14-2013, 02:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If my comment was correct about this cam using the Comp GSI lobe. They are supposed to be the latest and greatest in solid flat. Many of us know how fancy and new does not always translate to better.. LOL If this cams exhaust side also has .615 lift with 1.65 rocker then it would use a different lobe, probably the "tight lash" series. Todd Goodwin and company are sharp for sure, they have a Spintron over there. |
|
#56
10-14-2013, 03:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Brian
__________________
Boobs & bacon
|
|
#57
10-14-2013, 03:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd like to see the numbers from 3500 and up, 4700 and up is fine for drag racing but I need 3500-7000
__________________
https://www.facebook.com/Outlaw-Vint...7899333725868/ |
|
#58
10-14-2013, 10:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Give me a day or two. Brian
__________________
Boobs & bacon
|
|
#59
10-15-2013, 10:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was looking over these numbers again, this combination made right around 2.0 HP per CFM. Considering an un-ported set of E-heads flow right around 275 CFM on my bench, I would say the tweaking I did on the heads were worth around 50 HP to 60 HP.
Does anyone have any data on a set of un-ported set of E-heads on a 434? I would think the engine would have made right around 550 HP in the stock E-head form. Calvin Hill Hill Performance 708-250-7420 |
|
#60
10-15-2013, 10:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Life is hard, it's even harder if your stupid- John Wayne |
| Reply |
|
|
The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.
Linear Mode
