| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#21
08-17-2013, 02:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Well, a Cam of lesser Duration(Overlap) than my signature may suit the 3.08:1 gears better. Butt Hay remember the MPG will benefit from a....bigger cam in effect of exhaust gas Reversion taking the space of fuel-air inhale. So the smaller cam (likely) has less MPG. What; did I just say that?
BUT, for the cam I'm showing; either the rear or Converter has to give. I have a bit of both, whereas a 2200 stall & 3.08:1 has neither. So, Is there a Suitable "strong-pull-away, strong-running" cam having great MPG? not likely since the low-end pull-away & Exhaust reversion are at odds. Wonder how the 2802 or Voodoo cam will do on MPG with the 9:1?
__________________
12.24/111.6MPH/1.76 60'/28"/3.54:1/SP-TH400/469 R96A/236-244-112LC/1050&TorkerI//3850Lbs//15MPG/89oct Sold 2003: 12.00/112MPH/1.61 60'/26"x3.31:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Q-Jet-Torker/3650Lbs//18MPG 94oct Sold 1994: 11.00/123MPH/1.50 60'/29.5"x4.10:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Dual600s-Wenzler/3250Lbs//94oct Last edited by Half-Inch Stud; 08-17-2013 at 02:21 PM. |
|
#22
08-17-2013, 02:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Continental 10" converter
__________________
color me gone |
|
#23
08-17-2013, 04:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes I meant the 10510701
__________________
Tim Corcoran |
| Reply |
|
|
The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.
Linear Mode
