| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
08-07-2007, 11:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
fastest with 60916 or 60919
What's the fastest you've been with either cam?
|
|
#2
08-08-2007, 12:40 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
What size engine? What weight car?
In my Ventura with a low compression 8.9-1 400, unported heads, Torker I, RA IV cam, 3000 stall, and 3.70 gear... 13.60 @102.54 Same engine/car but with ported heads, milled to raise compression to 9.44-1, "Performer" intake, #60916 cam w/1.65 rockers, 2000 stall,and 3.70 gear went 12.991 @ 106.54 To be fair, the first engine was running Crane #99840 single valvesprings and the current setup has Crower #608404 dual springs. Which may have also been responsible for performance changes. If you have a bigger engine then it's a totally different story. In a 455 the #60916 will be a torque monster. With the #60919 w/1.65's you would have a more performance oriented build. Not radical but strong. JD
__________________
Good luck to the new owner of the Ventura II! Sold the car after 13+ years. Look for it on the Hot Rod Power Tour in the future as it's currently being re-configured as a Pro-Touring ride! 
|
| Reply |
|
|
The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.
Linear Mode
