FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
oil
Do a google search for Brad penn oils...plenty of zinc...quality oil
__________________
1978 TA ram air V heads waiting to be run 2000 MT-500 Harley Davidson military motorcycle 1 of apx 169 1991 USMC KLR-250 "devil dogs" X's 2 1979 M-151 US Army Hooah! 1975 A-350 Condor Swiss army motorcycle 1 of 3000 made 1974 A-350 Condor Swiss army " " " 1966 M-274 A2 mule USMC 1966 M-274 A2 mule USMC ------------------------------------- "Gort, Klatu barada nickto" |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Bottom line is you get what you pay for..
__________________
1973 T/A Buccaneer Red L-75 A3,83k mi. #'s match 1979 T/A Atlantis Blue W-72 WS6 23k mi.survivor#'s match 1999 T/A Navy Blue 60k mi....babied 1968 442-gone but not forgotten "Oh,you can think about it,.....but don't do it!" Sheriff Bufford T.Justice |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I can settle this for everyone right here and now. Everyone check out this website:
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com If you do a search through their UOA's (Used Oil Analysis) and VOA's (Virgin Oil Analysis) you will find that the following oil consistently test LOW for Zinc and Phosphorus additives. Mobil 1 Valvoline VR1 Royal Purple In fact the only oil that consistently seems to always test high is Shell Rotella. Take this for instance: Valvoline advertises that their oil contains 1200ppm of Zinc and Phosphorus, however when their oil is tested it always contains 800 something PPM. Supposedly a good oil should have somewhere between 1100 and 1300 PPM... Shell Rotella seems to always maintain this PPM rating when their oil is tested. The others do not. I am sold on Shell Rotella. If for nothing else, than the simple fact that Valvoline is lying to its customers. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
http://www.shell.com/home/Framework?...n/welcome.html
Shell Rotella even offers their own oil analysis service to help you more accurately gauge your engines performance and wear. Shell Rotella website even has a very good Q/A section where they answer all these questions about Synthetic Vs natural oils. I think Shell Rotella Synthetic will be my choice of oil from now on. And its available at 95% of truck stops nation wide! |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
FWIW, I rebuilt my '71 455HO two and a half years ago. First time the bottom end has been apart. I rebuilt it because the rear main seal was leaking so bad I could not drive it anywhere without a drip pan. When I pulled it apart the bearings, crank and cylinder walls looked good enough that I should have just popped in the new rear seal and buttoned her up. I have run either SAE 30 or diesel spec 15w-40 for as long as I can remember, probably back to the late 80s, and I believe I ran 10w-40 prior to that (per Owner's manual).
After the rebuild I broke it in with conventional 15w-40 and a can of EOS (you could still get it 2 years ago). After the first oil change, again with diesel spec 15w-40 I noticed some rocker arm chirping. I immediately changed to Mobil 1 15w-50 and a small bottle of GM cam break-in lube, as the Mobil 1 might be a tad low in zinc and phosphorous. I have run Mobil 1 ever since. It is quiet and oil consumption has been minimal, but I have not pulled apart other than to retorque the head bolts. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
I use Brad Penn Racing 10W-30.
Be careful with the Rotella. It used to have 1200ppm zinc but was reformulated a few years ago and I believe the zinc was lowered. The oil tests Mirk are referencing may be based on the old formula. There are several threads on PY here discussing this.
__________________
1968 Firebird 400HO convertible 1971 Trans Am 4-speed, white/blue |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Brad-Penn 10W-30 in my '72 455HO engine.
Various grades of Brad-Penn in ALL my engines. I like non-synthetic #40 in my really antique vehicles, and in my blown-alky hemi.
__________________
Anybody else on this planet campaign a M/T hemi Pontiac for eleven seasons? ... or has built a record breaking DOHC hemi four cylinder Pontiac? ... or has driven a couple laps of Nuerburgring with Tri-Power Pontiac power?(back in 1967) |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
John J. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The big three lobbied the motor oil companies to remove the higher levels of ZDDP because it was ruining their catalytic convertors before 100k miles,and they were liable to replace them,they decided it was the ZDDP levels doing this. No one made this public becasue it was like a screw the flat tappet guys there isn't many left anyways The lower levels were sufficient in roller cam engines made after 1986 from what I understand. If RP is lying about levels lower than 1100-1300 ppm ZDDP than claimed in the email I posted,I can guarantee they're gonna hear about it,not just from me,many flat tappet owners have been using them because of their claim. Amsoil is another that puts right in their as in HPP sufficient ZDDP amounts for flat tappets,may switch to them.
__________________
1973 T/A Buccaneer Red L-75 A3,83k mi. #'s match 1979 T/A Atlantis Blue W-72 WS6 23k mi.survivor#'s match 1999 T/A Navy Blue 60k mi....babied 1968 442-gone but not forgotten "Oh,you can think about it,.....but don't do it!" Sheriff Bufford T.Justice |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
What do you guys think of the new oil that recently came out called
Musclecar Oil by Z-alt? It's supposedly for pre-1975 and addresses all the needs of older cars. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Bobistheoilguy.com did not seem to have an oil test posted for it yet. Looks promising.
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That's a good website! It's been a few years since I was there so I poked around a bit for my favorite oil, Redline. Here's what I found for their 10w40 virgin oil analysis. I personally use the 5w40. Zinc levels still look good, I just wish it were cheaper. http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums...1539713&page=1 Iron: 2 Tin: 3 Lead: 1 Chrom: 1 Alum: 2 Calcium: 2228 Mag: 56 Zinc: 1446 Phos: 1337 Moly: 677 Barium: 5 Sil: 19 Boron: 17 83.9 14.2 tbn: 8.6 Tan 2.51 And this link is for their analysis of Redline's 5w40. They really praise the ZDDP levels here. http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums...1465711&page=1 |
Reply |
|
|