FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for the thread link!
__________________
Brent '72 GP '88 GTA '01 T/A http://www.WideTrackDrive.com Others have caught on. But they haven't caught up. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Don't forget the advantages of the lighter aluminum heads too. The lower weight on the front end will help make your performance snappier.
__________________
Steve F. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
I'll also be going from the stock intake to the Torker II. More savings!
__________________
Brent '72 GP '88 GTA '01 T/A http://www.WideTrackDrive.com Others have caught on. But they haven't caught up. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Torker II....good choice. Naysayers pipe up that you'll lose some low-end torque. But guess what...you've got a ton of it anyway.
Changed from E-brock RPM to T2 and picked up .14 at the track. Jim
__________________
65 Catalina sedan. Allen Thomas Performance 495. KRE Heads at 310cfm ported by SD Performance, ProSystems Dominator carb on ported Victor intake, P-Dude custom grind hydraulic roller, MSD ignition, 3.50 Moser/Ford rear. F-Glass front bumper by son Rob, rear by the old man and joint effort for trunk lid. 3950# w/driver. Best of 9.5761/139 on 175 shot, 6.01 /114 in 1/8. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Nice data point!
__________________
Brent '72 GP '88 GTA '01 T/A http://www.WideTrackDrive.com Others have caught on. But they haven't caught up. |
Reply |
|
|