Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-25-2012, 01:25 PM
65nss4spdGTO's Avatar
65nss4spdGTO 65nss4spdGTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,337
Default "Happy Holbrook" Dyno and Track Comparisons

I put together information from posts here on PY and actual info I’ve received from the participants. Attached is a break down of engine size, car weight and dyno info. All comparisons used the same formula, the data is correct for comparison purposes only, I don’t have the actual track temps and DA, but that’s the great thing about Norwalk, it becomes the true equalizer.

I also posted data from the 2011 heads up race including Marcella’s small engine and Rick Johnson’s info as I know Ricks car and dyno info. I also know the dyno information used by Rick has been backed up at the track by no less than 4 or 5 other cars.

I projected the weight by 6.75lbs, if any of this information is incorrect, please provide it and I will update the data.

* I also projected out Marcella’s 2012 engine taking consideration for his transmission issues, based on his 1/8 information and projected his ¼ MPH to match Kinsler’s.

Based on this info, I would say Holbrooks dyno was about 40 to 50 HP high when Marcella’s small engine and Mike Leech’s engine were tested. Marcella would need to run 156 MPH @ Norwalk in the same conditions to back up the dyno results from his 2012 engine showing 960 HP on the track.

Calvin Hill
Hill Performance
708-250-7420
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Heads_up_dyno.jpg
Views:	215
Size:	30.7 KB
ID:	304021  

  #2  
Old 11-25-2012, 01:33 PM
cgeise's Avatar
cgeise cgeise is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ellensburg,WA
Posts: 2,940
Default

Are you taking into the calculation the loss of " power" from the auto trans and a loose convertor ???

  #3  
Old 11-25-2012, 01:36 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,304
Default

Calvin, how can you compare Dyno Numbers on Holbrook's cell when you have no Dyno Temperature, Barometer, or Humidity (Wet/Dry Bulb) information in your analysis? Your data means nothing.

Tom Vaught

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #4  
Old 11-25-2012, 01:42 PM
65nss4spdGTO's Avatar
65nss4spdGTO 65nss4spdGTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,337
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cgeise View Post
Are you taking into the calculation the loss of " power" from the auto trans and a loose convertor ???
No, I'm using the actual track data (MPH). If you look at Kinsler's data, he has a very efficient HP to Ci and is running an automatic. I will say it now, Jeff's dyno numbers were conservative (1025 HP to 1050 HP), he also made a change with his convertor and that picked him up.

As you know being around NHRA class racing, the Stock and Super Stock cars can really cheat the ruler with the right convertor.

Calvin Hill
Hill Performance
708-250-7420

  #5  
Old 11-25-2012, 01:50 PM
65nss4spdGTO's Avatar
65nss4spdGTO 65nss4spdGTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,337
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
Calvin, how can you compare Dyno Numbers on Holbrook's cell when you have no Dyno Temperature, Barometer, or Humidity (Wet/Dry Bulb) information in your analysis? Your data means nothing.

Tom Vaught
Tom,

The dyno numbers were corrected at the time of the dyno. If you look at Leech's numbers and Marcella's small motor numbers, only 3 HP variation between the two test from the test to the track. Lets not argue about 20 or 30 HP, but Marcella's big motor isn't even in the same time zone when comparing dyno numbers to actual track data even with me projecting his 1/4 MPH off his 1/8 MPH.

btw, my data has the same cars running on the same track with the same ci to weight, don't tell me the data means nothing.

Calvin Hill
Hill Performance
708-250-7420

  #6  
Old 11-25-2012, 01:51 PM
Ken Criss Ken Criss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 192
Default

Picketts wagon has a 430 c.i. engine
Picketts coupe has a 445 c.i. alum.engine
Ken

  #7  
Old 11-25-2012, 01:53 PM
T Syron's Avatar
T Syron T Syron is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Plainfield, IL.
Posts: 1,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Criss View Post
Picketts wagon has a 430 c.i. engine
Picketts coupe has a 445 c.i. alum.engine
Ken
Ken,
Are they both running Liberty transmissions?

Thanks,
Tom Syron

  #8  
Old 11-25-2012, 02:06 PM
David Holmberg's Avatar
David Holmberg David Holmberg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Port Charlotte, Florida
Posts: 8,688
Send a message via AIM to David Holmberg
Default

John's car was a rush job to make Norwalk, to compare it to proven sorted out cars isn't really fair. Now if by mid summer John's car isn't running the expected numbers you can poke fun at his performance.

  #9  
Old 11-25-2012, 02:09 PM
65nss4spdGTO's Avatar
65nss4spdGTO 65nss4spdGTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,337
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Criss View Post
Picketts wagon has a 430 c.i. engine
Picketts coupe has a 445 c.i. alum.engine
Ken
Ken,

Thanks for updating me, I'll make the corrections,.

Would you be willing to share the dyno info?

Calvin Hill
Hill Performance
708-250-7420

  #10  
Old 11-25-2012, 02:10 PM
65nss4spdGTO's Avatar
65nss4spdGTO 65nss4spdGTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,337
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Holmberg View Post
John's car was a rush job to make Norwalk, to compare it to proven sorted out cars isn't really fair. Now if by mid summer John's car isn't running the expected numbers you can poke fun at his performance.
I agree, but I do believe he has had the car out since Norwalk, I could be wrong.

Calvin Hill
Hill Performance
708-250-7420

  #11  
Old 11-25-2012, 02:17 PM
slowbird's Avatar
slowbird slowbird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Montgomery, IL
Posts: 10,659
Default

Calvin can you post the formula that you are using?

  #12  
Old 11-25-2012, 02:21 PM
David Holmberg's Avatar
David Holmberg David Holmberg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Port Charlotte, Florida
Posts: 8,688
Send a message via AIM to David Holmberg
Default

NORWALK 2013, Go Big or Go Home.

  #13  
Old 11-25-2012, 03:22 PM
LiL Jack's Avatar
LiL Jack LiL Jack is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Millersville,MD. USA
Posts: 8,522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Holmberg View Post
NORWALK 2013, Go Big or Go Home.
7'S or bust!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

__________________
First Pontiac powered street car in the 7's

7.940@170.84. 3460#s
  #14  
Old 11-25-2012, 03:33 PM
Ron H's Avatar
Ron H Ron H is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Great White North
Posts: 5,807
Default

Don't jinx yourself Jack. I mean the bust part!

__________________
68 Firebird
Are you running with the wind or breaking it?
  #15  
Old 11-25-2012, 04:01 PM
john marcella john marcella is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 65nss4spdGTO View Post
I put together information from posts here on PY and actual info I’ve received from the participants. Attached is a break down of engine size, car weight and dyno info. All comparisons used the same formula, the data is correct for comparison purposes only, I don’t have the actual track temps and DA, but that’s the great thing about Norwalk, it becomes the true equalizer.

I also posted data from the 2011 heads up race including Marcella’s small engine and Rick Johnson’s info as I know Ricks car and dyno info. I also know the dyno information used by Rick has been backed up at the track by no less than 4 or 5 other cars.

I projected the weight by 6.75lbs, if any of this information is incorrect, please provide it and I will update the data.

* I also projected out Marcella’s 2012 engine taking consideration for his transmission issues, based on his 1/8 information and projected his ¼ MPH to match Kinsler’s.

Based on this info, I would say Holbrooks dyno was about 40 to 50 HP high when Marcella’s small engine and Mike Leech’s engine were tested. Marcella would need to run 156 MPH @ Norwalk in the same conditions to back up the dyno results from his 2012 engine showing 960 HP on the track.

Calvin Hill
Hill Performance
708-250-7420


LOL, put your calculator down. You dont have any real info on my car anyway.

I have had the car out 1 time sense Norwalk. Only 1 pass to the stripe, in and out of it 4 times and lean as hell ( 14.0 on the o2) 9.30 @ 157.4 LOL , Not a good pass.LOL
I could not leave the line with the radials, or get enough fuel in the motor, (new carb).

I dont know what you are trying to do but i can assure you you dont even have half the information to do it accurately At least with my car. Because i dont.

And 2011 i was 160? over weight, and had the same phucked up trans in it.

__________________
John Marcella
Marcella Manifolds Inc.
john@marcellamanifolds.net
ph. 248-259-6696
  #16  
Old 11-25-2012, 04:15 PM
john marcella john marcella is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 65nss4spdGTO View Post
Tom,

The dyno numbers were corrected at the time of the dyno. If you look at Leech's numbers and Marcella's small motor numbers, only 3 HP variation between the two test from the test to the track. Lets not argue about 20 or 30 HP, but Marcella's big motor isn't even in the same time zone when comparing dyno numbers to actual track data even with me projecting his 1/4 MPH off his 1/8 MPH.

btw, my data has the same cars running on the same track with the same ci to weight, don't tell me the data means nothing.

Calvin Hill
Hill Performance
708-250-7420

Leech did not run in 2011, so comparing his 2012 to my 2011 is crazy

Plus my times in 2011 in the 1/8 dont jive with the 1/4. Trans?????

My junk is so spun out that the best glimpse that i have for track performance is 1/8 mile MPH compared to Jeffs car on the same day. I had 1+ mph on him to the 1/8 at norwalk when we look at best to best. Pretty dam sad, at this point i have crap for usable info, so how can you have usable info?


Oh-your data means nothing

__________________
John Marcella
Marcella Manifolds Inc.
john@marcellamanifolds.net
ph. 248-259-6696
  #17  
Old 11-25-2012, 04:30 PM
Ken Criss Ken Criss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 65nss4spdGTO View Post
Ken,

Thanks for updating me, I'll make the corrections,.

Would you be willing to share the dyno info?

Calvin Hill
Hill Performance
708-250-7420
Calvin I could but I'm not. Our dyno dont compute with Holbrooks so I'm not getting into a dyno numbers game.but will tell you ours is much lower.

  #18  
Old 11-25-2012, 04:32 PM
65nss4spdGTO's Avatar
65nss4spdGTO 65nss4spdGTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,337
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by john marcella View Post
Leech did not run in 2011, so comparing his 2012 to my 2011 is crazy

Plus my times in 2011 in the 1/8 dont jive with the 1/4. Trans?????

My junk is so spun out that the best glimpse that i have for track performance is 1/8 mile MPH compared to Jeffs car on the same day. I had 1+ mph on him to the 1/8 at norwalk when we look at best to best. Pretty dam sad, at this point i have crap for usable info, so how can you have usable info?


Oh-your data means nothing
John,

The data I provided is the data I have. Do I need to go back to 2011 and pull the MPH and weight on all of the cars? Kinslers 2011 MPH was posted as was Rick Johnson's.

I spoke with Chris Holbrook last year about dynoing a few more engines, I really don't care as much about the actual number as much as if it is repeatable. I'm not knocking your car or your work, but where is the HP? Even at 157 MPH in the cool fall air has t shown the power.

So how far off is that dyno or is it spot on? Are your numbers and track times consistent with the engines you have dynoed? Is that dyno repeatable? Seems to be conflicting reports from you and Tom V.

Calvin Hill
Hill Performance
708-250-7420

  #19  
Old 11-25-2012, 04:37 PM
65nss4spdGTO's Avatar
65nss4spdGTO 65nss4spdGTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,337
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Criss View Post
Calvin I could but I'm not. Our dyno dont compute with Holbrooks so I'm not getting into a dyno numbers game.but will tell you ours is much lower.
Ken,

I understand. Must be those Liberty transmissions making all the extra power! Hats off to you guys with the Picketts program.

Calvin Hill
Hill Performance
708-250-7420

  #20  
Old 11-25-2012, 04:46 PM
john marcella john marcella is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 65nss4spdGTO View Post
John,

The data I provided is the data I have. Do I need to go back to 2011 and pull the MPH and weight on all of the cars? Kinslers 2011 MPH was posted as was Rick Johnson's.

I spoke with Chris Holbrook last year about dynoing a few more engines, I really don't care as much about the actual number as much as if it is repeatable. I'm not knocking your car or your work, but where is the HP? Even at 157 MPH in the cool fall air has t shown the power.

So how far off is that dyno or is it spot on? Are your numbers and track times consistent with the engines you have dynoed? Is that dyno repeatable? Seems to be conflicting reports from you and Tom V.

Calvin Hill
Hill Performance
708-250-7420
I know 157mph doesn't show it. 14.0 on the o2 and pedaling it 150ft out. 9.30 1.75 60 ft on that pass.
Me and my car are that far off. At this point i can even look at the dyno #s. I have not even made 1 pass at full throttle all the way down the track
Give me a chance to get it sorted.


2011 my car weighed 3085. can you run that across you calc i would like to know?

__________________
John Marcella
Marcella Manifolds Inc.
john@marcellamanifolds.net
ph. 248-259-6696
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017