Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 02-04-2007, 09:05 PM
Goatman Goatman is offline
On Vacation
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Dighton, MA
Posts: 3,665
Default

Same rules should apply. Putting it to the floor without the support of the frame is stupid.

  #82  
Old 02-04-2007, 09:16 PM
David Holmberg's Avatar
David Holmberg David Holmberg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Port Charlotte, Florida
Posts: 8,688
Send a message via AIM to David Holmberg
Default

Bruce have you ever seen a rear frame on a Firebird? There is no frame just some sheet metal welded to the floor pan, nothing that even resembles a frame. Now the front has a real looking frame, but not the rear.

There is a reason that the NHRA and the IHRA write the rules the way they do, and it's not to make it easier or cheaper on the racer...

  #83  
Old 02-04-2007, 09:56 PM
Goatman Goatman is offline
On Vacation
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Dighton, MA
Posts: 3,665
Default

Dave, the fact is there are two rear frame rails and given the fact that subframe cars are already significantly weaker than the full frame cars, every effort should be made to get them as solid as posible.


Easier is the word for sure. And its a cop-out.

  #84  
Old 02-05-2007, 12:35 AM
Brian Baker's Avatar
Brian Baker Brian Baker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Posts: 17,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PONTIAC DUDE
You will need to move your rear bars you have mounted to the tunnel. They won't pass NHRA tech.

They have to be mounted to plates welded to the rear subframe.

Page #222 footnote D.

Those bars might not be required for a roll bar (call NHRA) but definate for a cage, so if ya upgrade later, better to moven em now.
They might, they might not. Had no problem with mine getting certified to 7.50 (before they change the rules, it would only go to 8.50 now) with them welded to the driveshaft hump in that fashion. I never understood that "subframe" aspect of it anyhow...if it's a unibody car, a plate anywhere back there on the floor should suffice.

__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut.
  #85  
Old 02-05-2007, 12:52 AM
Brian Baker's Avatar
Brian Baker Brian Baker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Posts: 17,184
Default

Egad, Probird! Get that welder out and finish welding those plates to the floor around all sides. Did an inspector actually put a sticker on that?

And, Bruce. On uni-body cars...the floor is the frame, more or less. The rear subframe on them is nothing more than C-channel stock welded to the bottom of the floor pans. Using your train of thought, if someone were to weld a 6x6 plate to the floorpan directly above the C-channel rear subframe, it would accomplish the same thing as what you're talking about.

__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut.
  #86  
Old 02-05-2007, 12:59 AM
455Dave's Avatar
455Dave 455Dave is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammen8
What we did with my unibody car where the windsheild bars come down is, built a outrigger off of the front subframe and welded that to the floor and suframe then put a 6X6 plate over the top with that plate welded to the rocker panel, floor and outrigger, then welded the bar to it... Should be plenty strong

Chad
That sounds like they way my 8 point is installed. Outriggers welded to the subframe tied into the side bars. The hoop is attached with plates in the rocker sill area and the inner bars off the hoop are welded to tubular subframe connectors. The rear bars are bent to follow the contour of the roof and are welded to the frame rails in the trunk. It's a full interior car so I didn't want to hack it up a lot.

  #87  
Old 02-05-2007, 10:30 AM
PONTIAC DUDE's Avatar
PONTIAC DUDE PONTIAC DUDE is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 14,756
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Baker
They might, they might not. Had no problem with mine getting certified to 7.50 (before they change the rules, it would only go to 8.50 now) with them welded to the driveshaft hump in that fashion. I never understood that "subframe" aspect of it anyhow...if it's a unibody car, a plate anywhere back there on the floor should suffice.

Full cage, they have to go to the rear subframe or they won't pass tech. That's what the Division 2 NHRA tech guy (Mike Wells) showed and told me 2 weeks ago when they failed my chassis after passing for 10 years wthout them.
Arguing won't change the rule.

  #88  
Old 02-05-2007, 10:38 AM
Brian Baker's Avatar
Brian Baker Brian Baker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Posts: 17,184
Default

Who's arguing? I'm just sharing what my experience was with our Division 1 tech.

If you want to get down to the nitty gritty, he isn't required to have those subframe "gusset" bars on a 10.00 and slower roll bar. Not needed until you go to a cage.

__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut.
  #89  
Old 02-05-2007, 11:19 AM
Matador-IV's Avatar
Matador-IV Matador-IV is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Woodward Ave.
Posts: 333
Default

Sorry to be so critical....but I've never seen so many poorly engineered roll bars in one post before.

Most will do little to 'curb' chassis flex or provide a reasonable amount of safety for the driver at track speed.

  #90  
Old 02-05-2007, 12:20 PM
PONTIAC DUDE's Avatar
PONTIAC DUDE PONTIAC DUDE is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 14,756
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Baker
Who's arguing? I'm just sharing what my experience was with our Division 1 tech.

If you want to get down to the nitty gritty, he isn't required to have those subframe "gusset" bars on a 10.00 and slower roll bar. Not needed until you go to a cage.

Brian, for the reading challenged. LOL.
I stated FULL CAGE in my above post and if you check my other posts I stated that if he EVER UPGRADED, that it would be a good idead to move the bars he has to the tunnle to the RIGHT Place.
I agree matador IV.

FWIW:
My car has full cage with front side to side crossbar and a true X brace to the rear. No straight rearward bars. Built in 1982. You can put my car up up 4 jackstands and pull any one stand out and the car will balance without any sag. You can see in any of my wheels up pics that both sides are level in the air. Also All the unibody and front subframe seams are fully welded. Makes a difference.

  #91  
Old 02-08-2007, 02:33 PM
pont406's Avatar
pont406 pont406 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: indiana usa
Posts: 1,669
Smile

the last issue of Hot Rod Magazine (March 07, same one with the Blown nitro pontiac motor) has several pics/tips of a roll cage installaion in a 2nd gen F body (F Bomb project) it shows how they tied the cage to the frame/ floorpan of the car, i think this is what P Dude and others were pointing out?

  #92  
Old 02-08-2007, 04:09 PM
Jack Ferris's Avatar
Jack Ferris Jack Ferris is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: West Jordan UT
Posts: 2,862
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matador-IV
Sorry to be so critical....but I've never seen so many poorly engineered roll bars in one post before.

Most will do little to 'curb' chassis flex or provide a reasonable amount of safety for the driver at track speed.
Why don't you post some pics of your work. Since Im sure its far superior to all the others out there. Maybe I could incorporate your expertise into the poorly engineered cages I do for others.

__________________
Jack Ferris
RestoRacing LLC
www.restoracing.com
Sandy, UT
---------------------------------------------------
  #93  
Old 02-08-2007, 04:55 PM
fasteddy's Avatar
fasteddy fasteddy is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Longmont, Co 80501
Posts: 2,635
Default

Well now. If it isn't young Jack FeRRis. Jack, I used 2 inch electrical conduit in my ride-certified to 15.0 and slower. JB weld is just fine to attach to the subframe plates and 4 self taping sheet metal screws for that added strength. Tonight I am going to add the duct tape per your suggestion-gotta keep that PS wheel on the ground ya know. With my set-up, NA to boot, 3.50 60s are possible on stock suspension and wide oval tires.

__________________
fasteddy
  #94  
Old 02-08-2007, 08:26 PM
Jack Ferris's Avatar
Jack Ferris Jack Ferris is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: West Jordan UT
Posts: 2,862
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fasteddy
Well now. If it isn't young Jack FeRRis. Jack, I used 2 inch electrical conduit in my ride-certified to 15.0 and slower. JB weld is just fine to attach to the subframe plates and 4 self taping sheet metal screws for that added strength. Tonight I am going to add the duct tape per your suggestion-gotta keep that PS wheel on the ground ya know. With my set-up, NA to boot, 3.50 60s are possible on stock suspension and wide oval tires.
Oh man I cant stop laughing.....With all the information you have I can tell you have read my book "How to construct a race car out of leftover job site materials". I disagree with your use of JB weld however. I just run the tubing through the floor and then mushroom the end so it wont come out. Woops there I go again giving away my secrets. My next inovation is going to be a swing out main hoop for rear seat access. I hope nobody beats me to it.

__________________
Jack Ferris
RestoRacing LLC
www.restoracing.com
Sandy, UT
---------------------------------------------------
  #95  
Old 02-08-2007, 09:21 PM
BVR421's Avatar
BVR421 BVR421 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Rusty Iron Ranch
Posts: 6,218
Default

WOW! what a great resourse this post is. Imagine, so many chassis design experts in one place.

__________________


My Daddy bought me a car but all I got was this old Pontiac.
  #96  
Old 02-08-2007, 10:09 PM
Brian Baker's Avatar
Brian Baker Brian Baker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Posts: 17,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BVR421
WOW! what a great resourse this post is. Imagine, so many chassis design experts in one place.
You're welcome.

__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut.
  #97  
Old 02-09-2007, 09:21 AM
ho428's Avatar
ho428 ho428 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fasteddy
Well now. If it isn't young Jack FeRRis. Jack, I used 2 inch electrical conduit in my ride-certified to 15.0 and slower. JB weld is just fine to attach to the subframe plates and 4 self taping sheet metal screws for that added strength. Tonight I am going to add the duct tape per your suggestion-gotta keep that PS wheel on the ground ya know. With my set-up, NA to boot, 3.50 60s are possible on stock suspension and wide oval tires.
Think I might have used EMT to save weight over conduit.

Reminds me, anyone see the Trucks TV show awhile back where they bought a Bronco to redo. The Roll bar was PVC pipe wrapped in black foam. Guess you'd call the county sewer inspector for Tech on that one.

  #98  
Old 02-09-2007, 10:14 AM
tempest455's Avatar
tempest455 tempest455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Hendersonville, TN
Posts: 2,145
Talking

"Back in the day", Arnie Beswick used to fab his roll bars out of exhaust tubing!

__________________
Tempest455
  #99  
Old 02-09-2007, 10:40 AM
Jack Ferris's Avatar
Jack Ferris Jack Ferris is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: West Jordan UT
Posts: 2,862
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ho428
Think I might have used EMT to save weight over conduit.

Reminds me, anyone see the Trucks TV show awhile back where they bought a Bronco to redo. The Roll bar was PVC pipe wrapped in black foam. Guess you'd call the county sewer inspector for Tech on that one.

Soon we will have to pull a permit to construct our cars.

__________________
Jack Ferris
RestoRacing LLC
www.restoracing.com
Sandy, UT
---------------------------------------------------
  #100  
Old 02-09-2007, 10:49 AM
ho428's Avatar
ho428 ho428 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Ferris
Soon we will have to pull a permit to construct our cars.
That would not surprise me.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017